Investigation of Turkish Education Applied in Science and Art Centers to Gifted Students in Turkey

Author :  

Year-Number: 2021-Volume 13, Issue 5
Yayımlanma Tarihi: 2021-10-05 10:17:07.0
Language : English
Konu : Turkish Education
Number of pages: 1560-1576
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

The aim of this research is to determine the quality of Turkish education in Science and Art Centers (SACs) through the opinions and practices of teachers and students. In this research is a qualitative research where a case study design was adopted. The study group of this research was chosen as 19 teachers and 29 students from various SACs from different regions of Turkey in the 2017- 2018 Academic Year. Data were collected through the semi-structured teacher and student interview forms, semi-structured observations, reflective journaling, and documents. The collected data were analyzed using content analysis and descriptive analysis methods. It was found out that teachers who attend Turkish courses in SACs make different adjustments in curriculum according to the characteristics of gifted students and enrich the activities, use various methods and techniques, use various materials that attract students' attention in the teaching process and different assessment. It has been determined that students have positive opinions about Turkish education in SACs. It will be useful to organize training for teachers in cooperation with universities on new methods and techniques to support differentiation and enrichment. It will be beneficial to develop visually rich, technology-based and game-based materials for SACs Turkish lessons.

Keywords


  • Akarsu, F. (2001). Üstün yetenekli çocuklar, aileleri ve sorunları. [Gifted children, their families and problems]. Ankara: Eduser.

  • Akça-Üşenti, Ü. (2013). Üstün zekâlı ve yetenekli öğrencilere uygulanan farklılaştırılmış Türkçe öğretim uygulamalarının etkililiğinin sınanması. [Testing the effectiveness of differentiated Turkish teaching practices applied to gifted and talented students]. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). İstanbul University/ Institute of Social Sciences, İstanbul.

  • Alevli, O. (2018). Sensitivity of their families on the reading habit of the gifted students. Millî Eğitim Dergisi, 47 (special issue1), 129-142. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/569420

  • Allington, R. (2002). What I've learned from about effective reading ınstruction: From a decade of studying exemplary elementary classroom teachers. Phi Delta Kappan, 10, 740-747. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170208301007

  • Arı, G. (2015). Yaratıcı yazma. [Creative writing]. In F. Şahin (Ed.), Üstün zekâlı ve üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin eğitimi [Education of gifted and talented students]. (pp. 128-170). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

  • Aslan, H. & Doğan, Ü. (2016). Üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin devam ettikleri okulları ile bilim ve sanat merkezine ilişkin metaforik algıları: Karşılaştırmalı durum çalışması. [The metaphorical perception of gifted students in terms their school and the art and science centers in which they participate comparative study], Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16 (2), 335350.

  • Ataman, A. (2014). Üstün zekâlı/üstün yetenekli çocuk ve aile. [Gifted / talented child and family]. In A. Ataman (Ed.), Üstün zekâlılar ve üstün yetenekliler konusunda bilinmesi gerekenler [Things to know about the gifted and talented]. (pp. 83-107). Ankara: Vize.

  • Ateş, M. (2017). Examination of the opinions of Turkish teachers works in science and art centers about individualized education plan. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (42), 211225. https://doi.org/10.21764/efd.70905

  • Austin, K. D. (2011). Giving Voice: A mixed methods study of gifted students’ and their parents’ perceptions of their reading experiences (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation), Oregon State University, College of Education.

  • Ayrancı, B. B. (2013). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin yazma becerilerinin geliştirilmesinde çağrışım tekniğinin kullanımı. [The use of connotation technique for the development of primary school students’ writing ability]. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation), Gazi University/Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.

  • Ayrancı, B. B. & Mete, F. (2017). Bilim ve sanat merkezleri bireyselleştirilmiş eğitim programında Türkçe dersi uygulamalarındaki farklılıklar ve sorunlar. [Differences and issues in individualized Turkish education program applicatıons in science and art centers]. Electronic Turkish Studies, 12(18). http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.12129

  • Balcı, A. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma: Yöntem teknik ve ilkeler. [Research in social sciences: Method techniques and principles]. Ankara: Pegem A.

  • Baş, B. (2015). Türkçe öğretimi açısından çocuk edebiyatı. [Children's literature in terms of teaching Turkish]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

  • Baykoç, N. (2014). Üstün; akıl, zekâ, deha, yetenek, dâhiler- savantlar gelişimleri ve eğitimleri. [Superior; mind, intelligence, genius, talent, geniuses- savant development and education]. Ankara: Vize Basın Yayın.

  • Bi, B. (2020). Öz düzenleyici strateji gelişimi modelinin özel yetenekli öğrencilerin yazma becerilerine etkisi. [The effect of self-regulated strategy development model on improving gifted students' story writing skills]. (Unpublished Master Thesis). Hacettepe University/Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.

  • Bozca, A. İşlekeller (2017). Üstün zekâlı öğrencilerde Türkçe koşut eğitim programının başarıya, eleştirel düşünmeye ve yaratıcılığa etkisi. [The effect of Turkish parallel curriculum instruction on gifted and talented students' achievement, critical thinking skills and creativity]. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). İstanbul University/ Institute of Social Sciences, İstanbul.

  • Cavazos-Kottke, S. (2006). Five readers browsing: The reading interests of talented middle school boys. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(2), 132-147. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620605000205

  • Clark, B. (2012). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at school and at home (8th edition). Boston: Pearson.

  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri, beş yaklaşıma göre nitel araştırma ve araştırma deseni. [Qualitative research methods, qualitative research and research design according to five approaches]. (M. Bütün & S. B. Demir). Ankara: Siyasal.

  • Çitil, M., & Ataman, A. (2018). İlköğretim çağındaki üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin davranışsal özelliklerinin eğitim ortamlarına yansıması ve ortaya çıkabilecek sorunlar. [The reflection of the primary level gifted students’ behavioral characteristics to the educational settings and the problems that may arise]. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 38(1), 185-231. http://www.gefad.gazi.edu.tr/en/download/article-file/462740

  • Dağlıoğlu, H. E. (2014). Erken çocuklukta üstün zekâ/üstün yetenek. [Superior intelligence / giftedness in early childhood]. In A. Ataman (Ed.), Üstün Zekâlılar ve Üstün Yetenekliler Konusunda Bilinmesi Gerekenler (pp. 46-82). Ankara: Vize Basın Yayın.

  • Davaslıgil, U. & Leana, M. Z. (2004). Üstün zekâlıların eğitimi projesi. [Education of gifted children Project]. In (Ed. A. Kulaksızoğlu, A. E. Bilgili & M. R. Şirin), I. Türkiye üstün zekâlı ve yetenekli çocuklar kongresi bildiriler kitabı [Turkey gifted and talented children congress proceedings]. (pp. 85–100). İstanbul: Çocuk Vakfı Yayınları.

  • Dixon, F. A., Prater, K. A., Vine, H. M., Wark, M. J., Williams, T., Hanchon, T. & Shobe, C. (2004). Teaching to their thinking: A strategy to meet the critical-thinking needs of gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28(1), 56-76. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/ 10.1177/016235320402800104

  • Emir, S. (Ed.) (2017). Özel yeteneklilerin eğitiminde program tasarımı. [Program design in the education of gifted] Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

  • Feng X. A., VanTassel‐Baska J., Quek C., Bai W. & O'Neill B. (2004). A longitudinal assessment of gifted students’ learning using the integrated curriculum model (ICM): Impacts and perceptions of the william and mary language arts and science curriculum, Roeper Review, 27(2), 78-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190509554294

  • Fraser-Seeto, K. T., Howard, S. J., & Woodcock, S. (2015). An investigation of teachers’ awareness and willingness to engage with a self-directed professional development package on gifted and talented education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(1), 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n1.1

  • Gagne, F. (2010). Motivation within the DMGT 2.0 framework. High Ability Studies, 1(2), 81– 99. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2010.525341

  • Gregory, G. H. & Chapman, C. (2013). Differentiated instructional strategies: One size doesn’t fit all (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

  • Gunter, G. A. & Kenny, R. F. (2012). UB the director: Utilizing digital book trailers to engage gifted and twice exceptional students in reading. Journal of Gifted Education International, 28(2), 146-160.

  • Güneş, F. (2016). Türkçe öğretimi yaklaşım ve modeller. [Turkish teaching approaches and models]. (4th Edition). Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.

  • Harrison, C. (2004). Giftedness in early childhood: The search for complexity and connection. Roeper Review, 26(2), 78-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190409554246

  • Hırça, N. (2013). Gifted students’ summer science camp experiences. Journal of Gifted Education Research, 1(1), 22-30. https://www.acarindex.com/dosyalar/makale/acarindex-1423937373.pdf

  • İnnalı, H. Ö. (2018). Üstün zekâlı ve yetenekli öğrencilerin yazma sürecinde kullandıkları bilişüstü stratejilerin çeşitli değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. [The investigation of metacognitive strategies used by gifted and talented students in writing process according to some variables]. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Dokuz Eylül University/Institute of Educational Sciences, İzmir.

  • İşlekeller, A. (2008). Eleştirel düşünme becerilerini temel alan Türkçe öğretiminin üstün ve normal zihin düzeyindeki öğrencilerin erişi, eleştirel düşünme düzeylerine ve tutumlarına etkisi. [Achievements of students of above average and average intelligence in Turkish language classes focusing on critical thinking skills, and the effect of those classes on their critical thinking levels and attitudes]. (Unpublished Master Thesis). İstanbul University/ Institute of Social Sciences, İstanbul.

  • Jordan, B. (2015) Developing differentiated reading ınstruction online for gifted third graders: A design experiment (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). University of South Florida, College of

  • Karababa, S. & Kaya, D. (2018). Üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin okuma stratejileri üstbilişsel farkındalıklarının çeşitli değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. [Examining gifted students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies based on certain variables]. Route Educational and Social Science Journal, 5(5),132-147.

  • Karadağ, R. (2010). İlköğretim Türkçe dersinde farklılaştırılmış öğretim yaklaşımının uygulanması: Bir eylem araştırması. [Implementation of differentiated instruction approach in primary education Turkish course: An action research]. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Anadolu University/Institute of Educational Sciences, Eskişehir.

  • Karsak, H. G. (2014). Bireysel ve işbirlikli blogla bütünleştirilmiş yazma öğretiminin normal ve üstün zekâlı öğrencilerin yazma performanslarına etkisi. [The effect of using individual and cooperative blog to enhance average and gifted students’ writing performance]. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Yıldız Teknik University/Institute of Educational Sciences, İstanbul.

  • Keskin, H. K. (2015). Eleştirel okuma ve eleştirel okuma becerilerinin desteklenmesi. [Supporting critical reading and critical reading skills]. In F. Şahin (Ed.), Üstün Zekâlı ve Üstün Yetenekli Öğrencilerin Eğitimi [Education of gifted and talented students] (pp. 174-186). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

  • Koçal, Z.D., Kanar, E., Ermiş, S. & Pınar Kanar, K. (2009, Mart). Bilim ve sanat merkezine devam eden üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin temel ihtiyaçları: Amasya örneği. [Basic needs of gifted students attending the science and art center: Amasya example]. Ulusal Üstün Yetenekli Çocuklar Kongresi, March 25-27; Eskişehir.

  • Leana-Taşcılar, M. Z. (2012). The use of bibliotherapy in classrooms for gifted students: A Bibliotherapy Model. Turkish Journal of Giftedness & Education, 2(2),118-136. http://talentjournal.net/ publications/cilt2/sayi2/2012_2_2_tascilar.pdf

  • Levande, D. (1999). Gifted readers and reading ınstruction. CAG Communicator, 30(1), 1-5. https://www.hoagiesgifted.org/levande_print.htm

  • Mathia, K. (2015) Impact of an afterschool science ebook club for gifted and talented elementary students (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation), The School of Education St. John’s Unıversity.

  • Mcgirt, S. (2017). Improving academic self-efficacy in reading comprehension skills of 8th grade gifted and talented students (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation), Northcentral University Graduate Faculty of the School of Education.

  • Mert, E. (2018). Üstün zekâlı ve yetenekli öğrencilerin okuma sürecinde kullandıkları stratejiler üzerine bir araştırma. [A research on reading strategies used by gifted and talented students] (Unpublished Master Thesis). Dokuz Eylül University/Institute of Educational Sciences, İzmir.

  • Merriam, S. B. (1995). What can you tell from an N of 1?: Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning, 4, 51-60. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ497233

  • Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.

  • Ministry of National Education [MoNE] (2016). Science and art centers directive. Ankara, Turkey.https://orgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2016_10/07031350_bilsem_yonergesi.pdf

  • Okur, A. & Alevli, O. (2018). New media literacy skills in gifted studentsika. Croatian Journal of Education: Hrvatski časopis za odgoj i obrazovanje, 20(1), 265-289. https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v20i1.2553

  • Okur, A. & Özsoy, Y. (2013). Üstün zekâlı öğrencilerin Türkçe dersine yönelik tutumlarının incelenmesi: Bartın BİLSEM örneği. [A research for the attitudes of gifted students' towards turkish lesson: A sample of Bartın BİLSEM]. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 9(3), 254-264. http://acikerisim.lib.comu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/COMU/1169

  • Okur, A. & Özsoy, Y. (2017). Üstün zekâlı ve üstün yetenekli ortaokul öğrencilerinin okuma ilgisi ve okuma alışkanlıklarının değerlendirilmesi. [Evaluation of reading interest and reading habits of gifted and talented secondary school students]. Üstün Zekâlılar Eğitimi ve Yaratıcılık Dergisi, 4(3), 73-89. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jgedc/issue/38703/449456

  • Olthouse, J. M. (2012). Talented young writers’ relationships with writing. Journal for The Education of The Gifted, 35(1), 66-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353211432039

  • Olthouse, J. M. & Miller, M. T. (2012). Teaching talented writers with web 2.0 tools. Teaching Exceptional Children, 45(2), 6-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991204500201

  • Özbey, N., Çetinkaya, H., Demir, A., Dolaş, F. & Tereci, A. (2017, May). Özel yetenek ile uyumlu öğretimin akademik başarıya etkisi. [The effect of teaching compatible with special talent on academic success]. International Talented And Gifted Conference: New Approaches and Educational Practices, 4-5 May 2017, Ankara.

  • Özdemir, Ö. (2010). Üstün yetenekli öğrencilerde yaratıcı yazma çalışmalarının düzeyleri ilköğretim 6, 7, 8. sınıf örneği. [Levels of creative writing works of gifted students (grade 6, 7 and 8)]. (Unpublished Master Thesis). Marmara University/Institute of Educational Sciences, İstanbul.

  • Özsoy, Y. (2015). Özel yetenekli (üstün zekâlı ve yetenekli) ortaokul öğrencilerinde yazma kaygısı. [Writing anxiety in gifted secondary school students]. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Sakarya University/Institute of Educational Sciences, Sakarya.

  • Peterson, J., Duncan, N., & Canady, K. (2009). Longitudinal study of negative life events, stress, and school experiences of gifted youth. Gifted Child Quarterly. 53(1), 34-49. https://doi.org/10. 1177/

  • Reis, S., Gubbins, E., Briggs, C., Schreiber, F., Richards, S., Jacobs, … & Renzulli, J. (2004). Reading instruction for talented readers: Case studies documenting few opportunities for continuous progress. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(4), 315-338. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620404800406

  • Sak, U. & Maker, C. J. (2004). DISCOVER assessment and curriculum model: The application of theories of multiple intelligences and successful intelligence in the education of gifted students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 15, 1-15. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ugur-Sak/ publication/264671605

  • Sak, U. (2017). Üstün zekâlılar: Özellikleri, tanılanmaları, eğitimleri. [Gifted: Characteristics, diagnosis, education]. Ankara: Vize Yayıncılık.

  • Saluk, N. & Pilav, S. (2018). Üstün yeteneklilerde yaratıcı yazma becerilerinin geliştirilmesi üzerine bir araştırma. [A research on the development of creative writing skills in gifted]. Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(3), 2191-2215. http://dx.doi.org/10.29299/kefad.2018.19.03.011

  • Shanahan, T., Fisher, D. & Frey, N. (2012). The challenge of challenging text. Educational Leadership, 69(6), 58-62. http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/mar12/vol69/num06/TheChallenge -of-Challenging-Text.aspx

  • Shore, B. M. & Delacourt, M. A. B. (1996). Effective curricular and program practices in gifted education and the ınterface with general education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 138-154.

  • Silverman, L. K. (1992). How parents can support gifted children. ERIC Publications. (ERIC Digest No: ED352776, E#515). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED352776

  • Smutny, J. F. (2001). Creative strategies for teaching language arts to gifted students (K-8). ERIC Digest E612. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED455659.pdf

  • Soares, L. B. (2009). An investigation of literature circles and critical literacy: differentiated learning opportunities for high-ability students (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation), University of North Carolina.

  • Şahin, C. (2020). Özel yetenekli öğrencilerin kurguladığı yaratıcı yazma çalışmalarında “deus ex machina”. [“Deus Ex Machina” in creative writing examples of gifted students]. Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi, 8(2), 611-627.

  • Şahin, F. (2015a). Üstün zekâlı öğrencilerin eğitimine yönelik eğitsel stratejiler. [Educational strategies for the education of gifted students]. In F. Şahin (Ed.) Üstün Zekâlı ve Üstün Yetenekli Öğrencilerin Eğitimi (pp. 3-14). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

  • Şahin, F. (2015b). Genel eğitim sınıflarındaki üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin eğitiminde müfredat farklılaştırma. [Curriculum differentiation in the education of gifted students in general education classes]. In F. Şahin (Ed.), Üstün Zekâlı ve Üstün Yetenekli Öğrencilerin Eğitimi (pp. 2038). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

  • Tanrıkulu, F. & Yoğurtçu, M. (2018). Özel yetenekli öğrencilerin eğitiminde masalları drama yöntemiyle işlemenin Türkçe dersine etkisi. [The effect of teaching fairy tales to the gifted students through drama on Turkish lesson]. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim Dergisi, 7(4), 2572-2590.

  • Tomlinson, C. A. (2000). Differentiation of instruction in the elementary grades. ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED443572.pdf

  • Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). Öğrenci gereksinimlerine göre farklılaştırılmış eğitim. [The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners]. (Trans. Diye Kültürlerarası İletişim Hizmetleri). (2. Ed.). İstanbul: Redhouse Eğitim Kitapları.

  • Tortop, H. S. (2015). Üstün zekâlılar eğitiminde farklılaştırılmış öğretim müfredat farklılaştırma modelleri. [Differentiated teaching curriculum differentiation models in gifted education]. Düzce: Genç Bilge.

  • Türkman, B. (2017). Genel öğretim programını özel yetenekli öğrencilerin ihtiyaçlarına göre farklılaştırma stratejileri. [Differentiation strategies of general education curriculum according to the needs of gifted students]. In S. Emir (Ed.), Özel Yeteneklilerin Eğitiminde Program Tasarımı [Program design in the education of gifted] (pp.25-43). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

  • Ünal, D. (2019). Özel yetenekli öğrencilerin okuma alışkanlığına yönelik tutumları ile yazma eğilimleri. [Attitudes towards reading habits and writing tendencies of gifted and talented students]. (Unpublished Master Thesis). Sakarya University/Institute of Educational Sciences, Sakarya.

  • Ünal, D., Demirtaş, Z. & Gür Erdoğan, D. (2018). Üstün/özel yetenekli öğrencilerde okuma alışkanlığı. [Reading habit in gifted / talented students]. Millî Eğitim Dergisi, 1, 109-127.

  • VanTassel-Baska, J. (2003). Differentiating the language arts for high ability learners K–8. ERIC Digest. VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ ED474306.pdf

  • VanTassel-Baska, J. & Johnsen, S. K. (2007). Teacher education standards for the field of gifted education: A vision of coherence for personnel preparation in the 21st century. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(2), 182-205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207299880

  • VanTassel-Baska, J., Johnson, D., Hughes, C. & Boyce, L. (1996). A study of language arts curriculum effectiveness with gifted learners. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 461480.https://doi.org/10.1177/016235329601900405

  • Vosslamber, A. (2002). Gifted readers: Who are they, and how can they be served in the classroom? Gifted Child Today, 25(2), 14-20. https://doi.org/10.4219/gct-2002-55

  • Weber, C. L. & Cavanaugh, T. W. (2006). Promoting reading: Using eBooks with gifted and advanced readers. Gifted Child Today, 29(4), 56-63. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ746309.pdf

  • Wood, P. F. (2008). Reading instruction with gifted and talented readers: A series of unfortunate events or a sequence of auspicious results? Gifted Child Today, 31(3),16-25. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ803362.pdf

  • Worrell, F. C., Roth, D. A., & Gabelko, N. H. (2007). Elementary reading attitude survey (ERAS) scores in academically talented students. Roeper Review, 29(2), 119-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/

  • Yalçın, A. (2018). Son bilimsel gelişmeler ışığında Türkçenin öğretimi yöntemleri. [Teaching methods of Turkish in the light of the latest scientific developments]. Ankara: Akçağ Yayınları.

  • Yaylacık A. (2014). Üstün yetenekli beşinci sınıf öğrencilerinin öyküleyici metin yazma becerileri. [Highly gifted 5th grade students' narrative text writing skills]. (Unpublished Master Thesis). Mustafa Kemal University/ Institute of Social Sciences, Hatay.

  • Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. (10th Ed.). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

  • Yıldız, C. (2013). Ana dili öğretimi. In C. Yıldız, (Ed.). Yeni Öğretim Programına Göre Kuramdan Uygulamaya Türkçe Öğretimi. [Teaching Turkish From Theory to Practice According to the New Curriculum]. (4th Ed., pp. 45-76). Ankara: Pegema Yayınları.

  • Yıldız, N. (2018). Bilim ve sanat merkezlerinde görev yapan Türkçe öğretmenlerinin ders materyali geliştirme/kullanma durumlarının incelenmesi. [The investigation of the course material development / use of Turkish teachers working in science and art centers]. (Unpublished Master Thesis). Necmettin Erbakan University/ Institute of Educational Sciences, Konya.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics