First Year Students' Engagement At The University

Author :  

Year-Number: 2011-Volume 3, Issue 1
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to seek first year students’ engagement at the universities. The methodology of this research was survey and correlation. The First Year Experience Questionnaire (FYEQ) of Krause & Coates (2008) employed to gather data. Of the 1921 first year students (girls 1136 and boys 785) 551 samples (girls 313 and boys 238) were produced to questionnaire by the targeted first year students at the University of Sistan and Baluchestan in Iran. SPSS 15 was used to produce Mean; Standard Deviations; Pearson Product Moment Correlation (r); T-test; and ANOVA. The results showed that the first year students relatively scored over average their engagements in five components, and they marked relatively high scores on intellectual engagement and class engagement. The rank order showed that intellectual engagement and class engagement have had outrank in comparison with other components. There was relatively high positive correlation between components of engagement. The highest correlation is related to the online engagement scale with the intellectual engagement, the transition engagement with the student-staff engagement, peer engagement scale with the academic engagement, and the beyond-class engagement scale with the online engagement.

Keywords

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to seek first year students’ engagement at the universities. The methodology of this research was survey and correlation. The First Year Experience Questionnaire (FYEQ) of Krause & Coates (2008) employed to gather data. Of the 1921 first year students (girls 1136 and boys 785) 551 samples (girls 313 and boys 238) were produced to questionnaire by the targeted first year students at the University of Sistan and Baluchestan in Iran. SPSS 15 was used to produce Mean; Standard Deviations; Pearson Product Moment Correlation (r); T-test; and ANOVA. The results showed that the first year students relatively scored over average their engagements in five components, and they marked relatively high scores on intellectual engagement and class engagement. The rank order showed that intellectual engagement and class engagement have had outrank in comparison with other components. There was relatively high positive correlation between components of engagement. The highest correlation is related to the online engagement scale with the intellectual engagement, the transition engagement with the student-staff engagement, peer engagement scale with the academic engagement, and the beyond-class engagement scale with the online engagement.

Keywords


  • Allen, T. D., MacManus, S. E. and Russell, J. E. A. (1999) Newcomer socialization and stress: relationships as a source of support, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54(3), 453 – 470

  • Astin, AW. (1999) student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education, Journal of College Student Development, September/October 1999 (originally published 1984), 40(5) 518-529, http://www.middlesex.mass.edu/TutoringServices/AstinInvolvement.pdf

  • Astin, A. (1997). The changing American college student: Thirty year trends: 1966–1996. The Review of Higher Education, 21(2), 115–135

  • Astin, A. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

  • Barnett, R., & Coate, K. (2005). Engaging the curriculum in higher education. Maidenhead, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

  • Coates, H. (2007). A model of online and general campus-based student engagement. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 121–141

  • Coates, H. (2006) Student Engagement In Campus-Based And Online Education: University Connections Abingdon: Routledge,

  • Christie, H., Tett, L., Cree, V. E., Hounsell, J. and McCune, V. (2008) A real rollercoaster of confidence and emotions: learning to be a university student, Studies in Higher Education, 33(5), 567-581

  • Eggens, L., Werf, M. P. C. and Bosker, R. J., (2008) The influence of personal networks and social support on study attainment of students in university education, Higher Education, 55(5), 553-573

  • Gavala, J., & Flett, R. (2005). Influential factors moderating academic enjoyment /motivation and psychological well-being for Māori university students at Massey University. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 34(1), 52–57

  • Gilbert, J., Morton, S., & Rowley, J. (2007). e-Learning: The student experience. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 560–573

  • Ipsos MORI. (2007). Student expectations study: Key findings from online research and discussion evenings held in June 2007 for the Joint Information Systems Committee (Briefing paper). Bristol: Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC).

  • Ipsos MORI. (2008). Great expectations of ICT: How higher education institutions are measuring up. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/publications/greatexpectations.aspx

  • Hardy, C and Bryson, C. (2009). Settled in well socially but just getting by academically: Social and academic transitions to university at the end of the first year, European First Year Conference: Enhancing the first-year experience, Theory, research and practice. University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands, 13–15 May.

  • Hillman, K. (2005). The first year experience: the transition from secondary school to university and TAFE in Australia. http://www.griffith.edu.au/data/assets/pdf_file/0006/37491/FYEReport05.pdf

  • Hockings, C., Cooke, S. and Bowl, M. (2007) Academic Engagement within a widening participation context – a 3D analysis, Teaching in Higher Education, 12(5-6), 721-733.

  • Horstmanshof, L., & Zimitat, C. (2007). Future time orientation predicts academic engagement among first year university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 77(3), 703–718.

  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Johnson, D., Soldner, M., Leonard, J., Alvarez, P., Inkelas, K., Rowan-Kenyon, H., & et al. (2007). Examining sense of belonging among first-year undergraduates from different racial/ethnic groups. Journal of College Student Development, 48(5), 525–542

  • Kearsley, G. and Shneiderman, B. (1998). Engagement Theory: A Framework for Technology- Based Teaching and Learning. Educational Technology. 38(5), 20-23

  • Kember, D., Lee, K., & Li, N. (2001) Cultivating a sense of belonging in part-time students International Journal of Lifelong Learning 20(4) 326–341 http://taylorandfrancis.metapress.com/index/PW0T4412UYK94WC7.pdf

  • Kennedy, G. E., Judd, T. S., Churchward, A., Gray, K. & Krause, K. (2008). First year students' experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 108–122

  • Krause, K. (2007b). Beyond classroom walls: Students’ out-of-class activities and implications for teaching and learning. Nagoya Journal of Higher Education 7(3), 301–318.

  • Krause, K. (2006). Student Voices In Borderless Higher Education: The Australian Experience. London: Observatory on Borderless Higher Education.

  • Krause, K. (2006). Transition To And Through The First Year: Strategies To Enhance The Student Experience. Keynote paper at The University of the Sunshine Coast Inaugural ViceChancellor’s Learning and Teaching Colloquium, May.

  • Krause, K. (2005). The changing face of the first year: Challenges for policy and practice in research- led universities. Keynote paper at The University of Queensland First Year Experience Workshop, October.

  • Krause, K., & Coates, H. (2008). Students’ engagement in first-year University. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 493-505

  • Krause, K-L., Hartley, R., James, R., & McInnis, C. (2005). The first year experience in Australian universities: Findings from a decade of national studies. http://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/37491/FYEReport05.pdf

  • Kuh, G. (2003). What we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE. Change, 35 (2), 24–32

  • Kuh, G. (2001). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties. Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning. http://nsse.iub.edu/pdf/conceptual_framework_2003.pdf

  • Kuh, GD. (2006) Making Students Matter in J.C. Burke (Ed.), Fixing the fragmented university: Decentralization with Direction. pp. 235-264 Bolton, MA: Jossey-Bass. http://cpr.iub.edu/uploads/Kuh%20Chapter%2010%20for%20Burke%202006.pdf

  • Kuh, G., Cruce, T., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. (2007). Unmasking the Effects of Student Engagement on College Grades and Persistence. Paper presented at the AERA Conference, Chicago.

  • Kuh, G., Cruce, T., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J. and Gonyea, R. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first year college grades and persistence, Journal of Higher Education, 79 (5), 540–563.

  • Kuh, G., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J., Bridges, B., & Hayek, J. (2006). What matters to student success: A review of the literature, http://nces.ed.gov/IPEDS/research/pdf/Kuh_Team_ Report.pdf

  • Kuh, G., R. Gonyea, and J. Williams. (2005). What students expect from college and what they get. In Promoting reasonable expectations, eds T. Miller, B. Bender, J. Schuh and associates. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching. 2nd ed. London: Rutledge Falmer.

  • Lave, J., and E. Wenger. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Law, B. (2005). Experiential learning in the context of educating for a sustainable future: Is it an appropriate pedagogy for shifting teachers’ thinking and engaging learners? Set: Research Information for Teachers, 3(1), 15–20

  • Lowe, H. and Cook, A. (2003) Mind the gap: are students prepared for Higher Education? Journal of Further and Higher Education, 27(1), 53-76

  • Mann, S. (2001) Alternative Perspectives on the Student Experience: alienation and engagement, Studies in Higher Education, 26(1), 7-19.

  • McInnis, C. (2003). New realities of the student experience: How should universities respond? Keynote address presented at the 25th annual European Association for Institutional Research Forum, Limerick, Ireland.

  • McInnis, C., P. Griffin, R. James, and H. Coates. (2001). Development of the Course Experience Questionnaire. Canberra: DEST.

  • McInnis, C., Hartley, R., Polesel, J., & Teese, R. (2000). Non-Completion in Vocational Education and Training and Higher Education. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs.

  • McMahon, B., & Portelli, J. (2004). Engagement for what? Beyond popular discourses of student engagement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(1), 59–76

  • Miliszewska, I., & Horwood, J. (2004). Engagement theory: A framework for supporting cultural differences in transnational education. Proceedings of the HERDSA Conference, Miri, Malaysia, July.

  • Owen, S., & Moyle, K. (2008). Students' voices: Learning with technologies: Australian Information and Communications Technology in Education Committee (AICTEC).

  • Palmer, M., O’Kane, P. and Owens, M. (2009) Betwixt spaces: student accounts of turning point experiences in the first-year transition, Studies in Higher Education, 34(1), 37-54

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research, 2. Jossey-Bass, An Imprint of Wiley, 848

  • Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (2004). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

  • Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

  • Peat, M., Dalziel, J. and Grant, A.M. (2001) Enhancing the first year student experience by facilitating the development of peer networks through a one-day workshop, Higher Education Research and Development, 20(2), 199-215.

  • Porter, S. (2006). Institutional structures and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 47(5), 531–558.

  • Pritchard, M.E., Wilson, G.S., Yamnitz, B. (2008). What predicts adjustment among college students? A longitudinal panel study. Journal of American College Health, 56 (1), 703-712.

  • Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Rutledge Falmer.

  • Sharpe, R., & Benfield, G. (2005). The student experience of e-learning in higher education: A review of the literature. Brookes e-Journal of Learning and Teaching, 1(3).

  • Schuetz, P. (2008). A theory-driven model of community college student engagement. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 32, 305–324.

  • Stavrianopoulos, K. (2008). Service Learning within the freshman year experience. College Student Journal, 42(2), 703-712.

  • Tinto, V. (2002). Establishing Conditions for Student Success. Paper presented at the 11th Annual Conference of the European Access Network, Monash University, Prato, Italy, June. http://www.wmin.ac.uk/can/wpm$5de1.pdf

  • Tinto, V. (1993) Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Umbach, P. D., & Wawrzynski, M. R. (2005). Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 153–184

  • Vest, C. M. (2005). Pursuing the endless frontier: Essays on MIT and the role of research universities. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

  • Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of Practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge:

  • Wilcox, P., Winn, S., & Fyvie-Gauld, M. (2005). It was nothing to do with the university, it was just the people: The role of social support in the first-year experience of higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 30(6), 707 – 722

  • Yorke, M. (2008). Delights and disappointments: Surveys of students' experience as indicators of expectations, Annual Staff Conference, University of Ulster. Londonderry, Northern Ireland: University of Ulster.

  • Yorke, M. (2006). Student engagement: Deep, surface or strategic? Keynote address delivered at the Pacific Rim First Year in Higher Education Conference, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Australia.

  • Yorke, M. (1999). Leaving early: Undergraduate non-completion in higher education. London: Falmer Press.

  • Yorke, M., & Longden, B. (2008). The first-year experience of higher education in the UK: Final report. York: The Higher Education Academy.

  • Yorke, M., & Thomas, L. (2003). Improving the retention of students from lower socio- economic groups. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 25(1), 63 – 74

  • Zhao, C., and G.D. Kuh. (2004). Adding value: learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education 45(2), 115–38

  • Zepke, N., Leach, L., & Prebble, T. (2006). Being learner centered: One way to improve student retention? Studies in Higher Education, 31(5), 587 – 600

  • Zepke, N. & Leach, L. (2005). Integration and adaptation: Approaches to the student retention and achievement puzzle. Active Learning in Higher Education, 6(1), 46–59

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics