The Examination of the Secondary School Students’ Levels of Psychological Well-Being in Terms of Some Variables

Author :  

Year-Number: 2015-Volume 7, Issue 4
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the secondary school students’ psychological well-being in terms of some variables. The quantitative survey method was used in this study. Study group in this research consists of 381 students who are studying in private and state schools in during the 2014-2015 academic year. The data was collected by using “Personal Information Forms”, developed by the researcher. Also to determine the psychological well-beingof the students, the 42-items version of "Psychological Well-Being Scales" (PİOÖ) which was developed by Ryff (1989), revised by Ryff and Keyes (1995), and adapted by Akın et al. (2012) was used. To analyze the data obtained from this study, various inferential analyses tests such as T test, (Kruskal Wallis), LSD, (Scheffe), U test and ANOVA were used (p<0.05).According to the results gathered from the research, in terms of gender, only in the autonomysub-dimension there is a significant difference in favor of males; in terms of socioeconomic variable, there is a significant difference against those who has low socioeconomic levels; in terms of the variants of attitudes of family, there is a significant difference in favor of those whose parents withdemocratic attitude; in terms of academic achievement, there is a significant difference in favor of high academic achievement for those whose psychological well-being is high; in terms of health variables, there is a significant difference in favor of thosewho reported health was important to them; in terms of groups’ doing sports, exercise and etc. variables, there is a significant difference in favor of those who do sports and exercise.

Keywords

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the secondary school students’ psychological well-being in terms of some variables. The quantitative survey method was used in this study. Study group in this research consists of 381 students who are studying in private and state schools in during the 2014-2015 academic year. The data was collected by using “Personal Information Forms”, developed by the researcher. Also to determine the psychological well-beingof the students, the 42-items version of "Psychological Well-Being Scales" (PİOÖ) which was developed by Ryff (1989), revised by Ryff and Keyes (1995), and adapted by Akın et al. (2012) was used. To analyze the data obtained from this study, various inferential analyses tests such as T test, (Kruskal Wallis), LSD, (Scheffe), U test and ANOVA were used (p<0.05).According to the results gathered from the research, in terms of gender, only in the autonomysub-dimension there is a significant difference in favor of males; in terms of socioeconomic variable, there is a significant difference against those who has low socioeconomic levels; in terms of the variants of attitudes of family, there is a significant difference in favor of those whose parents withdemocratic attitude; in terms of academic achievement, there is a significant difference in favor of high academic achievement for those whose psychological well-being is high; in terms of health variables, there is a significant difference in favor of thosewho reported health was important to them; in terms of groups’ doing sports, exercise and etc. variables, there is a significant difference in favor of those who do sports and exercise.

Keywords


  • Abbott, R., Ploubidis, G., Huppert, F., Kuh, D., & Croudace, T. (2010). An evaluation of the precision of measurement ofRyff’s psychological well-being scales in a population sample. Social Indicators Research, 97(3), 357-373.

  • Akın, A. (2009). The impacts of rational, emotional behavioral therapy oriented group counseling on psychological well-being and self-sensitivity. Unpublished doctorate dissertation. Sakarya University Institute of Social Sciences: Sakarya.

  • Anlı, G. (2011). Investigation of the relationship between psychological well-being and self-sabotage with various variables. Unpublished MA dissertation. Sakarya University, Institute of Social Sciences, Sakarya.

  • Biswas-Diener, R., Diener, E. & Tamir, M.(2004). The psychology of subjective well-being. Daedalus, 133(2), 18-26.

  • Block, J. & Kremen, A., (1996). IQ and ego resiliency: Conceptual and empirical connections and separateness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 349-361.

  • Bonanno, G. A., (2005). Resilience in the face of potential trauma, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(3), 135-138.

  • Cenkseven, F. (2004). Investigation of the predictors of university students’ subjective and psychological well-being. Unpublished doctorate dissertation. Çukurova University Institute of Social Sciences, Adana.

  • Cenkseven, F. & Akbaş, T. (2007). Investigation of predictive variables of university students’ subjective and psychological well-being. The Journal of Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance, 27, 43-65.

  • Çivitci, A. (2009). Life satisfaction in elementary school students: The roles of some personal and familial characteristics. Uludağ University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 22(1), 29-52.

  • Connor, K. M., (2006). Assessment of resilience in the aftermath of trauma. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry,

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 1-11.

  • Diener, E, Scollon, C., (2003). Subjective well-being is desirable, but not the summum bonum. University of Minnesota Interdisciplinary Workshop on Well-Being. (October 23-25), Minneapolis.

  • Diener, E., (1984). Subjective Well-Being. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 542–575.

  • Dost, M.T. (2006). Subjective well-being among university students. Hacettepe University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 31, 188-197.

  • Easterlin, R. A. (2003). Explaining happiness. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 11176-11183.

  • Ekşioğlu, H. (2011). The relationship between the style of world vision ownership or belief and psychological well- being. Unpublished MA Dissertation. Cumhuriyet University, Institute of Social Sciences, Sivas.

  • Erözkan, A. (2011). Attachment styles and decision making strategies of university students. The Journal of International Avrasya Faculty of Social Sciences, 2(3), 60-74.

  • Frisch, M. B., Cornell, J., Villanueva, M., Retzlaff, P.J., (1992).Clinical validation of the quality of life inventory: A measure of life satisfaction for use in treatment planning and outcome assessment. Psychological Assessment, 4, 92-101.

  • Gençöz, T., Özlale, Y. (2004). Direct and indirect effects of social support on psychological well-being. Social Behavior and Personality, 32(5), 449-458.

  • Gülaçtı, F. (2009). The effect of the social skills training programme on university students’ level of social skills, the subjective and psychological well-being. Unpublished doctorate Dissertation. Atatürk University, Institute of Social Sciences, Erzurum.

  • Haring, M. J., Stock, W. A. & Okun, M. A. (1984). A research synthesis of gender and social class as correlates of subjective well-being. Human Relations, 37, 645–657.

  • Hori, M. (2010). Gender differences & cultural contexts: psychological well-being in cross-national perspective. Unpublished dissertation fort the degree of doctor of philosophy, Louisiana State University, Louisiana, USA.

  • Huppert, F. A., Baylis, N. & Keverne, B. (2004). Introduction: Why do we need a science of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society B, 359, 1331-1332.

  • Kaplan, G. A., Shema, S. J. & A Leite, C. M., (2008). Socio-economic determinants of psychological well- being: The role of income, income change, and income sources during the course of 29 years. AEP,

  • Kaya, A., Bozaslan, H. & Genç, G. (2012). The effect of the parents’ attitudes on university students’ problem- solving skills, social concerns and academic achievement. Dicle University Ziya Gökalp Journal of the Faculty of Education, 18, 208-225.

  • Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., Ryff, C. D., (2002). Optimizing well-being: The emprical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007- 1022.

  • Kirkcoldy, B., Furnham, A. F. & Siefen, R. G. (2010). The effects of gender on physical and psychological well-being and life satisfaction among an adult population. International Journal of Child Health and Human Development, 3(3), 307-320.

  • Lyubomirsky, S., Lepper, H. S., (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46, 137-155.

  • Pargament, K. I., (2005). Pain and Sweet: An Assessment of Cost and Benefits of religiosity, trans. A.U. Mehmedoğlu. ÇÜİFD, 5(1), 279-313.

  • Ryan, R. M.,& Deci, E. L., (2001). On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudemonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141-166.

  • Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081.

  • Ryff, C. D. (1995). Psychological well-being in adult life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(4), 99–

  • Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M., (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069-1081.

  • Seligman, M. (2002). Authentic Happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: Free Press.

  • Selingman, M. E. P. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5-14.

  • Tanhan, F. (2007). The impacts of training to deal with death anxiety on the level of anxiety of death and psychological well-being. Unpublished doctorate dissertation. Ankara University Institute of Education Sciences.

  • Tartakovsky, E. (2009). The psychological well-being of unaccompanied minors: A longitudinal study of adolescents immigrating from Russia and Ukraine to israel without parents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19(2), 177-204.

  • Timur, M. S. (2008). The examination of factors that affect married individuals’ psychological well-being levels who are in divorce process and not in divorce process. Unpublished MA dissertation. Ankara University Institute of Education Sciences, Ankara.

  • Tuzgöl-Dost, M. (2006). Subjective well-being among university students, Hacettepe University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 31, 188-197.

  • Wang, C. C. & Sound, C. C. (2008). The role of generational status, self-esteem, academic self-efficacy, and perceived social support in college students' psychological weil-being, Journal of College Counseling, 11, 101-118.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics