Analysis of Thinking Skills Targeted for Development by Activities in Life Science Textbooks

Author :  

Year-Number: 2021-Volume 13, Issue 2
Yayımlanma Tarihi: 2021-04-10 14:45:26.0
Language : English
Konu : Life Science Textbooks
Number of pages: 390-412
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

In this research, the aim was to complete a broad description related to activities included in life science textbooks. Within the scope of this description, the aim was to investigate the distributions in terms of thinking skills targeted for development with activities, the aim, learning experience for the student, form of work, and sources required for the activity included in life science textbooks. The research adopted the document investigation method from among qualitative research models. The study group for the research included a total of 497 activities included in 3 life science books which were published in the year 2018 and had open access in the electronic environment through the educational information network (EBA) platform. The research findings show textbooks targeted development of 16 different thinking skills. More than half of the activities focused on the thinking skills of explanation, recall, and differentiation. Activities with the aim of preparing for learning appeared to have the highest rate. The form of study was basically analysis, with the activity rate in the form of group study below 2%. When activities in life science textbooks are investigated in terms of the learning experience for students, 9.5% of activities directed towards thinking about real-life situations, while 2.6% directed toward solving real-life problems. Finally, nearly all activities included in the textbooks examined could be completed with preliminary learning of the student and information found in the textbook. The number of activities in life science textbooks developing higher-order thinking skills, deepening learning, with group work for students and directing towards primary and secondary information sources should be increased. More weight should be given to activities structured on the basis of real-life situations in textbooks.

Keywords

Abstract

In this research, the aim was to complete a broad description related to activities included in life science textbooks. Within the scope of this description, the aim was to investigate the distributions in terms of thinking skills targeted for development with activities, the aim, learning experience for the student, form of work, and sources required for the activity included in life science textbooks. The research adopted the document investigation method from among qualitative research models. The study group for the research included a total of 497 activities included in 3 life science books which were published in the year 2018 and had open access in the electronic environment through the educational information network (EBA) platform. The research findings show textbooks targeted development of 16 different thinking skills. More than half of the activities focused on the thinking skills of explanation, recall, and differentiation. Activities with the aim of preparing for learning appeared to have the highest rate. The form of study was basically analysis, with the activity rate in the form of group study below 2%. When activities in life science textbooks are investigated in terms of the learning experience for students, 9.5% of activities directed towards thinking about real-life situations, while 2.6% directed toward solving real-life problems. Finally, nearly all activities included in the textbooks examined could be completed with preliminary learning of the student and information found in the textbook. The number of activities in life science textbooks developing higher-order thinking skills, deepening learning, with group work for students and directing towards primary and secondary information sources should be increased. More weight should be given to activities structured on the basis of real-life situations in textbooks.

Keywords


  • Açıkgöz, K. Ü. (2002). Aktif öğrenme. İzmir: Eğitim Dünyası Yayınları.

  • Akınoğlu, O. (2003). Hayat bilgisi öğretimi. In C. Öztürk, & D. Dilek (Ed.) Hayat bilgisi ve sosyal bilgiler öğretimi (p.1-13). Ankara: Pagem Akademi.

  • Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing. A revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman: New York.

  • Avcı, E. K., & Faiz, M. (2018). Investigation of the skills and values in the "Effective Citizenship" theme in 4th and 5th-grade social studies textbooks. International Journal of New Approaches in Social Studies (IJONASS), 2(1), 1-21. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/503075

  • Aydemir, M., & Adamaz, K. (2017). Examination of student workbooks on social studies in terms of student skills achieved by social studies curriculum. International Journal of Field Education, 3(1), 106-119. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/334551

  • Bayrak-Özmutlu, E. (2020). Outcomes social studies curriculum based on thinking skills. Turkish Studies - Education, 15(1), 15-32. Doi: 10.29228/TurkishStudies.40359.

  • Baysal, Z. N., Çarıkçı, S., & Yaşar, E. B. (2016). Classroom teachers’ awareness of teaching thinking skills. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 5(1), 7-28. Doi: 10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.5c1s1m

  • Bektaş, M., Sellum, F, S. & Polat, D. (2019). An examination of the 2018 life study lesson Curriculum in terms of 21st-century learning and innovation skills. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 9(1), 129147. Doi: 10.19126/suje.537104

  • Beyer, B. (1984). Improving thinking skills: Practical approaches. The Phi Delta Kappan, 65(8), 556-560. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20387119?seq=1

  • Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). In Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Bloom, B. S. (Ed.) (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: Longmans, Gren And Company Inc.

  • Candan, D. G., & Ergen, G. (2014). Analysis of the 3rd class life science textbooks about that including fundamental universal values. Uşak University Journal of Social Sciences, 7(1), 134-161. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/202223

  • Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39, 124-130. Doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2

  • Çoban, O., & Akşit, İ. (2018). Comparison of 2005 and 2017 social studies curriculum in terms of learning area, acquisition, concept, value, and skill. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 7(1), 479-505. Doi: 10.7596/taksad.v7i1.1395

  • Covill, A. E. (2011). College students perceptions of the traditional lecture method. College Student Journal, 45(1), 2-15. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ996351

  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design. (G. Hacıömeroğlu, Çev.). Demir, Ş. B. (Ed.). Ankara: Eğiten Kitap.

  • Demirkaya, H. (2017). Sosyal bilgiler öğretiminde ders kitabı. In R. Sever, & E. Koçoğlu Sosyal bilgiler öğretiminde eğitim teknolojileri ve materyal tasarımı. (87-101). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

  • Doğan, H. (2014). The standard basic skills' level of existence took part in the primary school curriculum in workbook activities. (Thesis no: 372296). [Unpublished master’s thesis, Marmara University, Institute of Education Sciences, İstanbul].

  • EARGED, MEB (2008). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin hizmet içi eğitim ihtiyaçlarının belirlenmesi. Ankara: MEB Yayınları.

  • Erol, B., & Kıroğlu, K. (2012). The evaluation of ‘Science of Life’ textbooks in terms of language and expression. Selçuk University Journal of Turkic Studies, 32, 155-176. http://sutad.selcuk.edu.tr/sutad/article/view/570/558

  • Ertürk, M., & Güler, E. (2017). 5. 6. ve 7. sınıf sosyal bilgiler ders kitaplarının öğretmen görüşlerine göre incelenmesi (Muğla ili örneği). Uluslararası Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2017(8), 64-76.

  • Faruji, L. F. (2012). Teachers' teaching styles at the English Language institute in Iran. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education, 2(1), 364-373.

  • Gelen, İ. (2017). P21- 21st-century skill frameworks in curriculum and instruction (USA Practices). Journal of Interdisciplinary Educational Research, 1(2), 15-29. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/articlefile/386403

  • Gagne, R. M., & Briggs, L. J. (1979). Principles of instructional design (2nd Ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, And Winston.

  • Gözütok, F. D., Taş, İ. D., Rüzgar, M. E., Akçatepe, A. G., & Yetkiner, A. (2015). Evaluation of primary school first-grade life studies books. Elementary Education Online, 14(3), 825-844. Doi: 10.17051/io.2015.45371

  • Gülüm, K., & Çeltik, D. (2014). Investigation and recommendations to improve the quality of workbook and textbook of life science education on the 2'nd class of the primary school. Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Literature Journal of Social Sciences, 38(1), 46-58. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/49930

  • Güler, A., Halıcıoğlu, M., & Taşğın, S. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

  • Gündoğan, A. (2017). The reflection of the attitudes and learning processes to learning environments with authentic tasks in life science class. (Thesis no: 458657). [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Anadolu University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Eskişehir].

  • Gürdoğan-Bayır, Ö. (2015). Examining the improvement of conflict resolution skills in the elementary fourth grade Social Studies course. (Thesis no: 395189). [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Anadolu University,

  • Güven, S., & Püsküllü, M. A. (2017). The content analysis of the studies about life science textbooks. The Journal of International Lingual Social and Educational Sciences, 3(2), 75-86.

  • Güven, S. (2010). The evaluation of primary education life sciences coursebooks and workbooks according to the teachers’ views. Education and Science, 35(156), 84-95. http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/97/233

  • Haladyna, T. M. (1997). Writing test items to evaluate higher-order thinking. Boston: Allyn And Bacon.

  • Harari, Y. N. (2018). 21.yüzyıl için 21 ders. Şiral, S. (Çev.), İstanbul: Kolektif Kitap.

  • İlter, İ. (2018). A review of teachers' teaching methods and practices about social studies instruction. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 11(1), 1-29. Doi: 10.30831/akukeg.338520

  • Johnson, S., & Siegel, H. (2010). Teaching thinking: Key debates in educational policy. In C. Winch (Ed.), On thinking skills (113–125). London: Uk Continuum Press.

  • Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches: Mixed methods (A. Türkdoğan, Çev.). Ankara: Eğiten Kitap.

  • Kabapınar, Y. (2014). Kuramdan uygulamaya sosyal bilgiler öğretimi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

  • Kabapınar, Y. (2007). The presentation of social issues and values in the primary social studies textbooks written in the 1998 and 2004 curricula: Have we moved to a different stage regarding function and quality? Marmara University Atatürk Faculty of Education Journal of Educational Sciences, 25(25), 109127. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1645

  • Kabapınar, Y., & Akbal, Y. (2010). Classroom teachers’ viewpoints on “Life Studies” textbooks written in the line of 1998 and 2004 primary programs. Marmara University Atatürk Faculty of Education Journal of Educational Sciences, 32(32), 95-122. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1683

  • Karabağ, G. (2009). Hayat bilgisi dersinin tarihçesi. In B. Tay (Ed.) Hayat bilgisi öğretimi. Ankara: Maya Akademi.

  • Kaya, N., Artvinli, E., & Önal, H. (2007, 15-17 Kasım). Sosyal bilgiler programına göre öğrenci çalışma kitaplarının beceri ve değerleri gerçekleştirebilme düzeyi. I. Ulusal İlköğretim Kongresi’nde sunulmuştur. Ankara.

  • Kutlu, Ö., Doğan, C. D., & Karakaya, İ. (2010). Öğrenci başarısının değerlendirilmesi. performansa ve portfolyoya dayalı durum belirleme. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

  • Larson, L. C., & Miller, T. N. (2011). 21st-century skills: prepare students for the future. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 47(3), 121-123. Doi: 10.1080/00228958.2011.10516575

  • Marzano, R. J. (2001). Designing a new taxonomy of educational objectives. Thousand Oak, California: Corwin Press, Inc.

  • Mesleki Yeterlilikler Kurumu (2015). Türkiye yeterlilikler çerçevesi. Resmi Gazete 29581.

  • Miles, B. M., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. London: International Educational and Professional Publisher.

  • Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB]. (2018). Sosyal bilgiler dersi öğretim programı (4-8 sınıflar). Ankara: Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları.

  • Orhan Göksün, D., & Kurt, A. A. (2017). The relationship between pre-service teachers’ use of 21st-century learner skills and 21st-century teacher skills. Education and Science, 42(190). Doi: 10.15390/EB.2017.7089

  • Oh, P. S., & Kim, K. S. (2013). Pedagogical transformations of science content knowledge in Korean elementary classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 35(9), 1590-1624. Doi: 10.1080/09500693.2012.719246

  • Education and Science, 40(181), 271-292. Doi: 10.15390/EB.2015.4363

  • Öztürk, T., & Özkan, Z. S. (2018). Investigation of texts and images in life science textbooks in terms of values. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 6(1), 172-204. Doi: 10.14689/issn.21482624.1.6c1s8m

  • Öztürk, T., & Öğreten, A. (2017). Teachers' opinions about the sufficiency of social studies textbooks to gain the 2005 year’s social studies curriculum skills. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 7(2), 234-259. Doi: 10.18039/ajesi.333727

  • Patton, M. Q. (2014). Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

  • Resnick, L. B. (1987). The thinking curriculum. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

  • Resnick, L. B. (2010). Nested learning systems for the thinking curriculum. Educational Researcher. 39(3), 183- 197. Doi: 10.3102/0013189X10364671

  • Romiszowski, A. J. (1981). A new look at ınstructional design. Part I. learning: Restructuring one's concepts. British Journal of Educational Technology, 12(1), 19-48.

  • Saldana, J. (2013). The coding of manual for qualitative researchers. Sage Publications.

  • Sarıtaş, E., & Şahin, Ü. (2019). An examination of gender roles in social sciences course books. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 48, 463-477. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/articlefile/555268

  • Scott, J., & Marshall, G. (2015). A dictionary of sociology (3 revs. ed.). London: Oxford University Press.

  • Semerci, N., & Yanpar Yelken, T. (2010). Teacher views regarding common basic skills in primary school curricula (Example of Elazığ Provınce). Fırat University Journal of Eastern Studies, 8(2), 47-54.

  • Senemoğlu, N. (2011). College of education students’ approaches to learning and study skills. Education and Science, 36(160), 65-80. http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/335/260

  • Tabak, S., & Yaylak, E. (2020). The place of root values in social studies textbook. International Journal of Eurasian Education and Culture, 8, 1-51. Doi: 10.35826/ijoecc.58

  • Taş, H., & Kıroğlu, K. (2018). Assessment of the 2017 primary school social studies curriculum according to teachers' views. Elementary Education Online, 17(2), 697-716. Doi: 10.17051/ilkonline.2018.419041

  • Taşkıran, C. (2014). To investigate in terms of the thinking skills to gains of sixth-grade social studies curriculum. International Turkish Journal of Educational Sciences, 2, 1-13. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/goputeb/issue/7322/95815

  • Tay, B., & Baş, M. (2016). 2009 ve 2015 yılı hayat bilgisi dersi öğretim programlarının karşılaştırılması. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(2), 341-374.

  • Uçuş Güldalı, Ş., & Demirbaş, İ. (2017). Examination of the spirality of the preschool curriculum and 1st- grade social studies curriculum. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 13(3), 1084-1105. Doi: 10.17860/mersinefd.322800

  • Ütkür, N. (2018) An examination of the articles on life studies and social studies textbooks between 2005- 2018. Gazi Journal of Education Sciences, 4(3), 1-11. Doi: 10.30855/gjes.2018.04.03.001

  • Yıldırım, A. (2006). Teachers' opinions about the new primary school program concerning to natural studies coursebook (Case of Elazığ city). (Thesis no:187119). [Unpublished Master's Thesis, Fırat University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Elazig].

  • Zayimoğlu-Öztürk, F. (2020). Thinking skills and their place in children's universities. In M. Kilinç, & İ. Kösterelioğlu. Children's University in Turkey. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics