An Analysis Of Candidate Teachers’ Scientific Epistemological Beliefs And Values

Author :  

Year-Number: 2017-Volume 9, Issue 1
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

he aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between the candidate teachers' epistemological beliefs and values. In addition, the analysis of the change of scientific epistemological beliefs and values depending on the situation of taking a course related to gender, department, type of instruction, and the nature of science is subgoals. The method of research is descriptive. Population is senior students in Amasya University, Faculty of Education in 2010-2011 academic years. The sample of the research consists of 199 women, 143 men a total of 342 candidate teachers who study in the Teaching Departments of Science, Mathematics, Primary School, Preschool, Social Sciences and Turkish. Data collection tool used in the research consists of demographic characteristics, Schwartz Value List and Scientific Epistemological Beliefs Scale., developed by Pomeroy. The statistical packaged software has been used in data analysis and descriptive statistics, Pearson Correlation Analysis, Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests have been applied. When candidate teachers' Scientific Epistemological Beliefs were examined, it has been found that the sample has a constructivist belief. In this study it was identified that there is no significant difference in their epistemological beliefs depending on the courses related to nature of the science they have taken, gender and type of education. SBE varies according to the departments of the candidate teachers. According to their study, epistemological beliefs change as a function of an academic field. When the value preferences of the sample were analyzed, it was seen that highest grades were received in the self-transcendence dimension. Then conservation can be mentioned. So candidate teachers are giving more importance to the values of universality and benevolence. According to the gender variant, significant differences were determined in candidate teachers' self-monitoring, universality, benevolence, and conformity and security value dimensions. According to the type of education it has been determined that there is no significant difference in the value preferences of candidate teachers. When value dimensions of candidate teachers are compared depending on their departments, only significant difference was determined in terms of adaptation and tradition. This difference is in favor of social areas. When the relationship between epistemological beliefs and values studied; a significant positive low level correlation has been identified between arousal, self-direction, universalism, benevolence and conformity dimensions and scientific epistemological beliefs.

Keywords

Abstract

he aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between the candidate teachers' epistemological beliefs and values. In addition, the analysis of the change of scientific epistemological beliefs and values depending on the situation of taking a course related to gender, department, type of instruction, and the nature of science is subgoals. The method of research is descriptive. Population is senior students in Amasya University, Faculty of Education in 2010-2011 academic years. The sample of the research consists of 199 women, 143 men a total of 342 candidate teachers who study in the Teaching Departments of Science, Mathematics, Primary School, Preschool, Social Sciences and Turkish. Data collection tool used in the research consists of demographic characteristics, Schwartz Value List and Scientific Epistemological Beliefs Scale., developed by Pomeroy. The statistical packaged software has been used in data analysis and descriptive statistics, Pearson Correlation Analysis, Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests have been applied. When candidate teachers' Scientific Epistemological Beliefs were examined, it has been found that the sample has a constructivist belief. In this study it was identified that there is no significant difference in their epistemological beliefs depending on the courses related to nature of the science they have taken, gender and type of education. SBE varies according to the departments of the candidate teachers. According to their study, epistemological beliefs change as a function of an academic field. When the value preferences of the sample were analyzed, it was seen that highest grades were received in the self-transcendence dimension. Then conservation can be mentioned. So candidate teachers are giving more importance to the values of universality and benevolence. According to the gender variant, significant differences were determined in candidate teachers' self-monitoring, universality, benevolence, and conformity and security value dimensions. According to the type of education it has been determined that there is no significant difference in the value preferences of candidate teachers. When value dimensions of candidate teachers are compared depending on their departments, only significant difference was determined in terms of adaptation and tradition. This difference is in favor of social areas. When the relationship between epistemological beliefs and values studied; a significant positive low level correlation has been identified between arousal, self-direction, universalism, benevolence and conformity dimensions and scientific epistemological beliefs.

Keywords


  • Arslan, M. ve Tunç, E. (2013). İlahiyat fakültesi öğrencilerinin değer yönelimlerindeki farklılaşmalar. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, 11 (26), 7-39.

  • Baç, M. (2011). Epistemoloji. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Açık Öğretim Yayınları.

  • Baloğlu, M. ve Balgalmış, E. (2005). İlköğretim ve ortaöğretim yöneticilerinin öz-değerlerinin betimlenmesi: Tokat ili örneği. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, 3 (10), 19-31.

  • Başçiftçi, F., Güleç, N., Akdoğan, T. ve Koç, Z. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının değer tercihleri ile epistemolojik inançlarının incelenmesi. 2nd International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 629-638.

  • Bernardo, A. B. I. (2008). Exploring epistemological beliefs of bilingual Filipino preservice teachers. The Journal of Psychology. 142 (2), 193-208. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.142.2.193-208

  • Biçer, B., Er, H., ve Özel, A. (2013). Öğretmen adaylarının epistemolojik inançları ve benimsedikleri eğitim felsefeleri arasındaki ilişki. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 9(3), 229-242.

  • Brownlee, J., Purdie, N., & Boulton-Lewis, G. (2001). Changing epistemological beliefs in pre-service teacher education students. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 247-268.

  • Brownlee, J. Tickle, E. L., & Nailon, D. (2004). Epistemological beliefs and transformational-transactional leadership behaviours of directors in child care centres. Educating: Weaving Research into Practice. 1, 153-166.

  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö.A., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

  • Cano, F. (2005). Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: Their change through secondary school and their influence on academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 203–221. doi:10.1348/000709904X22683

  • Cevizci, A. (2006). Felsefe ansiklopedisi. Cilt-4. Ankara: Babil Yayıncılık.

  • Chai, C. S., Khine, M. S., & Teo, T. (2006). Epistemological beliefs on teaching and learning: A survey among pre-service teachers in Singapore. Educational Media International, 43 (4), 285-298. doi: 10.1080/09523980600926242

  • Chan, K. (2003). Hong Kong teacher education students’ epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning. Research in Education, 69, 36-50.

  • Chan, K.W., & Elliott, R.G. (2002). Exploratory study of Hong Kong teacher education students’ epistemological beliefs: Cultural perspectives and implications on beliefs research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 392–414. doi: 10.1006/ceps.2001.1102

  • Chan, K.W., & Elliott, R.G. (2004.a). Relational analysis of personal epistemology and conceptions about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 817–831.

  • Chan, K. W., & Elliott, R. G. (2004.b). Epistemological belief across cultures: Critique and analysis of beliefs structure studies. Educational Psychology, 24 (2), 123-142.

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. London: Routhledge.

  • Çınar Altıntaş, F. (2006). Bireysel değerlerin örgütsel adalet ve sonuçları ilişkisinde yönlendirici etkisi: Akademik personel üzerinde bir analiz. İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 7 (2), 19-40.

  • De Backer, T.K., & Crowson, H.M. (2006). Influences on cognitive engagement: Epistemological beliefs and need for closure. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 535-551. doi: 10.1348/000709905X53138

  • Deniz, H. (2011). Searching for components of conceptual ecology that mediate development of epistemological beliefs ind science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 743–749

  • Deryakulu, D. (2004). Epistemolojik inançlar. Y. Kuzgun ve D. Deryakulu, (Eds.), Eğitimde bireysel farklılıklar (s. 261-289). Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.

  • Deryakulu, D. ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2005). Epistemolojik inanç ölçeğinin faktör yapısının yeniden incelenmesi: Cinsiyet ve öğrenim görülen program türüne göre epistemolojik inançların karşılaştırılması. Eğitim Araştırmaları, 18, 57-70.

  • Deryakulu, D. ve Hazır Bıkmaz, F. (2003). Bilimsel epistemolojik inançlar ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Eğitim Bilimleri ve Uygulama, 2 (4), 243-257.

  • Dickinson, D.J. (1990). The relation between ratings of teacher performance and student learning. Contemporary Educational Pschology, 15, 142-152. doi: 10.1016/0361-476X(90)90013-Q

  • Dönmez, B. ve Cömert, M. (2007). İlköğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin değer sistemleri. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, 5 (14), 29-59.

  • Enman, M., & Lupart, J. (2000). Talented female students’ resistance to science: An exploratory study of post- secondary achievement, motivation, persistence, and epistemological characteristics. High Ability Studies, 11 (2), 161-178. doi: 10.1080/13598130020001205

  • Erdem, M. (2008). Karma öğretmenlik uygulaması süreçlerinin öğretmen adaylarının öğretmenlik öz yeterlik ve epistemolojik inançlarına etkisi. Eğitim Araştırmaları, 30, 81-98.

  • Eroğlu, S. E., ve Güven, K. (2006). Üniversite öğrencilerinin epistemolojik inançlarının bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 16, 295-312.

  • Gözütok, D. (1995). Öğretmenlerin demokratik tutumları. Ankara: TDV Yayıncılık.

  • Güngör, E. (1998). Değerler psikolojisi üzerinde araştırmalar. İstanbul: Ötüken Neşriyat A.Ş.,.

  • Hofer, B.K. (1997). The development of personal epistemology: dimensions, disciplinary differences, and instructional practices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

  • Hofer, B.K. (2001) Personal epistemology research: Implications for learning and teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology Review, 13, 353–383.

  • Hofer, B.K. (2002). Personal epistemology as a psychological and educational construct: An Introduction. In B.K. Hofer & P.R. Pintrich (Eds.). Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 3-14). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Hofer, B.K. & Pintrich, P.R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67 (1), 88–140.

  • Izgar, H. ve Dilmaç, B. (2008). Yönetici adayı öğretmenlerin özyeterlik ve epistemolojik inançlarının incelenmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 20, 437-447.

  • Jehng, J.J., Johnson, S.D., & Anderson, R.C. (1993). Schooling and students’ epistemological beliefs about learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18 (1), 23-35. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1993.1004

  • Kulaksızoğlu, A. ve Dilmaç, B. (2000). İnsani değerler eğitim programı. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 12, 199–208.

  • Kuşdil, M.E. ve Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2000). Türk öğretmenlerin değerler yönelimi ve Schwartz değer kuramı. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 15 (45), 59-76.

  • Mehmedoğlu, A.U. (2006). İlahiyat fakültesi öğrencilerinin değer yönelimleri ve dindarlık-değer ilişkisi (M.Ü. İlahiyat Fakültesi örneği) M.Ü. İlâhiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 30 (1), 133-167.

  • Meral, M. ve Çolak, E. (2009). Öğretmen adaylarının bilimsel epistemolojik inançlarının incelenmesi. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27, 129-146.

  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB). (2013). İlköğretim fen ve teknoloji dersi (4 ve 5. Sınıflar) öğretim programı. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.

  • Neber, H., & Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). Self-regulated science learning with highly gifted students: The role of cognitive, motivational, epistemological, and environmental variables. Higher Ability Studies, 13 (1), 59-74. doi: 10.1080/13598130220132316

  • Oğuz, A. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının demokratik değerleri ile öğretme-öğrenme anlayışları, Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, 9 (22), 139-160.

  • Özlem, D. (2002). Bilgi ve değer sempozyumu bildirileri Ş. Yalçın, (Ed.), Değerler sorununda nesnelcilik/mutlakçılık ve öznelcilik/rölativizm tartışması üzerine. (s. 282-312). Ankara: Vadi Yayınları.

  • Paul, R. & Elder, L. (2001). Critical thinking - tools for taking charge of your learning and your life. New Jersey: Prentice Hall

  • Pascual, A. Z. (2009). The work values of teacher training students in a Spanish university. Symbiosis between Schwartz and meaning of work (MOW) study group. European Journal of Education, 44 (3), 441-453. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3435.2009.01395.x

  • Paulsen, M.B. & Wells, C.T. (1998). Domain differences in the epistemological beliefs of college students. Research in Higher Education, 39(4), 365–384.

  • Pomeroy, D. (1993). Implications of teachers’ beliefs about the nature of science: Comparison of the beliefs of scientists, secondary science teachers, and elementary teachers. Science Education, 77 (3), 261-278. doi:10.1002/sce.3730770302

  • Sarı, E. (2005). Öğretmen adaylarının değer tercihleri: Giresun eğitim fakültesi örneği. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, 3(10), 73-88.

  • Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498–504. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.498

  • Schommer, M. (1993). Epistemological development and academic performance among secondary students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 406-411.

  • Schommer, M. (1994). Synthesizing epistemological belief research: Tentative understandings and provocative confusions. Educational Psychology Review, 6(4), 293-319.

  • Schommer, M. (1998). The influence of age and schooling on epistemological beliefs. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 551–562.doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1998.tb01311.x

  • Schommer, M., Crouse, A. & Rhodes, N. (1992). Epistemological beliefs and mathematical text comprehension: Believing it is simple does not make it so. Journal of Educational Psychology. 84 (4) 435443.

  • Schommer, M. & Walker, K. (1997). Epistemological beliefs and valuing school: considerations for college admissions and retention. Research In Higher Education, 38 (2), 173-86.

  • Schwartz, S.H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and emprical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna, (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1-65), Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

  • Schwartz, H.S. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19-45.

  • Schwartz, S.H. & Boehnke, K. (2004). Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 230–255. doi: 10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00069-2

  • Sinatra, G.M., & Kardash, C.M. (2004). Teacher candidates’ epistemological beliefs, dispositions, and views on teaching as persuasion. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 483–498. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.03.001

  • Sönmez, V. (2005). Eğitim felsefesi. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.

  • Şahin Fırat, N. ve Açıkgöz, K. (2012). Bazı değişkenler açısından öğretmenlerin değer sistemleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 43, 422-435.

  • Terzi, A (2005). Üniversite öğrencilerinin bilimsel epistemolojik inançları üzerine bir araştırma. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(2), 298-311.

  • Tolhurst, D. (2007). The influence of learning environments on students’ epistemological beliefs and learning outcomes. Teaching in Higher Education, 12 (2), 219-233. doi: 10.1080/13562510701191992

  • Topçu, M.S. ve Aslan, M. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının epistemolojik inançları ve değerleri arasındaki ilişki. Değerler Eğitimi Sempozyumu, 26-28 Ekim, Eskişehir.

  • Tümkaya, S. (2012). Üniversite öğrencilerinin epistemolojik inançlarının cinsiyet, sınıf, eğitim alanı, akademik başarı öğrenme stillerine göre incelenmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 12 (1), 7595.

  • Yapıcı, A. ve Zengin, S. Z. (2003). İlâhiyat fakültesi öğrencilerinin değer tercih sıralamaları üzerine psikolojik bir araştırma: Çukurova Üniversitesi İlâhiyat Fakültesi örneği. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, 1 (4),173-206.

  • Yılmaz, E. (2009). Öğretmenlerin değer tercihlerinin bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, 7 (17), 109-128.

  • Yılmaz Tüzün, Ö. ve Topçu, S. (2008). Relationships among preservice science teachers’ epistemological beliefs, epistemological world views, and self-efficacy beliefs, International Journal of Science Education, 30 (1), 65–85. doi: 10.1080/09500690601185113

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics