An Investigation of Secondary School Students’ Written Vocabulary

Author :  

Year-Number: 2016-Volume 8, Issue 2
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

A majority of the studies in language education are designed to measure students’ vocabulary size. Thus, they point to the fact that children receive education that focuses on language and comprehension tools, and content materials are taught and tested. Experiments have been conducted to determine the effect of vocabulary size on the performance of linguistic skills in Turkey and confirmed that vocabulary size affects reading and listening comprehension. This paper uses causal comparison scanning, which investigates the causes and effects of the difference between specific groups and how much a dependent variable is affected by an independent variable. The population of this research is seventh and eighth grade students in the city of Istanbul. Socioeconomic variables were considered in the selection of the sample. There are 151 seventh graders and 102 eight graders. The results of the analyses indicate that the students in the sample have significantly different vocabulary assets depending on their SES, gender, reading habit, and reading frequencies variables. The analysis conducted to find the effect of the grade variable shows that the only significant difference is in favour of the seventh grade students’ total word count. Overall, it is reasonable to argue that male students, socioeconomically disadvantaged students and students who do not have reading habits need more support in vocabulary teaching.. Since vocabulary teaching is not systematically planned in Turkey, educational planners should consider doing so. Finally, research should be conducted to improve vocabulary teaching and test the effectiveness of new educational programs and practices.

Keywords

Abstract

A majority of the studies in language education are designed to measure students’ vocabulary size. Thus, they point to the fact that children receive education that focuses on language and comprehension tools, and content materials are taught and tested. Experiments have been conducted to determine the effect of vocabulary size on the performance of linguistic skills in Turkey and confirmed that vocabulary size affects reading and listening comprehension. This paper uses causal comparison scanning, which investigates the causes and effects of the difference between specific groups and how much a dependent variable is affected by an independent variable. The population of this research is seventh and eighth grade students in the city of Istanbul. Socioeconomic variables were considered in the selection of the sample. There are 151 seventh graders and 102 eight graders. The results of the analyses indicate that the students in the sample have significantly different vocabulary assets depending on their SES, gender, reading habit, and reading frequencies variables. The analysis conducted to find the effect of the grade variable shows that the only significant difference is in favour of the seventh grade students’ total word count. Overall, it is reasonable to argue that male students, socioeconomically disadvantaged students and students who do not have reading habits need more support in vocabulary teaching.. Since vocabulary teaching is not systematically planned in Turkey, educational planners should consider doing so. Finally, research should be conducted to improve vocabulary teaching and test the effectiveness of new educational programs and practices.

Keywords


  • Aksan, D. (1996). Türkçenin sözvarlığı, Ankara: Engin Yayınevi.

  • Aksan, D. (2002). Anadilimizin söz denizinde, Ankara: Bilgi Yayınevi.

  • Allen, J. (1999). Words, words, words : teaching vocabulary in grades 4–12. USA: Stanhouse Publishers.

  • Andersson, I., Gauding, J., Graca, A., Holm, K., Öhlin, L., Marklund, U. et al. (2011). Productive vocabulary size development in children aged 18-24 months-gender differences. In Proceedings from Fonetic (pp. 109-112).

  • Ashcraft, M.H. (2002). Cognition (3rd Ed.). NJ: Prentice Hall.

  • Barber, C. (2000). The English language: A historical introduction. Cambridge, England: Cambridge

  • Baş, B. (2006). 1985-2005 yılları arasında çocuk edebiyatı sahasında yazılmış tahkiyeli metinlerin söz varlığı üzerine bir araştırma. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.

  • Blachowicz, C. L. Z.; Fisher, P. J., & Watts-Taffe, S. (2005). Integrated vocabulary instruction: Meeting the needs of diverse learners in grades K?5 Learning Point Associates/North Central Regional Educational Laboratory

  • Buzan Tony. (2003). Hızlı okuma. (H. Güldü, Çev.). İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları.

  • Cartmill, E. A., Armstrong, B. F., Gleitman, L. R., Goldin-Meadow, S., Medina, T. N., & Trueswell, J. C. (2013). Quality of early parent input predicts child vocabulary 3 years later. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110 (28), 11278-11283.

  • Cesur, O. (2005). Pansiyonlu ilköğretim okulu öğrencileri üzerinde kelime serveti araştırması. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Bolu.

  • Çetinkaya, Ç. (2011). İlköğretim 4 ve 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin kelime kullanım sıklıkları üzerine bir araştırma. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.

  • Çıplak, M. (2005). Uşak Merkez İlköğretim 5., 8. ve 11. Sınıfların Yazılı Kelime Hazinesinin Belirlenmesi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Afyon.

  • Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen N.E., & Hyun, H.H. (2011). How to design and evaluate research in education (8'th Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Hayes, Blackledge ve Holmes (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-skinnerian account of human language and cognition. Edited by Hayes et al., Kluwer Academic Plenum Publishers, New York, 2001.

  • Hoff, E. (2003) The specificity of environmental influence: Socioeconomic status affects early vocabulary development via maternal speech. Child Development, 74(5), 1368-1378. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00612.

  • Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1991) Mother-child conversation in different social classes and communicative settings. Child Development. 62(4), 782-796. doi: 10.2307/1131177.

  • Hoffman, J. V., & Pearson, P. D. (2015). Teachers or programs? A historical perspective on where trust placed in teaching reading. In P. D. Pearson, & E. H. Hiebert (Eds), Research-based practices for teaching common core literacy, (pp.237-257). New York, NY: Teachers College Press

  • Hughes, G. (2000). A history of English words. Oxford, England: Blackwell.

  • Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104(1), 53-69.

  • İnce, H. G. (2007). İlköğretim 6. sınıf öğrencilerinin taşıdıkları sosyo-kültürel özellikler ile kelime hazinelerinin ilişkisi. III. Sosyal Bilimler Eğitimi Kongresi. (18-20 Haziran Adana).

  • İpekçi, A. (2005). İlköğretim yedinci sınıf öğrencilerinin kelime serveti üzerine bir araştırma. Yayımlanmamış

  • Johnston,P. H.(1984). Assessment in reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research. New York: Longman.

  • Kurudayıoğlu, M. (2005). İlköğretim II. kademe örgencilerinin kelime hazinesi üzerine bir araştırma.

  • Lodico, M.G., Spaulding, D. T., & Voegtle, K. H. (2006). Methods in educational research : From theory to practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Malvern, D. D., Richards, B. J., Chipere, N., & Durán, P. (2004). Lexical diversity and language development: Quantification and assessment. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Manzo, U. C., & Manzo, A. V. (2008). Teaching vocabulary-learnin strategies: Word consciousness, word connection, and word prediction. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds), What research has to say about vocabulary instruction, (pp, 80-105) Newark, DE: International Reading Instruction.

  • Nelson, J. R., & Stage, S. A. (2007). Fostering the development of vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension though contextually-based multiple meaning vocabulary instruction. Education and Treatment of Children 30(1), 1-22.

  • Perkins, P. G. (1982). Decoding skill and vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension, Florida: The University Press.

  • Temur, T. (2006). İlköğretim 4 ve 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin yazı dilindeki kelime hazinelerinin bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.

  • Tosunoğlu, M. (1999). Kelime servetinin eğitim öğretimdeki yeri ve önemi, Milli Eğitim, 144, 71-73.

  • Ünsal, H. (2005). Afyon (merkez) ilköğretim 5., 8. ve ortaöğretim 11. sınıf öğrencilerinin konuşma becerisinde geçen aktif kelimelerin tespiti. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. A.K.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Afyon.

  • White, T. G., Graves, M. F., & Slater, W. H. (1990). Growth of reading vocabulary in diverse elementary schools: Decoding and word meaning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (2), 281-290. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.2.281.

  • Yiğittürk, H. (2005). Ortaöğretim 9. sınıf öğrencilerinin kelime hazinesi üzerine bir araştırma. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek lisans tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics