Students’ Conceptual Level Of Understanding On Chemical Bonding

Author :  

Year-Number: 2012-Volume 4, Issue 3
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of conceptual change oriented instruction on students’ conceptual understanding of chemical bonding concepts. Pretest - posttest design of quasi-experimental method was used to determine the effectiveness. Traditionally developed textbooks and analogies were utilized in the control group whereas conceptual change texts and Teaching-With-Analogies Model were used in the experiment group. Results revealed that conceptual change oriented instruction caused better understanding, and two modes of instruction developed similar attitude toward chemistry. Science process skill was a strong predictor in understanding, but no effect of gender difference on understanding and on students’ attitudes was found. Also, semi-structured interviews were used to examine students’ understanding in detail.

Keywords

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of conceptual change oriented instruction on students’ conceptual understanding of chemical bonding concepts. Pretest - posttest design of quasi-experimental method was used to determine the effectiveness. Traditionally developed textbooks and analogies were utilized in the control group whereas conceptual change texts and Teaching-With-Analogies Model were used in the experiment group. Results revealed that conceptual change oriented instruction caused better understanding, and two modes of instruction developed similar attitude toward chemistry. Science process skill was a strong predictor in understanding, but no effect of gender difference on understanding and on students’ attitudes was found. Also, semi-structured interviews were used to examine students’ understanding in detail.

Keywords


  • Al Khawaldeh, S.A., & Al Olaimat, A.M. (2010). The contribution of conceptual change texts accompanied by concept mapping to eleventh-grade students understanding of cellular respiration concepts. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19, 115-125.

  • Ausubel, D.P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

  • Azizoglu, N. (2004).Conceptual change oriented instruction and students’ misconceptions in gases. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.

  • Barmby, P., Kind, P. M., & Jones, K. (2008). Examining changing attitudes in secondary school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(8), 1075- 1093

  • Baser, M., & Geban, Ö. (2007).Effectiveness of conceptual change instruction on understanding of heat and temperature concepts.Research in Science & Technological Education, 25(1), 115 – 133.

  • Beall, H.(1999). The ubiquitous metaphors of chemistry teaching.Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 366-368.

  • Birk, J.P., & Kurtz, M.J. (1999). Effect of experience on retention and elimination of misconceptions about molecular structure and bonding.Journal of Chemical Education, 76(1), 124-128.

  • Butts, B., & Smith, R. (1987).HSC chemistry students’ understanding of the structure and properties of molecular and ionic compounds.Research in Science Education, 17, 192- 201.

  • Chambers, S. K., & Andre, T. (1997). Gender, prior knowledge, interest, and experience in electricity and conceptual change text manipulations in learning about direct current.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 107-123.

  • Chang, C. (2002). Does computer assisted instruction + problem solving = Improved science outcomes? A pioneer study.Journal of Educational Research, 95 (3) 143-150.

  • Coll, R. K., & Taylor, N. (2001). Alternative conceptions of chemical bonding held by upper secondary and tertiary students. Research in Science and Technological Education, 19(2), 171-191.

  • Coll, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2001). Learners' mental models of chemical bonding.Research in Science Education, 31, 357-382.

  • Dagher, Z., & Cossman, G. (1992). Verbal explanations given by science teachers: their nature and implications. Journal of Research in Science Teachinq, 29, 361-374.

  • Dahindsa, H.S., & Chung, G. (2003). Attitudes and achievement of Bruneian science students.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(8), 907-922.

  • Dahindsa, H.S., & Treagust, D.F. (2009). Conceptual understanding of Bruneian tertiary students: Chemical bonding and structure. Brunei International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(1), 33-51.

  • Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. Science Education, 75(6), 649–672.

  • Geban, Ö., Aşkar, P., & Özkan, İ. (1992). Effects of computer simulated experiments and problem solving approaches on high school students. Journal of Educational Research, 86, 5 - 10.

  • Geban, Ö., Ertepınar, H., Yılmaz, G., Altın, A., & Şahbaz, F. (1994).Bilgisayar destekli eğitimin öğrencilerin fen bilgisi başarılarına ve fen bilgisi ilgilerine etkisi.I. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri Eğitimi Sempozyumu: Bildiri Özetleri Kitabı, s:1 - 2, 9 Eylül Üniversitesi, İzmir.

  • George, R. (2000). Measuring change in students’ attitudes toward science over time: an application of latent variable growth modeling. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9(3), 213-225.

  • Glynn, S.M. (1991). Explaining Science Concepts: a Teaching-With-Analogies Model. In S.M. Glynn, R.H. Yeany & B.K. Britton (Eds.), The Psychology of Learning Science, 219-239 Hillsdane, NJ, Erlbaum.

  • Glynn, S. M., & Takahashi, T. (1998). Learning from analogy-enhanced science text. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 1129-1149.

  • Harrison, A.G. (1992). Evaluation of a model for teachinq analogies, in secondary science. Unpublished Masters thesis, Curtin University of Technology, Perth.

  • Harrison, A.G., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). Learning about atoms, molecules, and chemical bonds: a case study of multiple model use in grade 11 chemistry. Science Education, 84, 352-381.

  • Harrison, A.G. & Treagust, D.F. (2006). Teaching and learning with analogies. In P.Aubusson, A. Harrison & S.M. Ritchie (Eds.), Metaphor and analogy in science education (pp. 11–24) Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer

  • Henderleiter, J., Smart, R., Anderson, J., & Elian, O. (2001). How do organic chemistry students understand and apply hydrogen bonding? Journal of Chemical Education, 78(8), 1126-1130.

  • Hilton A. & Nichols, K. (2011). Representational Classroom Practices that Contribute to Students’ Conceptual and Representational Understanding of Chemical Bonding, International Journal of Science Education, 33 (16), 2215–2246.

  • Hynd, C. R., McWhorter, J. Y., Phares, V. L.,& Suttles, C. W. (1994). The role of instructional variables in conceptual change in high school physics topics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9),933-946.

  • Iding, M.K. (1993). Instructional analogies and elaborations in science text: Effects on recall and transfer performance. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 14, 33-55.

  • Kenan,O. & Ozmen,H. (2012). Introduction of an enriched computer based teaching material on the particulate nature of matter, e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 7(1), 1C0491.

  • Kind, V. & Kind, P.M (2011). Beginning to teach Chemistry: How personal and academic characteristics of pre-service science teachers compare with their understandings of basic chemical ideas. International Journal of Science Education 33(15), 2123–2158.

  • Nicoll, G. (2001). A report of undergraduates’ bonding misconceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 23(7), 707-730.

  • Niebert,K., Marsc, S. & Treagust, D. (2012). Understanding Needs Embodiment: A Theory-Guided Reanalysis of the Role of Metaphors and Analogies in Understanding Science, Science Education, Ed 96:849 – 877.

  • Okey, J.R., Wise, K.C., & Burns, J.C. (1982). Integrated Process Skill Test-2. (available from Dr. James R. Okey, Department of Science Education, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602).

  • Papanastasiou, C. & Papanastasiou, E. C. (2004).Major influences on attitudes toward science.Educational Research and Evaluation, 10(3), 239-257.

  • Pınarbas ı, T. (2002). Investigations of effectiveness of conceptual change approach on understanding of solubility concepts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ataturk University, Erzurum.

  • Pittman, M.K. (1999). Student-generated analogies: Another way of knowing? Journal of Research in Science Teaching ,36 (1), 1-22.

  • Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W.A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227.

  • Preece, P. F. W., & Brotherton, P. N. (1997). Teaching science process skills: Long-term effects on science achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 895- 901.

  • Rani, F. (2000).Knowledge attitude and practices of general physicians regarding therapeutic diets. M.Sc. Thesis, Rana Liaqat Ali Khan Government College of Home Economics, University of Karachi.

  • Sungur, S., & Tekkaya, C. (2003). Students’ achievements in human circulatory system unit: The effect of reasoning ability and gender. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12(1), 59-64.

  • Taber, K. S. (1994). Misunderstanding the ionic bond. Education in Chemistry, 31(4), 100-103.

  • Taber, K. S., & Coll, R. (2002) Chemical Bonding. In J. K. Gilbert,.et al., (Edit.) Chemical Education: Research- based Practice, Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Tan, K. D., & Treagust, D. F. (1999). Evaluating students’ understanding of chemical bonding. School Science Review, 81(294), 75-83.

  • Thiele, R. & Treagust, D. (1994). An interpretive examination of high school chemistry teachers’ analogical explanations, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 227-242.

  • Thiele, R.B., & Venville, G. (1993). A comparison of analoqies in bioloqy and chemistry textbooks. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta.

  • Treagust, D. F., and Harrison, A. G. (1993). Teaching with analogies: A case study in grade 10 optics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 1291 – 1307.

  • Yilmaz,D., Tekkaya, C. & Sungur, S. (2011). The Comparative Effects of Prediction/Discussion-Based Learning Cycle, Conceptual Change Text, and Traditional Instructions on Student Understanding of Genetics, International Journal of Science Education, 33(5), 15, 607–628.

  • Zook, K.B., & Maier, J.M. (1994). Systematic analysis of variables that contribute to the formation of analogical misconceptions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 589-699.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics