Philosophical Change in Education: A Desired Primary School Model of Primary School Student Teachers

Author :  

Year-Number: 2014-Volume 6, Issue 3
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

Even if the traditional education maintains its characteristics all over the world, it has been widely criticized, as well. This criticism is considered for the development of all school curriculums in Turkey, and proper educational curriculums are prepared in line with the criticism. An attempt to understand the desired primary school model of primary school student teachers basically reveals their educational philosophy. This study aims to scrutinize the philosophical perceptions of primary school teacher students, who study at the Faculty of Education, Pamukkale University, towards educational processes based upon their ideas and experiences. The study based its design on the sequential explanatory design, one of the mixed methods. The study was comprised of 267 primary school student teachers who were enrolled in the Department of Primary School Teaching. Considering the quantitative part of the study based on the understanding of primary school student teachers about their educational philosophy, the participants mostly had popular educational thoughts and applications. The three basic themes were “the school which makes people free”, “the school which teaches life” and “the school which makes people think” in terms of the qualitative part of the study.

Keywords

Abstract

Even if the traditional education maintains its characteristics all over the world, it has been widely criticized, as well. This criticism is considered for the development of all school curriculums in Turkey, and proper educational curriculums are prepared in line with the criticism. An attempt to understand the desired primary school model of primary school student teachers basically reveals their educational philosophy. This study aims to scrutinize the philosophical perceptions of primary school teacher students, who study at the Faculty of Education, Pamukkale University, towards educational processes based upon their ideas and experiences. The study based its design on the sequential explanatory design, one of the mixed methods. The study was comprised of 267 primary school student teachers who were enrolled in the Department of Primary School Teaching. Considering the quantitative part of the study based on the understanding of primary school student teachers about their educational philosophy, the participants mostly had popular educational thoughts and applications. The three basic themes were “the school which makes people free”, “the school which teaches life” and “the school which makes people think” in terms of the qualitative part of the study.

Keywords


  • Altınkurt, Y., Yılmaz, K. & Oğuz, A. (2012). İlköğretim ve ortaöğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin eğitim inançları. [Educatıonal beliefs of primary and secondary school teachers]. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31 (2), 1-19

  • Bingham, C. (2011). Two educational ideas for 2011 and beyond. Studies in Philosophy & Education, 30 (5), 513- 519.

  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

  • Brauner, C. J., & Burns, H. W. (1965). Problems in education an philosophy, In S.Büyükdüvenci (Trans.), Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 15 (2), 291–298.

  • Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five tradition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Çetin, B., İlhan, M., & Arslan, S. (2012). Öğretmen adaylarının benimsedikleri eğitim felsefelerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi [An investigation of educational phisolophies adopted by prospective teachers in terms of various variables]. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 5 (5) 149-170

  • Demirel, Ö. (2011). Kuramdan uygulamaya eğitimde program geliştirme [Theory and application curriculum development in education]. (17th ed.). Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Dewey, J. (2012). School and society. In H.A. Başman (Trans.). (3th ed.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları

  • Doğanay, A. (2011). Hizmet öncesi öğretmen eğitiminin öğretmen adaylarının felsefi bakış açılarına etkisi [The effect of pre-service teacher education on the educational philosophies of prospective teachers]. Eğitim ve Bilim, 36 (161), 332-348

  • Duman, B. (2008). Öğrencilerin benimsedikleri eğitim felsefeleriyle kullanıldıkları öğrenme strateji ve öğrenme stillerinin karşılaştırılması [Learning strategies and learning styles of the students are used to compare the philosophies of education]. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17 (1), 203–224.

  • Duman, B., & Ulubey, Ö. (2008). Öğretmen adaylarının benimsedikleri eğitim felsefelerinin öğretim teknolojilerini ve interneti kullanma düzeylerine etkisi ile ilgili görüşleri [The point of views related to the effects of educational phisolophies adopted by student teachers on the levels of using educational technologies and internet]. Muğla Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 20, 95–114.

  • Eisner, E. W. (1998). The enlightened eye. Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. Upper Sadle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

  • Ekiz, D. (2005). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının eğitim felsefesi akımlarına ilişkin eğilimlerinin karşılaştırılması [Comparision of primary school student-teacher preferences towards educational philosophies]. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19, 1–11.

  • Ekiz, D. (2007). Öğretmen adaylarının eğitim felsefesi akımları hakkında görüşlerinin farklı programlar açısından incelenmesi [Investigation of student-teachers’ views of educational philosophies from the angle of different teacher education programs]. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24, 112.

  • Ergün, M. (2009). Eğitim felsefesi [Philosophy of education]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi

  • Ertürk, S. (1998). Türkiye'de eğitim felsefesi sorunu [Problem of Philosophy of Education in Turkey]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3, 11-16

  • Friere. P. (2013). Pedagogia do oprimido. D.Hattatoğlu & E.Özbek (Trans.) Istanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.

  • Gosselin, C. (2007). Philosophy and the role of teacher reflections on constructing gender. Educational Foundations, 21 (3/4), 39-57.

  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

  • Hamrah, Z. S. (2012). Role of virtual education in higher education from the view of existence philosophy. Journal of Social Sciences, 8 (2): 207-215.

  • Illich, I. (2012). Deschooling society. M. Özay (Trans.). İstanbul: Şule Yayınları.

  • Karadağ, E., Baloğlu, N. & Kaya, S. (2009). Okul yöneticilerinin eğitim felsefesi akımlarını benimseme düzeylerine ilişkin ampirik bir çalışma [An empirical study on school managers’ acceptance level of education philosophies]. Kaygı-Uludağ Üniversitesi Felsefe Dergisi, 12, 181-200.

  • Kumral, O. (2014). Eğitsel düşünce ve uygulamalar ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Developing the Inventory of Educational Thought and Applications: Its Validity and Reliability Analysis]. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi - Journal of Educational Sciences Research 4(2) (In press).

  • Labaree, D. F. (2005). Progressivism, schools and schools of education: An American romance. Paedagogica Historica, 41, 275–288

  • Maxwell, J. A. (1996) Qualitative research design. Sage Publication: London.

  • McLaren, P. (2011). An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundaditions of education. M.Y. Eryaman & H. Arslan (Trans.). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık

  • McNeil, J. D. (1996). Curriculum: A comprehensive introduction. New York: Harper Collians.

  • Merriam, S. B. (1998) Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.

  • Meyer, D. L. (2009). The poverty of constructivism. Educational philosophy and theory, 41 (3), 332-341.

  • Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. B. (1988). Curriculum. Foundations, principles and issues. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

  • Ortaylı, İ. (1996). Maarifin son 150 yıldaki serencamı [The end of the last 150 years of education]. Yeni Türkiye, 7, 462-466.

  • Reed, D. F., Davis, M. D. (1999). Social reconstructionism for urban students. Clearing House, 72 (5), 291-295

  • Saeverot, H. (2011). Kierkegaard, seduction, and existential education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 30 (6), 557-572.

  • Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

  • Soykan, Ö. N. (1997). Eğip bükmeyen bir eğitim nasıl olmalıdır? [How should be a training as not to be bow?] Türkiye 2. Eğitim Felsefesi Kongresi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Yayınları: Van

  • Sönmez, V. (2008). Bilim felsefesi [Philosophy of science]. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık

  • Sönmez, V. (2009). Eğitim felsefesi [Philosophy of education]. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık

  • Stake, E. R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.

  • T.T.K.B. (2005) Yeni programa ilişkin açıklamalar [Information on the new program]. Retrieved from http://www.ttkb.meb.gov.tr at August 29, 2005

  • Tozlu, N. (1997). Eğitim felsefesi [Philosophy of education]. İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları

  • Turgut, İ. (1996). Eğitim üzerine felsefi bir deneme [A philosophical essay on education]. İzmir: Anadolu Matbaası

  • Üstüner, M. (2008). The comparison of the educational philosophies of Turkish primary school superintendents and teachers. Eğitim Araştırmaları-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 33, 177-192

  • Veal, W.R. (2007). The angle of incidence of progressivism in rural science education. Curriculum & teaching dialogue, 9 (1/2), 201-219.

  • Vitamin Öğretmen Portalı. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.vitaminogretmen.com/videolar/#10|8 at March 20,

  • Wiersma, W. (2003) Research methods in education: An introduction (3th ed.). Revised Printing, Allyn and Bacon, Int.

  • Winch, C. (2012). For philosophy of education in teacher education. Oxford Review of Education, 38 (3), 305–

  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in social sciences]. Ankara: Seçkin.

  • YÖK. (2006). Eğitim fakültelerinde uygulanacak yeni programlar hakkında açıklama [Description on faculties of education implemented new programs]. Retrieved from http://www.yok.gov.tr/index.php? option=com_docm at September 9, 2006

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics