The Investigation of the Relationship Between Attitudes Towards E-Learning and Self-Directed Learning with Technology of Secondary School Students

Author :  

Year-Number: 2018-Volume 10, Issue 5
Language : null
Konu :
Number of pages: 297-314
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationships between attitudes towards e-learning and self-directed learning with technology of secondary school students. This descriptive study is designed with correlational research methods. The sample of this study is consist of 313 students from 5 different secondary schools in Malatya in Turkey. Data is collected in 2015- 2016 academic year through self-directed learning with technology scale for young students and attitude scale towards e‐learning. Descriptive statictiscs, independent sample t-test, One way Anova and linear regression analysis is used for data analysis. According to the findings, levels of students’ self-directed learning with technology and attitude towards e‐learning is slightly higher. Students’ self-directed learning with technology and attitude towards e‐learning do not differ in terms of gender and purpose of using internet. But students’ self-directed learning with technology and attitude towards e‐learning differ in terms of students’ daily internet use time and frequency of computer/internet use during school lessons. Students’ self-directed learning with technology predict students’ attitude towards e‐learning significantly. %11 of the variance of students’ attitude towards e‐learning can be explained by students’ self-directed learning with technology. The results indicates that frequency of internet use or time both in school lessons and out of school are important factors for students’ self-directed learning with technology and attitude towards e‐learning. Also students’ self-directed learning with technology is one of important predictors of students’ attitude towards e‐learning.

Keywords


  • Abdullah, M. H. (2001). Self-directed learning. ERIC Digest. Retrieved https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ ED459458.pdf

  • Agyei, D. D., & Voogt, J. M. (2011). Exploring the potential of the will, skill, tool model in Ghana: Pre-dicting prospective and practicing teachers’ use of technology. Computers & Education, 56(2011), 91–100.

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological bulletin, 84(5), 888. Retrieved http://psycnet.apa.org/record/1978-20968-001

  • Almarabeh, T., Majdalawi, Y. K., & Mohammad, H. (2016). Internet usage, challenges, and attitudes among university students: case study of the university of Jordan. Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 9(12), 577-587.

  • Al-Musawi, N. M. M. (2014). Development and validation of a scale to measure student attitudes towards e- learning. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 210(1183), 1-12.

  • Bartholomew, S. (2016). A mixed-method study of mobile devices and student self-directed learning and achievement during a middle school STEM activity(Unpublished Phd Thesis), Utah State University, USA.

  • Beavers, A. (2009). Teachers as learners: Implications of adult education for professional development. Journal of college teaching and learning, 6(7), 25-30.

  • Bhuasiri, W., Xaymoungkhoun, O., Zo, H., Rho, J, J., & Ciganek, A, P. (2012). Critical success factors for e- learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty. Computers & Education, 58, 843-855.

  • Bolhuis, S. (2003). Towards process-oriented teaching for self-directed lifelong learning: a multidimensional perspective. Learning and instruction, 13(3), 327-347.

  • Brändström, C. (2011). Using the Internet in Education-Strengths and Weaknesses: A Qualitative Study of Teachers' Opinions on the Use of the Internet in Planning and Instruction. Retrieved http://www.divaportal.org/smash/get/diva2:438827/fulltext01.pdf

  • Brookfield, S. (1985). Self‐directed learning: A critical review of research. New Directions for adult and continuing education, 1985(25), 5-16.

  • Caffarella, R. S. (1993). Self‐directed learning. New directions for adult and continuing education, 1993(57), 25-35.

  • Caffarella, R. S. (2000). Goals of self-learning. Conceptions of self-directed learning: Theoretical and conceptual considerations, 37-48.

  • Can, A. (2013). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

  • Candy, P. C. (2004). Linking thinking: Self-directed learning in the digital age. Canberra,, Australia: Department of Education, Science and Training.

  • Chiu, C. M., & Wang, E. T. G. (2008). Understanding web-based learning continuance intention: The role of subjective task value. Information & Management, 45(3), 194-201.

  • Chu, R. J., & Chu, A. Z. (2010). Multi-level analysis of peer support, internet self-efficacy and e-learning outcomes – the contextual effects of collectivism and group potency. Computers & Education, 55(1), 145154.

  • Demir, Ö., & Yurdugül, H. (2013). Self-directed learning with technology scale for young students: A validation study. E-international Journal of Educational Research, 4(3), 58-73.

  • Demir, Ö., & Yurdugül, H. (2014). Ortaokul ve lise öğrencileri için bilgisayara yönelik tutum ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(176), 247-256.

  • Demir, Ö., Yaşar, S., Sert, G., & Yurdugül, H. (2014). Çocukların bilgisayara yönelik tutumları ile teknolojiyle kendi kendine öğrenmeleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(176), 257-266.

  • Ellinger, A. D. (2004). The concept of self-directed learning and its implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 6(2), 158-177.

  • Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (2015). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

  • Fuller, R. M., Vician, C., & Brown, S. A. (2006). E-learning and individual characteristics: the role of the computer anxiety and communication apprehension. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46(4), 103– 115.

  • Garrison, D. R. & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice. London: Routledge Falmer.

  • Gibbons, M. (2002). The self-directed learning handbook: Challenging adolescent students to excel. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Govindasamy, T. (2001). Successful implementation of e-learning: Pedagogical considerations. The internet and higher education, 4(3-4), 287-299.

  • Guglielmino, L. M. (2008). Why self-directed learning. International Journal of Self-directed learning, 5(1), 1-14.

  • Guglielmino, L. M. (2013). The case for promoting self-directed learning in formal educational institutions. SA-eDUC, 10(2).

  • Gunasekaran, A., McNeil, R. D., & Shaul, D. (2002). E-learning: research and applications. Industrial and commercial training, 34(2), 44-53.

  • Haznedar, Ö. & Baran, B. (2012). Eğitim fakültesi öğrencileri için e-öğrenmeye yönelik genel bir tutum ölçeği geliştirme çalışması. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 2(2), 42-59.

  • Al-Hunaiyyan, A., Al-Huwail, N. and Al-Sharhan, S. (2008) Blended e-learning design: Discussion of cultural ıssues. International Journal of Cyber Society and Education, 1, 17- 32.

  • Ingec, S. K. (2015). Investigation of students’ attitudes towards e-learning in terms of different variables – A case study in a technical and vocational high school for girls. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(1), 81–

  • Jaleel, S., & Anuroofa, O. M. (2017). A study on the relationship between self directed learning and achievement in ınformation technology of students at secondary level. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(10), 1849-1852.

  • Jarvis, P. (2004). Adult education and lifelong learning: Theory and practice. Routledge.

  • Kisanga, D. H., & Ireson, G. (2016). Test of e-Learning Related Attitudes (TeLRA) scale: Development, reliability and validity study. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 12(1), 20.

  • Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-Directed Learning. New York: Association Press.

  • Lee, K., Tsai, P. S., Chai, C. S., & Koh, J. H. L. (2014). Students' perceptions of self‐directed learning and collaborative learning with and without technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(5), 425-437.

  • Liaw, S. S., & Huang, H. M. (2011). A study of investigating learners attitudes toward e-learning. 5th International Conference on Distance Learning and Education IPCSIT vol.12 (2011), IACSIT Press, Singapore.

  • Liaw, S. S., Huang, H. M., & Chen, G. D. (2007). Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e- learning. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1066-1080.

  • Link, T. M., & Marz, R. (2006). Computer literacy and attitudes towards e-learning among first year medical students. BMC medical education, 6(1), 34. Retrieved https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/track /pdf/10.1186/1472-6920-6-34

  • Merriam, S. B., & Caffarella, R. S. (1999). Learning in adulthood. San Francisco: JosseyBass.

  • Mezirow, J. (1985). A critical theory of self-directed learning. İçinde S. Brookfield (Ed.), Self-directed learning: From theory to practice (pp. 17-30). New Directions for Continuing Education, No. 25. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). e-learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same?. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129-135.

  • Oddi, L. F. (1987). Perspectives on self-directed learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 38(1), 21-31.

  • Ong, C. H. & Lai, J. Y. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e- learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(5), 816-829.

  • Owen, T. R. (2002). Self-Directed Learning in Adulthood: A Literature Review.

  • Papaioannou, P., & Charalambous, K. (2011). Principals’ attitudes towards ICT and their perceptions about the factors that facilitate or inhibit ICT integration in primary schools of Cyprus. Journal of Informa-tion Technology Education, 10, 349-369.

  • Paris, P. G. (2004). E-Learning: A study on secondary students' attitudes towards online web assisted learning. International Education Journal, 5(1), 98-112.

  • Pituch, K. A., & Lee, Y. K. (2006). The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Computers & Education, 47(2), 222–244.

  • Rashid, T., & Asghar, H. M. (2016). Technology use, self-directed learning, student engagement and academic performance: Examining the interrelations. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 604-612.

  • Rees, M., & Bary, R. (2006). Is self-directed learning the key skill for tomorrow’s engineers? European Journal of Engineering Education, 31(1), 73-81.

  • Rhema, A., & Miliszewska, I. (2014). Analysis of student attitudes towards e-learning: The case of engineering students in Libya. Issues in informing science and information Technology, 11, 169-190.

  • Rosenberg, M. J. (2000). E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Shih, P., Muñoz, D., & Sanchez, F. (2006). The effect of previous experience with information and com- munication technologies on performance in a web-based learning program. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(6), 962–970.

  • Smedley, A., (2007). The self-directed learning readiness of first year bachelor of nursing students. Journal of Research in Nursing 12 (4), 373–385.

  • Song, L., & Hill, J. R. (2007). A conceptual model for understanding self-directed learning in online environments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(1), 27–41.

  • Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & education, 50(4), 1183-1202.

  • Suri, G., & Sharma, S. (2013). The impact of gender on attitude towards computer technology and e-learning: An exploratory study of Punjab University, India. International Journal of Engineering Research, 2(2), 132

  • Tavangarian, D., Leypold, M. E., Nölting, K., Röser, M., & Voigt, D. (2004). Is e-learning the solution for ındividual learning?. Electronic Journal of E-learning, 2(2), 273-280.

  • Timothy, T., Chee, T. S., Beng, L. C., Sing, C. C., Ling, K. J. H., Li, C. W., & Mun, C. H. (2010). The self-directed learning with technology scale (SDLTS) for young students: An initial development and validation. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1764-1771.

  • Ülgen, G. (1994). Eğitim psikolojisi: Kavramlar, ilkeler, yöntemler, kuramlar ve uygulamalar. Ankara: BilimYayınları.

  • Vonderwell, S., & Turner, S. (2005). Active learning and preservice teachers’ experience in an online course: a case study. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(1), 65–84.

  • Welsh, E. T., Wanberg, C. R., Brown, K. G., & Simmering, M. J. (2003). E‐learning: emerging uses, empirical results and future directions. international Journal of Training and Development, 7(4), 245-258.

  • Zhang, D., Zhao, J. L., Zhou, L., & Nunamaker Jr, J. F. (2004). Can e-learning replace classroom learning?. Communications of the ACM, 47(5), 75-79.

  • Zhang, P., & Bhattacharyya, S. (2008). Students’ views of a learning management system: A longitudinal qualitative study. The Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 23(2008), 351-374.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics