Pathways To Well-being İn Adolescence: The Role Of Parent Attachment And Competence*

Author :  

Year-Number: 2010-Volume 2, Issue 3
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

Self–determination theory indicates that humans have three basic psychological needs (autonomy, competence and relatedness), and the satisfaction of the needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness are essential because it contributes independently to healthy psychological growth and well–being. Although this prediction has been supported in studies with a number of studies in Western culture, no study has examined the contribution of each need to adolescents’ development Turkish culture. This study examined competence as a mediator between parent attachment (mother and father) and psychological well-being and adjustment of adolescents. A total of 282 high school students from the city of Ankara completed the self-report measures of parent attachment, competence, positive and negative affect, and adjustment. Using structural equation modeling, a model was examined in which competence mediated the link between parental attachment and well-being and adjustment of adolescents. Results from structural equation modeling analyses indicated that competence fully mediated the relationship between attachment to mother and well-being and partially mediated the relationship between attachment to mother and adjustment. On the contrary, attachment to father associated directly with adjustment. These findings suggested that parent attachment foster adolescent well-being and adjustment by promoting high level of competence.

Keywords

Abstract

Self–determination theory indicates that humans have three basic psychological needs (autonomy, competence and relatedness), and the satisfaction of the needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness are essential because it contributes independently to healthy psychological growth and well–being. Although this prediction has been supported in studies with a number of studies in Western culture, no study has examined the contribution of each need to adolescents’ development Turkish culture. This study examined competence as a mediator between parent attachment (mother and father) and psychological well-being and adjustment of adolescents. A total of 282 high school students from the city of Ankara completed the self-report measures of parent attachment, competence, positive and negative affect, and adjustment. Using structural equation modeling, a model was examined in which competence mediated the link between parental attachment and well-being and adjustment of adolescents. Results from structural equation modeling analyses indicated that competence fully mediated the relationship between attachment to mother and well-being and partially mediated the relationship between attachment to mother and adjustment. On the contrary, attachment to father associated directly with adjustment. These findings suggested that parent attachment foster adolescent well-being and adjustment by promoting high level of competence.

Keywords


  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin,103, 411–423.

  • Armsden, G.C., & Greenberg, M.T. (1987). The inventory of parent and peer attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16, 427–454.

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.

  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 22-147.

  • Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment. Vol. 1 of Attachment and Loss. New York: Basic Books.

  • Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. New York: Basic Book.

  • Buist, K. L., Dekovic, M., Meeus, V. H., ve van Aken, M. A. G. (2004). Attachment in adolescence: A social relations model analysis. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19(6),

  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Principles of self-regulation: Action and emotion. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp.3–52). New York: Guilford Press.

  • Crittenden, P.M. (1992). Treatment of anxious attachment in infancy and early childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 4, 575–602.

  • Cotterell, J. L. (1992). The relation of attachments and supports to adolescent well-being and school adjustment. Journal of Adolescent Research, 7, 28.42.

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.

  • Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575.

  • Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2002). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 63-73). New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Doyle, A.B., & Markiewicz, D. (2005) Parenting, marital conflict and adjustment from early- to mid-adolescence: Mediated by adolescent attachment style? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 97-110.

  • Elicker, J., Englund,M., & Sroufe, L. A. (1992). Predicting peer competence and peer relation-ships in childhood formerly parent-child relationships. In R.D. Parke & G.W. Ladd (Eds.), Family-peer relationships: Modes of linkage (pp. 77-106). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Gagné, M. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosaically behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 199-223.

  • Gençöz, T. (2000). Pozitif ve negatif duygu ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması, Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 15(46), 19-26.

  • Gorssman, K. E., & Grossman, K (1991). Attchmant quality as an organizer of emotional and behavioral responses in a longitudinal perspective. In C. M. Parkes, J. StevensonHinde, & P. Marris (Eds.), Attachment across the life-cycle. Tavistock, Uk: Routledge.

  • Gorssman, K. E., Grossman, K. & Zimmerman, P. (1999). A wider view of attachment and exploration: Stability and change during the years of immaturity. In J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment; Theory research and, clinical applications. New York: Guilford.

  • Harter, S. (1981). A model of mastery motivation in children: Individual differences and developmental change. In W. A. Collins (Ed.), Minnesota symposium on child psychology, Vol:14. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Harter, S., & Connell, J. P. (1984). A model of children’s achievement and related self- perception of competence, control, and motivational orientation. In J. Nicholls & M. Maehr (Eds.). Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 3). The development of achievement motivation. London: JAI Press.

  • Hu, L. T. & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes incovariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8. User’s reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software.

  • Kishton, J. M., & Widaman, K. F. (1994). Unidimensional versus domain representative parceling of questionnaire items: An empirical example. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 757–765.

  • Kobak, R. (1999). The emotional dynamics of disruptions in attachment relationship: Implications for theory, research, and clinical intervention. In J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment; Theory research and, clinical applications. New York: Guilford.

  • La Guardia, J. G., Ryan, R. M., Couchman, C. E., ve Deci, E. L. (2000). Within-person variation in security of attachment: a self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Behavior, 79(3), 367-384.

  • MacCallum, R. C., & Austin, J. T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201-226.

  • Main, M. (1983). Exploration, play, and cognitive functioning related to infant-mother attachment. Infant Behavior and Development, 6, 167-174.

  • Main, M., Kaplan, N., & Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. In I. Bretherton & E.Waters (Eds.), Growing points in attachment theory and research. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50, (1–2, serial no. 209), 66–106.

  • Paterson, J. E., Field, J. & Pryor, J. (1994). Adolescents’ perception of their attachment relationship with their mother, father and friends. Journal Youth and Adolescence, 23(5), 579-600.

  • Raja, S. N., McGee, R. & Stanton, W. R. (1992). Perceived attachments to parents and peers and psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 471

  • Reynolds, W. M. (2001). Reynolds Adolescents’ Adjustment Screening Inventory (RAASI): Professional Manual, Lutz, FL. Psychological Assessment Resources.

  • Rice, K. (1990). Attachment in adolescence: A narrative and meta-analytic review. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 19, 511–538.

  • Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self–determination theory and the facilitation of instrinsicmotivation, social development, and well–being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.

  • Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507-514.

  • Shaver, P. R., & Hazan, C. (1993). Adult romantic attachment: Theory and evidence. In D. Perlman &W. Jones (Eds.). Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 4, pp. 29–70). London: Jessica Kingsley.

  • Sheldon,K.M., Ryan, R., & Reis, H.T. (1996). What makes for a good day? Competence and autonomy in the day and in the person. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22,

  • Simons, K. J. M., Paternite, C., & Shore, C. (2001). Quality of parent/adolescent attachment and aggression in young adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 21, 182–203.

  • Srouf, A., Egeland, B., & Kreutzer, T. (1990). The fate of early experience following development change: Longitudinal approaches to individual adaptation in childhood. Child Development, 61, 1363-1373.

  • Trinke, S. J., & Bartholomew, K. (1997). Hierarchies of attachment relationships in young adulthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14(5), 603-625.

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.

  • Weinfield, N., Sroufe, A., Egeland, B. & Carlson, E. (1999). The nature of individual differences in infancaregiver attachment. In J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment; Theory research and, clinical applications. New York: Guilford.

  • Véronneau, M-H, Koestner, R. F, & Abela, J. R.Z. (2005). Intrinsic need satisfaction and well–being in children and adolescents: an application of the Self–determination theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24(2), 280-292.

  • Wei, M., Shaffer, P., A., Young, S., K, & Zakalik R., A. (2005). Adult attachment, shame, depression, and loneliness: The mediation role of basic psychological needs satisfaction Journal of Counseling Psychology 52(4), 591–601.

  • Wilkinson, R. B. (2004). The role of parental and peer attachment in the psychological health and self-esteem of adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33(6), 479–493.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics