The Relationship between Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and Raven Standard Progressive Matrices: A Latent Variable Analysis (Pages: 48 - 56)

Author :  

Year-Number: 2016-Volume 8, Issue 1
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

To investigate the relationship between the executive functions and the fluid intelligence, the relationship between two problem solving tests, namely the Wisconsin Cart Sorting Test (WCST, a widely accepted test of the executive functioning) and the Raven Standard Progressive Matrices Test (RSPMT, the most frequently used measure of the fluid intelligence) was analyzed by means of the relationship between the Structural Equation Models (SEM). 175 healthy university students participated in the study. RSPMT and WCST were used as data collection instruments. Significant correlations were obtained between the RSPMT`s total score, timing score and twelve different scores of WCST. Following the research hypotheses, the data obtained were analyzed by means of structural equation modeling. These findings further supported the relationship between the two tests. As a contribution to the literature, it was shown that besides updating and inhibition, set-formation is also significantly associated with fluid inteligence. The notion which proposes that the executive functions are the reflection of general intelligence and they represent the individual differences in the fluid intelligence performance has been supported with further scientific evidence.

Keywords

Abstract

To investigate the relationship between the executive functions and the fluid intelligence, the relationship between two problem solving tests, namely the Wisconsin Cart Sorting Test (WCST, a widely accepted test of the executive functioning) and the Raven Standard Progressive Matrices Test (RSPMT, the most frequently used measure of the fluid intelligence) was analyzed by means of the relationship between the Structural Equation Models (SEM). 175 healthy university students participated in the study. RSPMT and WCST were used as data collection instruments. Significant correlations were obtained between the RSPMT`s total score, timing score and twelve different scores of WCST. Following the research hypotheses, the data obtained were analyzed by means of structural equation modeling. These findings further supported the relationship between the two tests. As a contribution to the literature, it was shown that besides updating and inhibition, set-formation is also significantly associated with fluid inteligence. The notion which proposes that the executive functions are the reflection of general intelligence and they represent the individual differences in the fluid intelligence performance has been supported with further scientific evidence.

Keywords


  • Alvarez, J.A.,& Emory, E. (2006). Executive function and frontal lobes: A meta-analytic Review. Neuropsychology Review, 16 (1), 17-42.

  • Anderson, V., Northam, E., Hendy, J., & Wrenall, J. (2001). Developmental neuropsychology: A clinical aprroach. New York: Psychology Press.

  • Ardila, A. (2008). On the evolutionary origins of executive functions. Brain and Cognition 68(1) 92-99. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2008.03.003

  • Baddeley, A.D. (1986). Working memory. NewYork: Oxford University Press.

  • Banich, M.T. (2004). Cognitive neuroscience and neurupsychology. Boston: Hougton Mifflin.

  • Brydges, C., Reid, C.L., Fox, A.M. & Anderson M. (2012). A unitary executive function predicts intelligence in children. Intelligence 40,458-469. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2012.05.006.

  • Carpenter, P., Just, M.A., & Shell, P. (1990). What one intelligence test measures, a theoretical account of the processing in the raven progressive matrices test. Psychological Review 97, 404- 431.

  • Carroll, J.B. (1997). Psychometrics, intelligence and public. Intelligence 24 (1) 25-52.

  • Cattell, R.B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology 54: 1-22.

  • Crinella, F.M., Yu, J. (2000). Brain mechanism and intelligence: Psychometric and executive function. Intelligence, 27 (4) 299-327.

  • Colom, R., Rubio, V.J., Shih, C.P., & Santacreu, J. (2006). Fluid intelligence working memory and executive functioning. Psicothema 18, (4) 816-821.

  • Decker, S.L., Hill, K.H., & Dean, R.S., (2007). Evidence of construct similarity in executive functions and fluid reasoning abilities. International Journal of Neuroscience, 117, 735-748, doi:10.1080/00207450600910085

  • Delis, D., Kaplan. E., & Kramer, N. (2001). Delis-Kaplan executive function system. Odessa FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

  • Duncan, J., Burgess, P., & Emslie, H. (1995). Fluid intelligence after frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia, 33(3),

  • Duncan, J.& Owen, A.M. (2000).Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands. Trends in Neurosciences, 23,475-483.

  • Elliot, R. (2003). Executive functions and their disorders. British Medical Bulletin, 65(1), 49-59. doi:10.1093/bmb/65.1.49

  • Friedman, N.P., Miyake, A., Corley, R.P., Young, S.E., De Fries, J.C., & Hewitt, J.K., (2006). Not all executive functions are related to intelligence. Psychological Science, 17(2), 172-179. doi: 10.1111/j.14679280.2006.01681.x

  • Gray, J.R., Chabris, C.F., & Braver, T.S. (2003). Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence. Nature Neuroscience 6 3: 316-322, doi: 10.1038/nn1014

  • Heaton, R.K., Chelune, G.J., Talley, J.L., Kay, G.G., & Curtiss, G. (1993). Wisconsin Card Sorting Manuel. Florida: PAR.

  • Horn, J.L., & Cattel, R.B. (1968). Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized general intelligences . Journal of Educational Psychology, 57 (5) 253-270. doi.apa.org/journals/edu/57/5/253.pdf

  • Jurado, M.B., & Roselli, M. (2007). The elusive nature of executive functions:A review of our current understanding. Neuropsychol Rev, 17: 213-233. doi 10.1007/s11065-007-9040-z

  • Lezak, M.D. (1983). Neuropsychological assessment (2nd ed.) New York:Oxford Univesity Press.

  • Lezak, M.D., Howieson, D.B., Loring, D.W., & Hanay, J. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment. (4th ed.). New York:Oxford Univesity Press.

  • Lezak, M.D., Howieson, D.B., Bigler, E.D., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological assessment (5th ed.). New York: Oxford Univesity Press.

  • Lovatt, M.C.(2002). Problem solving. In D.L. Medlin (Ed.), Steven’s handbook experimental psychology. (pp. 317- 362). New York:Wiley.

  • Luria, A.R. (1966). Human brain and psychological processes. New York: Harper & Row.

  • Luria, A.R. (1969). Frontal lobe syndromes. In P.J. Vinken & G.W. Ruyn (Eds.), Handbook of clinical neurology (Vol. 2, pp. 725-757). Amsterdam: Elsevier-North Holland. Luria, A.R. (1980). Higher cortical functions in man (2nd ed.). New York: Plenum. Kafadar, H. (2004a).Prediction of fluid intelligence through performance intelligence, verbal intelligence, executive functions, working memory, selective attention and short term memory processes. Unpublished doctorate thesis, Ankara: Hacettepe University.

  • Kafadar, H. (2004b).Between intelligence and cognitive processes relationship. 3P Journal 12(3), 171-190.

  • Kafadar, H. (2012). Cognitive model of problem solving. New Symposium, 50 (4), 195-206.

  • Koechlin, E. , Corrado, G., Pietrini, P., & Grafman, J. (2000). Dissociating the role of the medial and lateral anterior prefrontal cortex in human planning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America 97 (13), 7651-7656. doi: 10.1073/pnas.130177397

  • Miyake, A., Friedman, N.P., Emerson, M.J., Witzki, A.H., Howerter, A.,& Wager, T.D. (2000) The unity and diversty of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks : A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49-100. doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0734

  • Monchi, O., Ko, J.H., & Strafellab, A.P. (2006). Striatal dopamine release during performance of executive functions: A [11C] raclopride PET study. Neuroimage, 33, 907–912 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.058 Pennington, B. F., Bennetto, L., McAleer, O., & Roberts, Jr. R. J. (1996). Executive functions and working memory: Theoretical and measurement issues. In G. R. Lyon & N. A. Krasnegor, (Eds.), Attention, memory, and executive function (pp. 327–348). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.

  • Piguet, O., Grayson, G., Browe, A., Tate, H., Lye, T., Ceasey, H. & Ridley, L. (2002). Normal aging and executive functions in old-old community dwellers: Poor perfomance is not an inevitable outcome. International Psychogeriatric Association, 14 (2), 139-159.

  • Raven, J., Raven, C.,& Court, J.H. (2000). Manual for Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Section 3: The standard progressive matrices. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.

  • Roca, M., Parr, A., Thompson, R., Woolgar, A., Torralva, T., Antoun, N., Manes, F., & Duncan, .J (2010). Executive function and fluid intelligence after frontal lobe lesions . Brain, 133 (1), 234-247. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp269

  • Rockstroh, S., Schweizer, K. (2001). The contributions of memory and attention processes to cognitive abilities. Journal of General Psychology, 128: 30–42.

  • Saggino, A., Perfetti, B., Spitoni, G., & Galati, G. (2006). Fluid intelligence andexecutive functions: New perspectives. In: L. V. Wesley (Ed.), Intelligence: New Research (pp. 1–22). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.

  • Salthouse, T.A, Fristoe, N., McGuthry, K.E.,& Hambrick, D.Z. (1998). Relation of task switching to speed, age, and fluid intelligence. Psychology & Aging, 13, 445–461.

  • Salthouse, T.A., Atkinson, T., Berish, D. (2003). Executive functioning as a potential mediator of age-related cognitive decline in normal adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 132 (4), 566-594, doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.4.566

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Stuss, D.T., Floden, D., Alexander, M.P., Levine, B., Katz, D. (2001). Stroop performance in focal lesion patients: Dissociation of processes and frontal lobe lesion location. Neuropsychologia, 39, 771-786.

  • Stuss ,D.T., & Alexander, M.P. (2000). Executive functions and the frontal lobes: a conteptual view. Psychological Research, 63 (3-4) 289-298.

  • Solso, R.L., Maclin, & M.K., Maclin, O.T. (2007). Cognitive psychology (7th Ed.) USA: Pearson Allyn and Bacon.

  • Sümer, N. (2000). Structural equation modeling: Basic copncepta and applications.Turkish Psychological Review, 3(6), 49-74.

  • Unsworth. N., Miller, J.D., Lakey, C.E., Young, D.L., Meeks, J.T., Campbell, W.K., & Goodie, A.S. (2009). Exploring the relations among executive functions fluid intelligence and personality. Journal of Individual Differences, 30(4), 194-200, doi:10.1027/1614-0001.30.4.194

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics