Investigating Assessment Practices of In-service Teachers

Author :  

Year-Number: 2012-Volume 4, Issue 1
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to investigate the assessment practices of in-service teachers and to compare the assessment practices of teachers in different subject areas, teaching levels and teaching experience. Altogether 406 in-service teachers responded to the Teacher Assessment Practice Inventory. Rasch's model was used to analyse the characteristics of the assessment practices adopted by the teachers. Differential item functioning was performed to compare the assessment practices. In-service teachers were found to often use traditional types of assessment. The assessment practices differed between language teachers and science and mathematics teachers, primary school teachers and secondary school teachers and experienced teachers with inexperienced teachers.

Keywords

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to investigate the assessment practices of in-service teachers and to compare the assessment practices of teachers in different subject areas, teaching levels and teaching experience. Altogether 406 in-service teachers responded to the Teacher Assessment Practice Inventory. Rasch's model was used to analyse the characteristics of the assessment practices adopted by the teachers. Differential item functioning was performed to compare the assessment practices. In-service teachers were found to often use traditional types of assessment. The assessment practices differed between language teachers and science and mathematics teachers, primary school teachers and secondary school teachers and experienced teachers with inexperienced teachers.

Keywords


  • Abu Bakar Nordin (1986). Asas penilaian pendidikan. Petaling Jaya: Longman Malaysia Sdn Bhd.

  • Airasian, P. W. (2001). Classroom assessment: Concepts and applications (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

  • American Federation Of Teachers, National Council On Measurement In Education, & National Education Association (1990). Standards for teacher competence in educational assessment of students. Educational Measurement: Issues & Practice, 9(4), 30-32.

  • Author et al (2010) [details removed for peer review]

  • Baker, F. B., & Kim, S.-H. (2004). Item response theory: Parameter estimation techniques (2nd ed.). New York: Marcel Deeker, Inc.

  • Bejar, I. I. (1983). Introduction to item response models and their assumptions. In R. K. Hambleton (Ed.), Applications of item response theory (pp. 1-23). Vancouver: Educational Research Institute of British Columbia.

  • Bol, L., Stephenson, P. L., & O'Connell, A. A. (1998). Influence of experience, grade level and subject area on teachers' assessment practices. Journal of Educational Research, 91(6), 323-330.

  • Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2001). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associations

  • Brookhart, S. M. (1999). The art and science of classroom assessment: The missing part of pedagogy: Washington DC ERIC Clearinghouse On Higher Education And Office Educational Research And Improvement.

  • Chang, S. F. (1988). Teachers' assessment practices: Assessing phase II pupils' progress in KBSR English. Unpublished master's thesis, Universiti Malaya, Petaling Jaya.

  • Desforges, C. (1989). Testing and assessment. London: Cassell Education Limited.

  • Dorans, N. J., & Holland, P. W. (1993). DIF detection and description: Mental-Haenszel and standardization. In P. W. Holland & H. Wainer (Eds.), Differential item functioning (pp. 35-66). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Gullickson, A. R. (1993). Matching measurement instruction to classroom-based evaluation: Perceived discrepancies, needs, and challenges. In S. L. Wise (Ed.), Teacher training in measurement and assessment skills (pp. 1-25). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

  • Ironson, G. H. (1983). Using item response theory to measure bias. In R. K. Hambleton (Ed.), Applications of item response theory. Vancouver: Educational Research Institute of British Columbia.

  • Jacobs, L. C., & Chase, C. I. (1992). Developing and using tests effectively. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

  • Linacre, J., & Wright, B. D. (1987). Item bias:Mantel Haenszel and the Rasch Model Retrieved 20 November, 2009, from http://www.rasch.org/memo39.pdf

  • Linn, R. L., & Miller, M. D. (2005). Measurement and assessment in teaching (9th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.

  • MacBeath, F., & Galton, M. (2004). A life in secondary teaching: Finding time for learning Retrieved 23 March, 2009, from http://www.data.teachers.org.uk/resources/pdf/74262-MacBeath.pdf

  • Marso, R. N., & Pigge, F. L. (1987, October). Teacher-made tests and testing: Classroom resources, guidelines, and practices. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting Of The Midwestern Educational Research Association, Chicago.

  • Marso, R. N., & Pigge, F. L. (1988, April). An analysis of teacher-made tests: Testing practices, cognitive demands, and item construction errors. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting Of The National Council On Measurement In Education, New Orleans, Louisiana

  • McMillan, J. H. (2008). Assessment essentials for standard-based education (2nd ed.). California: Corwin Press.

  • McMorris, R., & Boothroyd, R. (1993). Tests that teachers build: An analysis of classroom tests in Science and Mathematics. Applied Measurement in Education, 6(4), 321-342.

  • Mertler, C. A. (1998, October). Classroom assessment: Practices of Ohio teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, Chicago.

  • Nitko, A. J. (2004). Educational assessment of students (4th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.

  • Ohlsen, M. T. (2007). Classroom assessment practices of secondary school members of NCTM. American Secondary Education, 36(1), 4-13.

  • Penfield, R. D., Alvarez, K., & Lee, O. (2009). Using a taxonomy of differential step functioning form to improve the interpretation of DIF in polytomous items. Applied Measurement in Education, 22(1), 61-78.

  • Penfield, R. D., & Camilli, G. (2007). Differential item functioning and item bias. In S. Sinharay & C. R. Rao (Eds.), Handbook of Statistics (Vol. 26, pp. 126-167). New York: Elsevier.

  • Reckase, M. (1979). Unifactor latent models applied to multi-factor tests: Results and implication. Journal of Education Statistics, 4(4), 207-230.

  • Roussos, L. A., & Stout, W. (2004). Differential item functioning analysis: Detecting DIF item and testing DIF hypotheses. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 107-115). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  • Schafer, W. D. (1989). Assessment essentials in professional education of teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.

  • Schumacker, R. E. (2005). Test bias and Differential Item Functioning Retrieved 22 May, 2009, from www.appliedmeasurementassociates/testbias&dif.pdf

  • Smith, A. B., Wright, E. P., Rush, R., Stark, D. P., Velikova, G., & Selby, P. J. (2006). Rasch analysis of the dimensional structure of the hospital anxiety and depression scale. Psycho-Oncology, 15(9), 817-827.

  • Stiggins, R. J. (1992). High quality classroom assessment: What does it really mean? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 11(2), 35-39.

  • Stiggins, R. J. (1997). Student-centered classroom assessment. New York: Merrill Publishing.

  • Stiggins, R. J. (1999). Evaluating classroom assessment training in teacher education programs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 18(1), 23-27.

  • Stiggins, R. J. (2001). The principals' leadership role in assessment. NASSP Bulletin, 85(13), 13-26.

  • Stiggins, R. J., & Bridgeford, N. J. (1984). The use of performance assessment in the classroom. Portland: Northwest Regional Educational Lab.

  • Trepanier-Street, M. L., McNair, S., & Donegan, M. M. (2001). The views of teachers on assessment: A comparison of lower and upper elementary teachers. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 15(2), 234-241.

  • Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8(3), 370. Retrieved June 23, 2009, from http://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt83.htm

  • Zhang, Z., & Burry-Stock, J. (2003). Classroom assessment practices and teachers' self-perceived assessment skills. Applied Measurement in Education, 16(4), 323-342.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics