The Relationship Between Profession Choice Motivations and School Alienation States of Prospective Physical Education Teachers: An Examination of Gender Differences

Author :  

Year-Number: 2019-Volume 11, Issue 5
Language : null
Konu :
Number of pages: 248-258
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, beden eğitimi ve spor öğretmen adaylarının alan ve meslek seçimi motivasyonları ile okula yabancılaşma durumları arasındaki ilişkiyi, cinsiyet değişkenine göre değerlendirilmesidir. Çalışmaya, Ege Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Fakültesinde öğrenim gören 174 (106 erkek, 68 kadın) öğretmen adayı katılım göstermiştir. Çalışmada analiz edilen veriler, meslek ve alan seçimi motivasyon ve okula yabancılaşma ölçekleri kullanılarak elde edilmiştir. Çalışmanın amacı kapsamında cinsiyet değişkeni dikkate alınarak gerçekleştirilen kanonik korelasyon analiz sonuçları, veri setlerinden elde edilen ilk iki fonksiyonun istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Araştırma bulguları, erkek öğretmen adayları için içsel alan seçimi motivasyonları ile anlamsızlık ve dışsal alan seçimi motivasyonları ile güçsüzlük boyutlarının ön plana çıktığını göstermiştir. Kadın öğretmen adaylarında ise bu durum, dışsal alan seçimi motivasyonu ile anlamsızlık ve içsel meslek seçimi motivasyonu ile güçsüzlük boyutları şeklinde gerçekleşmiştir. Sonuç olarak, içsel motivasyonun kadın adaylarda yabancılaşma durumunu azalttığı, dışsal motivasyon faktörlerinin ise erkek adaylarda yabancılaşmayı arttırdığı belirlenmiştir. Bunun yanı sıra, ortaya çıkan bu bulgusal farklılıkların, akademik alana, meslek gruplarına ve cinsiyete toplum tarafından atfedilen rollerin etkisinden kaynaklandığı düşünülmektedir.

Keywords

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between profession and field choice motivations and school alienation states of prospective physical education and sports teachers in terms of gender. Participants were 174 (106 men, 68 women) prospective physical education and sports teachers attending Ege University Faculty of Sports Sciences. Data were collected using the Motivation Scale on Teaching Profession and Field Choice and the Student Alienation Scale. The canonical correlation analyses produced two significant functions indicating that intrinsic field choice motivation, meaninglessness, extrinsic field choice motivation and weakness were predictive for male prospective teachers. For female prospective teachers, extrinsic field choice motivation, meaninglessness, intrinsic profession choice motivation and weakness were predictive. As a result, intrinsic motivation factors decreased alienation for women while extrinsic motivation factors increased alienation levels for men. The resulting gender differences in our findings are discussed in relation to how academic fields and professions are gendered by society.

Keywords


  • Alon, S., & DiPrete, T. A. (2015). Gender differences in the formation of a field of study choice set. Sociological Science, 2(5), 50–81.

  • Anderson, L. W. (1988). Attitude measurement: Attitudes and their measurement, In: J.P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research methodology and measurement: An International handbook, New York: Elsevier Science & Technology Books.

  • Apriyanti, H. (2016). Alienation among University of Indonesia’s psychology students: A comparative study amongst first-year, second-year, and third-year students. Makara Hubs-Asia, 20(1), 37-45.

  • Arcidiacono, P., Aucejo, E. M., & Spenner, K. (2012). What happens after enrollment? An analysis of the time path of racial differences in gpa and major choice. IZA Journal of Labor Economics, 1(5), 1-24.

  • Ardenska, A., Tomik, R, Berber, S., Düz, B., Çivak, B., Çalişkan, U., & Ogrodnik, J. (2016). A comparison of physical education students’ motivation using polish and Turkish versions of the academic motivation scale. Journal of Human Kinetics, 54, 207-218.

  • Kathleen M. A., Kathleen R. A., & Robyn L. J. (1998). Physical education teachers’ lives and careers: PE, sport and educational status (1st ed.). Basingstoke: Falmer Press.

  • Atav, E., & Altunoglu, B. D. (2013). Meslek ve alan seçiminde motivasyon ölçeğinin Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the motivation scale on teaching profession and field choice]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğtim Fakültesi Dergisi Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 28(2), 58-70.

  • Beutel, A. M., & Marini, M. M. (1995). Gender and Values. American Sociological Review 60(3), 436–448.

  • Brown, D. (2002). Career choice and development-introduction to theories of career development and choice- origins, evolution, and current efforts (4th ed). San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.

  • Brown, M., R., Higgins, K., & Paulsen, K. (2003). Adolescent alienation: What is it and what can educators do about it? Intervention in School and Clinic, 39(1), 3-9.

  • Carrington, B. (2002). A quintessentially feminine domain? Student teachers’ constructions of primary teaching as a career. Educational Studies, 28(3), 287-302.

  • Çağlar, Ç.. (2012). Öğrenci yabancılaşma ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. [Development of the student alienation scale]. Eğitim ve Bilim [Education and science], 37(166), 195-205.

  • Dündar, H., & Lewis, D. R. (1999). Equity, quality and efficiency effects of reform in Turkish higher education. Higher Education Policy, 12(4), 343–366.

  • Eccles, J. S. (2007). Where are all the women? Gender differences in participation in physical science and engineering. In S.J. Ceci & W.M. Williams (Eds.), Why Aren't More Women in Science? Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

  • Ekinci, N. (2017). Öğretmen adaylarının öğretmenlik mesleği ve alan seçiminde etkili olan motivasyonel etkenler [Preservice teachers’ motivational factors affecting their teaching profession and field choices]. İlköğretim Online [Elementary Education Online], 16(2), 394-405.

  • Erbaş, M. K. (2014). The relationship between alienation levels of physical education teacher candidates and their attitudes towards the teaching profession. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(8), 37-52.

  • Erten, I. H. (2014). Understanding the reasons behind choosing to teach English as a foreign language. Novitas- ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 8(1), 30-44

  • Fromm, E. (2005). Sağlıklı toplum [The sane society] (4th ed.). (Z., Tanrısever & Y. Salman, Trans.). Istanbul: Payel Yayınları. (Original Press, 1955).

  • Gabay-Egozi, L., Shavit, Y., & Yaish, M. (2015). Gender differences in fields of study: the role of significant others and rational choice motivations. European Sociological Review, 31(3), 284-297.

  • Gneezy, U., Niederle, M., & Rustichini, A. (2003). Performance in competitive environments: gender differences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), 1049–1074.

  • Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 3-13.

  • Hadjar, A., Backes, S., & Gysin, S. (2015). School alienation, patriarchal gender-role orientations and the lower educational success of boys. A Mixed-method Study. Masculinities and Social Change, 4(1), 85-116.

  • Hascher, T. & Hagenauer, G. (2010). Alienation from school. International Journal of Educational Research, 49(6), 220-232.

  • Hatch, A. J. (1999). What preservice teachers can learn from studies of teachers work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(3), 229–242.

  • Hendry, B. L. (1975). Survival in a marginal role: The Professional identity of the physical education teacher. The British Journal of Sociology, 26(4), 465-476.

  • Jacobs, J. E., Finken, L. L., Griffin, N. L., & Wright, J. D. (1998). The career plans of science-talented rural adolescent girls. American Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 681-704.

  • Karahan, F. T., Sardoğan, M. E., Özkamali, E., & Dicle, A. N. (2006). Öğretmen adaylarında demokratik tutum, nevrotik eğilimler ve kendini gerçekleştirme [Democratic attitude, neurotic tendencies and self actualization in prospective-teachers]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Hacettepe University Journal of Education], 30, 149-158.

  • Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: an overwiew of their current status. Hillsdate, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

  • Klomegah, R. Y. (2006). Social factors relating to alienation experienced by international students in the United States. College Student Journal, 40(2), 1-10.

  • Konrad, A. M., Corrigall, E., Lieb, P., & Ritchie, E. J. (2000). Sex differences in job attribute preferences among managers and business students. Group & Organization Management, 25(2), 108-131.

  • Konrad, A. M., Ritchie, E. J., Lieb, P., & Corrigall, E. (2000). Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126(4), 593–641.

  • Lacy, W. B., Bokemeier, J. L., & Shepard, J. M. (1980). Job attribute preferences and work commitment of men and women in the United States. Personnel Psychology 36(2): 315-329.

  • Lortie, D. C. (2002). Schoolteacher: A sociological study (2nd ed.). The University of Chicago Press: USA.

  • Macdonald, D. (1995). The role of proletarianization in physical education teacher attrition. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 66(2), 129-141.

  • Mackey, J. (1974) The dimension of adolescent alienation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, USA.

  • Marshall, G. (1999). Sosyoloji Sözlüğü (O. Akınhay & D. Kömürcü, Trans.). Ankara: Bilim ve Sanat Kitabevi Yayınları.

  • Martin, B. L., & Briggs, L. J. (1986). Other dimensions of the effective domain: Emotional development and feelings, interest and motivation, social development and group dynamics, attributions. In B.L.M. Martin, & L.J. Brigg (Eds.), The affective and cognitive domains: Integration for ınstruction and research. New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications Englewood Cliffs, Academic Press.

  • Mau, R. Y. (1992). The validity and devolution of a concept: Student alienation. Journal of Adolescence 27(107): 721-741.

  • Mayr, J. (1998). Motive für die studien- und berufswahl. Fragebögen zur erkundung des lehrens und lernens an der pädagogischen akademie. Eine materialsammlung. Linz: Pädagogische Akademie der Diözese Linz.

  • Montecinos C., & Nielsen L. E. (1997). Gender and cohort differences in university students‘ decisions to become elementary teacher education majors. Journal of Teacher Education, 48(1), 47-54.

  • Montmarquette, C., Cannings K. & Mahseredjian S. (2002). How do young people choose college majors? Economics of Education Review, 21(6), 543–556.

  • Morinaj, J., Scharf, J., Grecu, A., Hadjar, A., Hascher, T. & Marcin, K. (2017). School alienation: A construct validation study. Frontline Learning Research, 5(2), 36-59.

  • Myers, D. G. (2004). Motivation. In D.G. Myers (Ed.). Psychology (7th Ed.). New York, NY: Worth Publishers.

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2005). Teachers Matter: Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers. Paris: OECD Publishing.

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2004). Learning for tomorrow's world: First results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD Publishing.

  • Oerlemans, K., & Jenkins, H. (1998). There are aliens in our school. Issues in Educational Research 8(2): 117-129.

  • Pohlmann, B. & Möller, J. (2010). Fragebogen zur erfassung der motivation für die wahl des lehramtsstudiums (FEMOLA) [Motivation for choosing teacher education questionnaire]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie [German Journal of Educational Psychology], 24(1), 73-84.

  • Richardson, P. W., & Watt, M. G. (2006). Who chooses teaching and why? Profiling characteristics and motivations across three Australian universities. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 34(1): 27-56.

  • Saban, A. (2003). A Turkish profile of prospective elementary school teachers and their views of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(8), 829-846.

  • Seeman, M. (1959). On the meaning of alienation. American Sociological Review 24(6): 783-791.

  • Sinclair, C. (2008). Initial and changing student teacher motivation and commitment to teaching. Asia-Pacific Journal of TeacherEducation, 36(2), 79–104.

  • Şimşek, H. & Akdemir, Ö. A. (2015). Üniversite öğrencilerinde okula yabancılaşma [School alienation of university students]. Current Research in Education, 1(1), 1-12.

  • Tucker-Ladd, P. R. (1989). Adolescent alienation and student perceptions of school climate. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.

  • UNESCO. (2015). The right to education and the teaching profession: Overview of the measures supporting the rights, status and working conditions of the teaching profession reported on by member states. Paris: UNESCO.

  • Van De Werfhorst, H. G., Sullivan, A., & Cheung, S. Y. (2003). Social class, ability and choice of subject in secondary and tertiary education in Britain. British Educational Research Journal, 29(1), 41–62.

  • Watt, M. G. & Richardson, P. W. (2007). Motivational factors influencing teaching as a careerchoice: Development and validation of the FIT-choice scale. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75(3), 167-202.

  • Williamson, I. & Cullingford, C. (1998). Adolescent alienation: Its correlates and conseqences. Educational Studies Journal, 24(3), 211-333.

  • Yazici, H. (2009). Öğretmenlik mesleği, motivasyon kaynakları ve tutumlar: kuramsal bir bakış [Teaching profession sources of motivation and basic attitudes: a theoretical overview]. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi [Kastamonu Education Journal], 17(1), 33-46.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics