An inquiry into leadership capacity: The case of Turkish primary schools

Author :  

Year-Number: 2015-Volume 7, Issue 1
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

The growing research interest in educational leadership requires the investigation of new school leadership perspectives as schools become more complex structures. This article explored the perceptions of primary school teachers and administrators on leadership capacity of their schools and related factors. This study employed a mixed method in which both quantitative and qualitative research methods were used together. A total of 2370 participants including teachers, vice principals and principals from 179 primary schools were included in the quantitative part of the study while 18 participants including teachers and school administrators participated in the qualitative part of the study. The research findings suggested that participants' levels of perception on distributed leadership and shared school vision subscales were lower than their levels of perceptions on collaboration and shared responsibility and perceived student achievement. The findings also illustrated that participants from schools with high leadership capacity thought they participated in vision building and instructional decision-making processes more frequently. The paper draws implications for improving teaching and learning in the schoolhouse.

Keywords

Abstract

The growing research interest in educational leadership requires the investigation of new school leadership perspectives as schools become more complex structures. This article explored the perceptions of primary school teachers and administrators on leadership capacity of their schools and related factors. This study employed a mixed method in which both quantitative and qualitative research methods were used together. A total of 2370 participants including teachers, vice principals and principals from 179 primary schools were included in the quantitative part of the study while 18 participants including teachers and school administrators participated in the qualitative part of the study. The research findings suggested that participants' levels of perception on distributed leadership and shared school vision subscales were lower than their levels of perceptions on collaboration and shared responsibility and perceived student achievement. The findings also illustrated that participants from schools with high leadership capacity thought they participated in vision building and instructional decision-making processes more frequently. The paper draws implications for improving teaching and learning in the schoolhouse.

Keywords


  • Akbaba Altun, S. (2003). Elementary school principals' perceptions and performance about transformational leadership. Elementary Education Online, 2(1), 10-17.

  • Alig-Mielcarek, J. M. (2003). A model of school success: Instructional leadership, academic press, and student achievement (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis database. (UMI No. 3093620)

  • Barth, R. S. (1990). Improving schools from within. Teachers, parents, and principals can make the difference. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

  • Blase, J., & Blase, J. (1999). Principals’ instructional leadership and teacher development: teachers’ perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 349-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013161X99353003

  • Blase, J., & Blase, J. (2000). Effective instructional leadership: Teachers’ perspectives on how principals promote teaching and learning in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 130-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09578230010320082

  • Botello, M. L. (1997). The instructional leadership role of the elementary principal in school-wide improvement (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis database. (UMI No. 9727701)

  • Borko, H., Wolf, S. A., Simone, G., & Uchiyama, K. P. (2003). Schools in transition: Reform efforts and school capacity in Washington State. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis Summer, 25(2), 171-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/01623737025002171

  • Bozman, C. E. (2011). The effects of principals' leadership styles, teacher efficacy, and teachers’ trust in their principals on student achievement (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis database. (UMI No. 3468683).

  • Buluç, B. (2009). The relationship between bureaucratic school structure and leadership styles of school principals in primary schools. Education and Science, 34(152), 71-86.

  • Bush, T. (1998). The national professional qualification for headship: The key to effective school leadership? School Leadership & Management, 18(3), 321-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13632439869529

  • Can, N. (2009). Teacher leadership. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.

  • Cemaloğlu, N. (2007). An analysis of the school administrators’ leadership styles in terms of different variables. Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 5(1), 73-112.

  • Conzemius, A., & O'Neill, J. (2001). Building shared responsibility for student learning. Alexandria, Virginia, USA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

  • D'Ambrosio, C. L. (2006). Leadership capacity: Principal and teacher perceptions of Lambert's essential elements (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis database. (UMI No. 3202729)

  • Delaney, J. G. (1997). Principal leadership: A primary factor in school-based management and school improvement. NASSP Bulletin, 81, 107-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019263659708158613

  • Dinham, S., & Crowther, F. (2011). Sustainable school capacity building - One step back, two steps forward? Journal of Educational Administration, 49(6), 616-623.

  • Eldred, J. A. (2010). A study to determine the relationship between the perceived leadership styles of school principals and teacher job satisfaction at selected elementary schools (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis database. (UMI No. 341247)

  • Fink, D. (2011). Pipelines, pools and reservoirs: Building leadership capacity for sustained improvement. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(6), 670-684.

  • Foster, R., & St. Hilaire, B. (2004). The who, how, why, and what of leadership in secondary school improvement: Lessons learned in England. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 50(4), 354-369.

  • Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (Eighth ed.). New York: The McGraw-Hill Book Company.

  • Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

  • Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership and sustainability: System thinkers in action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

  • Fullan, M., Bertani, A., & Quinn, J. (2004). New lessons for district wide reform. Educational Leadership, 61(7), 42-46.

  • Gambini, F. (2011). Leadership capacity for succession and sustainability in a family- owned private school (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis database. (UMI No. 3465438)

  • Gentilucci, J. L., & Muto, C. C. (2007). Principals' influence on academic achievement: The student perspective. NASSP Bulletin, 91(3), 219-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192636507303738

  • Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership. In K. Leithwood and P. Hallinger (Eds.). Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 653-696). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

  • Grubb, W. N., & Flessa, J. J. (2006). “A job too big for one”: Multiple principals and other nontraditional approaches to school leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(4), 518-550. . http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013161X06290641

  • Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. London: Cassell; New York: Teachers College.

  • Hargreaves, D. H. (2011). System redesign for system capacity building. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(6), 685-700.

  • Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2003). Sustaining leadership. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(9), 693-700.

  • Harms, P. D., & Credé, M. (2010). Emotional intelligence and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta analysis. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 17(1), 5-17.

  • Harris, A. (2000). What works in school improvement? Lessons from the field and future directions, Educational Research, 42(1), 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/001318800363872

  • Harris, A. (2008). Leading sustainable schools. Millbank: Specialist Schools and Academies Trust.

  • Harris, A., & Jackson, D. (1997). Understanding the school's capacity for development: Growth states and strategies. School Leadership & Management, 17(3), 401-412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13632439769944

  • Harris, A., & Lambert, L. (2003). Building leadership capacity for school improvement. Maidenhead, Philadelphia: Open University.

  • Harris, A., & Muijs, D. (2003). Teacher leadership and school improvement. Education Review, 16(2), 39-42.

  • Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the principal's contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 9(2), 157-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0924345980090203

  • Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership & Management: Formerly School Organisation, 30(2), 95-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13632431003663214

  • Hearn, R. M. (2010). An evaluation of instructional coaching at selected high schools in North Louisiana and its effect on student achievement, organizational climate, and teacher efficacy (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis database. (UMI No. 3411210)

  • Jackson, D. S. (2000). The school improvement journey: Perspectives on leadership. School Leadership & Management, 20(1), 61-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13632430068888

  • Jenkins, J. M. (1985/March). Effective leadership for instructional improvement. Paper presented at the NASSP Institute, Houston, TX, March 7-9, 1985.

  • Katzenmeyer. M., & Moller, G. (2009). Awakening the sleeping giant. Helping teachers develop as leaders (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin.

  • Kılınç, A. Ç. (2013). Determining leadership capacity in primary schools Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Gazi University, Ankara.

  • King, M. B., & Bouchard, K. (2011). The capacity to build organizational capacity in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(6), 653-669.

  • Korkmaz, M. (2006). The relationship between organizational health and robust school vision in elementary schools. Educational Research Quarterly, 30(1), 14-36.

  • Krug, S. E. (1992). Instructional leadership, school instructional climate, and student learning outcomes. Project Report. Illionis: National Center for School Leadership. (ED 359 668). Retrieved May 10, 2011, from http://www.eric.ed.gov

  • Kythreotis, A., Pashiardis, P., & Kyriakides, L. (2010). The influence of school leadership styles and culture on students’ achievement in Cyprus primary schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(2), 218240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09578231011027860

  • Lambert, L. (1998). Building leadership capacity in schools. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

  • Lambert, L. (2003). Leadership capacity for lasting school improvement. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

  • Lambert, L. (2005). What does leadership capacity really mean? Journal of Staff Development, 26(2), 38-40.

  • Lambert, L. (2009). Reconceptualizing the road toward leadership capacity. In A. M. Blankstein, P. D. Houston, R. W. Cole (Eds.), Building sustainable leadership capacity (pp. 7-28). Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin.

  • Lashway, L. (1997). Leading with vision. Eugene, Oregon: Clearinghouse on Educational Management. Retrieved November 22, 2012, from http://scholarsbank.uoregon.e du/jspui/bitstream/1794/3273/1/lead ing_with_vision.pdf

  • Ledbedder, C. L. (2007). An analysis of leadership capacity development in Alabama (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis database. (UMI No. 3301924)

  • Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership and Management, 28(1), 27-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13632430701800060

  • Leithwood, K., Patten, S., & Jantzi, D. (2010). Testing a conception of how school leadership influences student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly 46(5), 671-706.

  • Louis, K. S., Dretzke, B., & Wahlstrom, K. (2010). How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 21(3), 315-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2010.486586

  • Marzano, R., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

  • Ministry of National Education (MoNE). (2012). Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education: Regulation of primary education institutions, available at: http://mevzuat.meb.gov.tr/html/225_2. html (accessed December 8, 2013).

  • Ministry of National Education (MoNE). (2013). Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education: National education statistics, available at: www.meb.gov.tr (accessed December 10, 2013).

  • Myers, D. E. (1987). The effect of principals' leadership styles on teacher absence (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis database. (UMI No. 8716456)

  • Nettles, S. M., & Herrington, C. (2007). Revisiting the importance of the direct effects of school leadership on student achievement: The implications for school improvement policy. Peabody Journal of Education, 82(4), 724-736. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01619560701603239

  • Newmann, F. M., Smith, B., Allensworth, E., & Bryk, A. S. (2001). Instructional program coherence: What it is and why it should guide school improvement policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(4), 297-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/01623737023004297

  • O’Donnell, R. J., & White, G. P. (2005). Within the accountability era: Principals' instructional leadership behaviors and student achievement. NASSP Bulletin, 89(645), 56-71.

  • Ogawa, R. T., & Bossert, S. T. (2000). Leadership as an organizational quality. In The Jossey-Bass reader on educational leadership (pp. 38-58). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Quinn, P. M. (2002). The impact of principal leadership on instructional practice and student engagement. Journal of Educational Administration, 40(5), 447-467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09578230210440294

  • Pichon, C. (2010). The effects of elementary school principals' leadership styles and the preferred managerial styles of teachers on student achievement (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis database. (UMI No. 3447334)

  • Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, J. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509

  • Sammons, P., Gu, Q., Day, C., & Ko, J. (2011). Exploring the impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes: Results from a study of academically improved and effective schools in England. International Journal of Educational Management, 25(1), 83-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513541111100134

  • Senge, P. M. (2007). Beşinci disiplin [The fifth sense] (Trans. A. İldeniz & A. Doğukan). İstanbul, Turkey: Yapı Kredi. Original Publication Date: 1990.

  • Spillane, J. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. The Educational Forum, 69(2), 143-150.

  • Spillane, J. P., Diamond, J. B., & Jita, L. (2003). Leading instruction: The distribution of leadership for instruction. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(5), 533-543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0022027021000041972

  • TSI. (2008). Turkish Statistical Institute, retrived from www.tuik.gov.tr at December 10, 2013.

  • Valentine, J. W., & Prater, M. (2011). Instructional, transformational, and managerial leadership and student achievement: High school principals make a difference. NASSP Bulletin, 95(1), 5-30.

  • Witziers, B., Bosker, R. J., & Krüger, M. L. (2003). Educational leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association. Educational Administration Quarterly 39(3), 398-425.

  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (8. Baskı) [Qualitative research methods in social sciences (8th Ed.). Ankara: Seçkin.

  • Yılmaz, A., & Ceylan, Ç. B. (2011). Relationship between primary school administrators’ leadership behavior and job satisfaction of teachers. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 17(2), 277-394.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics