Quality Of Education İn Rural Schools: A Needs Assessment Study (ankara-kalecik Sample)

Author :  

Year-Number: 2011-Volume 3, Issue 1
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

This study aims to examine the quality of education provided by elementary schools in Kalecik, a rural district of Ankara, from the perspectives of administrators, teachers, and students. The participants of the study were 3 administrators, 33 teachers, and 212 students from 6th, 7th, and 8th grades chosen from 3- elementary school. Data related to school facilities, students’ educational expectations, teacher characteristics, school climate and education quality, parent involvement, curriculum implementation and availability of technology, and instructional materials collected by using questionnaires. Results indicated that both teachers and students are satisfied with the school’s physical conditions. Conversely, the number of teachers teaching outside their areas of license is quite high. Besides, lack of technology and lack of parental involvement found to be factors that might have an effect on the quality of education. Moreover, teachers tend to encourage competition rather than cooperation among students.

Keywords

Abstract

This study aims to examine the quality of education provided by elementary schools in Kalecik, a rural district of Ankara, from the perspectives of administrators, teachers, and students. The participants of the study were 3 administrators, 33 teachers, and 212 students from 6th, 7th, and 8th grades chosen from 3- elementary school. Data related to school facilities, students’ educational expectations, teacher characteristics, school climate and education quality, parent involvement, curriculum implementation and availability of technology, and instructional materials collected by using questionnaires. Results indicated that both teachers and students are satisfied with the school’s physical conditions. Conversely, the number of teachers teaching outside their areas of license is quite high. Besides, lack of technology and lack of parental involvement found to be factors that might have an effect on the quality of education. Moreover, teachers tend to encourage competition rather than cooperation among students.

Keywords


  • Adaman, F. & Keyder, Ç. (2006). Türkiye’de büyükşehirlerin varoşlarında yoksulluk ve sosyal dışlanma. *Poverty and social exclusion in the suburbs of big cities in Turkey+. European Commission, the Local Community Action Program in Combating Social Exclusion 2002-2006. Retrieved on 8 April, 2009, at URL: http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/social_inclusion/docs/2006/study_turkey_tr.pdf

  • Atkins, D. H. (1999). Brain and developmental research: implications for child development and early education. In J. Bennett (Eds.), The Relationship Between Classroom Climate and Student Achievement. Denton, Texas. UNT Digital Library. Retrieved on 29 May, 2009, at URL: http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc3065/m1/1/

  • Baker, D. P. & Stevenson, D. L. (1986). Mothers’ strategies for children's achievement: managing the transition to high school. Sociology of Education, 59, 156-166.

  • Baker, E. L., Gearhart, M., & Herman, J. L. (1994). Evaluating the apple classrooms of tomorrow. In E. L. Baker H. F. O'Neil, Jr. (Eds.), Technology Assessment in Education and Training (pp. 173-197). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Ballou, D. (1996). Do public schools hire the best applicants? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, (1), 97-133.

  • Bascia, N. & Fredua-Kwarteng, E. (2008). Class size reduction: what the literature suggests about what works. Toronto: Canadian Education Association. 1-32.

  • Becker, H. J. & Epstein, J. L. (1982). Parent involvement: a survey of teacher practices. Elementary School Journal, (83), 85-102.

  • Bennett, J. (2001). The relationship between classroom climate and student achievement. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of North Texas.

  • Bulach, C.R., Malone, B. (1994). The relationship of School Climate to the Implementation of School Reform. ERS Spectrum, 12 (4), 3-8.

  • Cohen, J. (2006). Social, emotional, ethical and academic education: Creating a climate for learning, participation in democracy and well-being. Harvard Educational Review, 76 (2), 201-237.

  • Coleman, J. S. (1987). Families and schools. educational researcher. Washington, DC, 16 (6), 32-38.

  • Corner, J. P. (1986). Parent participation in the schools. Phi Delta Kappa, 67, 442-444.

  • Creemers, B. P. M. & Reezigt, G. J. (1999). The role of school and classroom climate in elementary school learning environments. In Freiberg, H. J. (Ed.). School climate: Measuring, improving and sustaining healthy learning environments. Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press.

  • Darling–Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: a review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8 (1).

  • Deutsch, F.M. (2003). How small classes benefit high school students. NASSP Bulletin, 87, (635), 35-44.

  • Dornbusch, S. M., & Ritter, P. L. (1988). Parents of high school students: a neglected resource. Educational Horizons, 66, 75-77.

  • Easton, S. E., & Ellerbruch, L.W. (1985). Update on the citizenship and social studies achievement of rural 13-year-olds. Bozeman: Montana State University, 262 -946.

  • Ehrenberg, R.G., and Brewer, D. (1994). Do school and teacher characteristics matter? Evidence from high school and beyond. Economics of Education Review, 13, (1), 1-17.

  • Ehrenberg, R.G., and Brewer, D. J. (1995). Did teachers’ verbal ability and race matter in the 1960s. Coleman Revisited. Economics of Education Review, 14, (1), 1–21.

  • Epstein, J. L. (1986). Parents’ reactions to teacher practices of parent involvement. Elementary School Journal, 86, 277–294.

  • European Report of May 2000 on the quality of school education: sixteen quality indicators. http://ec.europa.eu/education/policies/educ/indic/rapinen.pdf Accessed on April 12, 2009.

  • Ferguson, R.F. (1991). Paying for Public Education: New Evidence on How and Why Money Matters. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 28 (2), 465–499.

  • Finn, J. D., Pannozzo, G. M., & Achilles C. M. (2003). The "Why’s" of Class Size: Student Behavior in Small Classes. Review of Educational Research, 73, (3), 321-368.

  • Flaxman, E., & Inger, M. (1991). Parents and Schooling in the 1990's. ERIC Review, 1, 2-6.

  • Fuller, B. (1986). Raising school quality in developing countries: what investments boost learning? World Bank Discussion Papers 2. Washington, DC.

  • Fuller, B., & Clarke, P. (1994). Raising school effects while ignoring culture? Local conditions and the influence of classroom tools, rules and pedagogy. Review of Educational Research, 64, 119-157.

  • Gedikoğlu, T. (2005). Avrupa Birliği sürecinde Türk eğitim sistemi: sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 1 (1), 66-80. Gold, Y. (1996). Beginning teacher support. Attrition, mentoring, and induction. In J. Sikula (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.

  • Haynes, N. M., Corner, J. P. & Hamilton-Lee, M. (1989). School climate enhancement through parental involvement. Journal of School Psychology, 27, 87–90.

  • Heck, R. H. (2000). Examining the impact of school quality on school outcomes and improvement: a value added approach. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36, (4), 513-552.

  • Henderson, A. (1994). A new generation of evidence: the family is crucial to student achievement. National Committee for Citizens in Education, Washington, DC.

  • Huling-Austin, L. (1990). Teacher induction programs and internships. In W.R. Houston (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education. New York: Macmillan.

  • Jonassen, D. H. (2004). Handbook of research for educational communications and technology. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Keating, J. E. (2000). Keep the Teaching on Track: Learn to Tackle Behaviour Problems Quickly. Education Week Magazine, Idaho.

  • Luyten, H., Visscher, A. & Witziers, B. (2005). School effectiveness research: from a review of the criticism to recommendations for further development. School effectiveness and School Improvement, 16, (3), 249– 279.

  • Lynn, S. K. (2002). The Winding Path: Understanding the Career Cycle of Teachers. The Clearing House. 75 (4), 179-182.

  • Mayer, D.P., Mullens, J. E. & Moore, M. T. (2000). Monitoring school quality: an indicators report. mathematical policy research, Inc. U.S. Department of Education.

  • McManus, S. M., & Gettinger, M. (1996). Teacher and student evaluations of cooperative learning and observed interactive behaviors. The Journal of Educational Research, 90,

  • MONE (1993). İlkokuma yazma öğretimi kılavuzu. Guide of teaching reading and writing. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı İlköğretim Genel Müdürlüğü. Ankara. MEB.

  • Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: what every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.

  • Philips, R. (1997). Educational facility age and the academic achievement of upper elementary school students. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Georgia.

  • Powell, J. C. & Anderson, R. D. (2002). Changing teachers' practice: curriculum material and science education reform in the USA.

  • Scheerens, J. (1997). Conceptual models and theory-embedded principles on effective schooling. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 8, 269 – 310.

  • Scheerens, J. (2001). Monitoring school effectiveness in developing countries. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12, (4), 359-384.

  • Sezgin, İ. S. (2002). Öğretmen eğitiminde gelişmeler ve sorunlar. Developments and problems in teacher training. Çağdaş Eğitim, 293, 6-8.

  • Sivin-Kachala, J. (1998). Report on the effectiveness of technology in schools, 1990-1997. Washington, DC: Software Publishers Association.

  • Taneri, P. O. (2004). A Study On Novice Classroom Teachers’ Problems With Regular And Alternative Certificates. Middle East Technical University. Unpublished Master Dissertation Department of Educational Sciences, Curriculum and Instruction Program. Ankara.

  • Tezcan, M. (1982). Eğitim sosyolojisi. Educational sociology. Ankara. Adım Matbaacılık.

  • Tuckman B. W. (1999). Conducting educational research. 5

  • UNICEF (2000). Defining quality in education. Working Paper Series-Education Section. New York.

  • UNICEF (2004). No stopping us now, we are at school. Say Yes, the Quarterly Newsletter of UNICEF Turkey. Retrieved on 1-February-2009, at URL: www.unicef.org/turkey/pdf/_sy12.pdf

  • UNESCO (2004). Educating rural people: a low priority. Education Today, 9. The Newsletter of UNESCO’s Education Sector.

  • Vrasidas, C., & McIsaac, M. S. (2001). Integrating technology in teaching and teacher education: Implications for policy and curriculum reform. Educational Media International, 38 (2/3), 127-132.

  • Wiesman, L. D., Coover, D. D., & Knight, L.S. (1999). Becoming a Teacher in a Field- Based Setting: An Introduction to Education and Classrooms. USA, Wadsworth Publishing Company.

  • World Bank (2005). Turkey – Education sector study: sustainable pathway to an effective, equitable, and efficient education system for preschool through secondary school education. Volume 1, Report no. 32450-TU.

  • Yıldız, G. & Ardıç, K. (1999). Eğitimde toplam kalite yönetimi. Total quality management in education. Bilgi, 1: 73-82.

  • Young, D. J. & Fisher, D. L. (1996). School effectiveness research in rural schools. Proceedings Western Australian Institute for Educational Research Forum 1996. Retrieved on 9-August-2009, at URL: http://www.waier.org.au/forums/1996/young.html.

  • Young, D. J. (1998). Rural and urban differences in student achievement in science and mathematics: a multilevel analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9, (4),

  • Zahorik, J. A. (1999). Reducing class size leads to individualized instruction. Educational Leadership, 57, (1), 50-53.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics