Author :
Abstract
Keywords
Abstract
The aim of this research is to reveal the views of science teachers about the use of artificial intelligence in education. Phenomenology pattern, which is one of the qualitative research patterns, was used in the research. Within the scope of the research, focus group interviews were conducted with 30 science teachers in 15 different public middle schools in Diyarbakır city center. Before the focus group interviews were conducted, a pilot focus group interview was conducted with 6 different science teachers. Based on the themes obtained as a result of this pilot interview, a semi-structured interview form was prepared by the researchers. In the focus group interviews, the questions in this interview form were asked to the teachers. As a result of the research, it was revealed that the opinions of teachers about the use of artificial intelligence in education were gathered under five titles (themes). These themes are; "effect on students", "effect on teachers", "effect on education-teaching process", "concern" and "suggestion". For each of the themes of "effect on students", "effect on teachers" and "effect on education-teaching process", two categories named positive effect and negative effect were determined. While two categories, professional concern and ethical concern, were identified in relation to the theme of concern, two categories were determined in relation to the theme of suggestion, namely systemic suggestions and application suggestions.
Keywords
- Arslan, K. (2017). Artificial intelligence in education and its applications, Western Anatolian Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(1), 71-88.
- Baz, F. C. (2016). Designing a web-based adaptive online learning environment in accordance with the blended teaching model and its effect on student success, Ph.D. Thesis, Mustafa Kemal University, Institute of Science and Technology, Hatay.
- Baz, F.C., & Tetik, E. (2015). The use of blended teaching model with adaptive online learning environment and student expectations, International Journal of Scientific and Technological Research, 1(4), 22-26.
- Becker, S. A., Brown, M., Dahlstrom, E., Davis, A., DePaul, K., Diaz, V., & Pomerantz, J. (2018). Horizon report 2018 higher education edition brought to you by EDUCAUSE (pp. 1-54). EDU18.
- Bellman, R. (1978). An introduction to artificial intelligence: can computers think? San Francisco: Boyd & Fraser Pub. Co.
- Buchanan, B. G. (2005). A (very) brief history of artificial intelligence. Al Magazine, 26(4), 53-53.
- Cam, M. B., Celik, N. C., Turan G. E., & Durukan, U. G. (2021). Determination of teacher candidates' awareness of artificial intelligence technologies. Hatay Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 18(48), 263-285.
- Cetin, M. & Aktaş, A. (2021). Artificial intelligence and future scenarios in education, International Journal of Society Research, 11(18), 4225-4268.
- Chassignol, M., Khoroshavin, A., Klimova, A., & Bilyatdinova, A. (2018). Artificial Intelligence trends in education: a narrative overview, Procedia Computer Science, 136, 16-24.
- Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2000). Young children’s ideas about geometric shapes, Teaching Children Mathematics, 6, 482-488.
- Creswell, J.W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design, (translation editors: M. Butun & S.B. Demir, Qualitative research method: qualitative research and research design according to five approaches, Siyasal Bookstore.
- Dogan, A., & Alp, K. (2002). Artificial intelligence. Istanbul, Kariyer Publishing.
- Good, R. (1987). Artificial intelligence and science education, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(4), 325-342.
- Han, L. (2018). Analysis of new advances in the application of artificial intelligence to education, Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 220, 608-611.
- Hodges, B. D. (2020). Ones and zeros: medical education and theory in the age of intelligent machines, Medical Education, 54(8), 691-693.
- Hristov, K. (2016). Artificial intelligence and the copyright dilemma, The Journal of The Franklin Pierce Center for Intellectual Property (IDEA), 57, 431.
- Ic, U. & Tutak, T. (2017). Correlation between computer and mathematical literacy levels of 6th grade students, European Journal of Educational Research, 7(1),63-70.
- Isler, B. & Kilic, Y.M. (2021). The use and development of artificial intelligence in education, e-Journal of Media, 5(1) 1-11.
- Knox, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence and education in China. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 298-311.
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Nabiyev, V. V. (2005). Artificial intelligence: problems-methods-algorithms, second edition, Seckin Publisher, Ankara.
- Ocal, O. (2016). Student modeling with fuzzy logic approach in adaptive intelligent teaching system, Master Thesis, Marmara University, Institute of Science and Technology, Istanbul.
- Osetskyi, V., Vitrenko, A., Tatomyr, I., Bilan, S., & Hirnyk, Y. (2020). Artificıal intelligence application in education: financial implications and prospects. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 2(33), 574-584.
- Tutak, T., Guder, Y. (2014). Opinions of secondary school mathematics teachers on mathematical modelling, Educational Research and Reviews, 9(19), 799-806.
