Contributions of Inquiry-Based Hands-on Physics Activities to Turkish Elementary Science Teachers’ Subject Matter Knowledge
Author :
Abstract
Keywords
Abstract
This study aimed at investigation of the development of elementary science teachers' subject matter knowledge through some selected hands-on activities based on inquiry-based instruction. 58 voluntary elementary science teachers participated in the study with non-random convenience sampling. The elementary science teachers in the study carried out 15 inquiry-based hands-on physics activities. To assess Subject-Matter Knowledge (SMK), three instruments about some selected physics content (mechanics, optics, pressure, electricity, and heat) and science process skills were utilized as pretests and posttests: Traditional Problems Test (TPT), Context-Based Problems Test (CBPT), and Science Process Skills Test (SPST). Scores, particularly on the TPT and CBPT, indicated unsatisfactory levels of SMK in physics. Furthermore, performances were better on the TPT rather than the CBPT. In consequence, the inquiry-based hands-on physics activities were observed to help the elementary science teachers improve their SMK especially in terms of the CBPT scores. Finally, the SPST scores failed to reflect the progress in science process skills probably due to fatigue of testing. In sum, engagement in inquiry-based hands on physics activities seems to help the elementary science teachers develop especially their substantive knowledge.
Keywords
- Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1149). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
- Abraham, M. R. (1998). The learning cycle approach as a strategy for instruction in science. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 513-524). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Anderson, R. D. (2007). Inquiry as an organizing theme for science curricula. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 807-830). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
- Anderson, D., & Clark, M. (2012). Development of syntactic subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge for science by a generalist elementary teacher. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 18(3), 315-330.
- Aydin, S., & Boz, Y. (2012). Review of studies related to pedagogical content knowledge in the context of science teacher education: Turkish case. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(1), 497-505.
- Bianchini, J. A., & Colburn, A. (2000). Teaching the nature of science through inquiry to prospective elementary teachers: A tale of two researchers. Journal of research in science teaching, 37(2), 177-209.
- Blanchard, M. R., Southerland, S. A., Osborne, J. W., Sampson, V. D., Annetta, L. A., & Granger, E. M. (2010). Is inquiry possible in light of accountability?: A quantitative comparison of the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction. Science Education, 94(4), 577-616.
- Burns, J. C., Okey, J. C., & Wise, K. (1985). Development of an Integrated Process Skills Test: TIPS II. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(2), 169-177.
- Carlsen, W. S. (1991). Subject-matter knowledge and science teaching: A pragmatic perspective. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Vol. 2. Teachers’ knowledge of subject matter as it relates to their teaching practice (pp. 115-144). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
- Cochran, K. F., & Jones, L. L. (1998). The subject matter knowledge of preservice science teachers. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 707–718). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Cohen, J., Cohen, P., Stephen, G. W., & Leona, S. A. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Erkol, S., & Ugulu, I. (2014). Examining biology teachers candidates’ scientific process skill levels and comparing these levels in terms of various variables. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 47424747.
- Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (1996). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill.
- Gallagher, J. J. (2007). Teaching science for understanding: A practical guide for middle and high school teachers. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
- Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement methods vs traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74.
- Huber, R. A., & Moore, C. J. (2001). A model for extending hands-on science to be inquiry-based. School Science and Mathematics, 101(1), 32-42.
- Kubicek, J. P. (2005). Inquiry-based learning, the nature of science and computer technology: New possibilities in science education. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31. Retrieved July 3, 2008, from http://cjlt.csj.ualberta.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/149/142.2JosephR.V.FloraandAdrienneT.Cooper.In corporatingInquiryBasedLaboratoryExperimentinUndergraduateEnvironmentalEngineeringLaboratoryJ.JournalofProfess ionalIssuesinEngineeringEducationandPractice20051:19-25.3
- Lunetta, V. N., Hofstein, A., & Clough, M. (2007). Learning and teaching in the school science laboratory: An analysis of research, theory, and practice. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 393–441). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95 - 132). Boston: Kluwer.
- National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows. New York, NY: Open University Press.
- Schwab, J. J. (1964). The structure of the disciplines: Meaning and significance. In G. W. Ford & L. Pugno (Eds.), The structure of knowledge and the curriculum (pp. 31–49). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
- Scott, P., Asoko, H., & Leach, J. (2007). Student conceptions and conceptual learning in science. Handbook of research on science education, 31-56.
- Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using a multivariate statistic. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
- Treagust, D. (2007). General instructional methods and strategies. In Abell S. K., Lederman N. G. (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 373–392). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
- Trumper, R. (2003). The physics laboratory – A historical overview and future perspectives. Science & Education, 12, 645-670.
- Ünal, C. (2012). An investigation of undergraduate student’s scientific inquiry processes in a physics laboratory (Doctoral thesis, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
- Welch, W. W., Klopfer, L. E., & Aikenhead, G. E. (1981). The role of inquiry in science education: Analysis and recommendations, Science Education, 65, 33–50.
- Yip, D. Y., Chung, C. M., & Mak, S. Y. (1998). The subject matter knowledge in physics related topics of Hong Kong junior secondary science teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7(4), 319-328.
- Zhang, L. (2016). Is inquiry-based science teaching worth the effort? Some thoughts worth considering. Science & Education, 25, 897-915.
