Investigating Educational Research Articles (1980-2014) in terms of Bibliometric Indicators

Author :  

Year-Number: 2017-Volume 9, Issue 1
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

Research in the field of education is growing more rapidly than ever before. However, the educational research literature still lacks an actual comprehensive view for current status of educational research. The aim of this survey study, in which data mining has been used, is to find out bibliometric analysis results related to educational research covering WOS articles between 1980 and 2014 (156.689 articles) in order to gain a comprehensive point of view about the current status of educational research in the world. Results of the study point out which subjects come into prominence, which countries have the most contribution to educational research, which publications have the most impact, which journals are the top in educational research.

Keywords

Abstract

Research in the field of education is growing more rapidly than ever before. However, the educational research literature still lacks an actual comprehensive view for current status of educational research. The aim of this survey study, in which data mining has been used, is to find out bibliometric analysis results related to educational research covering WOS articles between 1980 and 2014 (156.689 articles) in order to gain a comprehensive point of view about the current status of educational research in the world. Results of the study point out which subjects come into prominence, which countries have the most contribution to educational research, which publications have the most impact, which journals are the top in educational research.

Keywords


  • Abramo, G., Cicero, T., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2012). The dispersion of research performance within and between universities as a potential indicator of the competitive intensity in higher education systems. Journal of Informetrics, 6(2), 155–168. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2011.11.007.

  • Al, U., Soydal, İ., & Yalçın, H. (2010). Bibliyometrik özellikleri açısından bilig’in değerlendirilmesi. Bilig, 55, 1– 20.

  • Andrés, A. (2009). Measuring academic research: How to undertake a bibliometric study. Elsevier.

  • Anninos, L. N. (2014). Research performance evaluation: some critical thoughts on standard bibliometric indicators. Studies in Higher Education, 39(9), 1542–1561. doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.801429.

  • Bauer, J., Leydesdorff, L., & Bornmann, L. (2015). Highly cited papers in Library and Information Science (LIS): Authors, institutions, and network structures. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(12), 3095-3100. doi:10.1002/asi.23568.

  • Bates, R. (2003). Phelan’s bibliometric analysis of the impact of Australian educational research. The Australian Educational Researcher, 30(2), 57-64. doi:10.1007/BF03216790.

  • Bornmann, L., Wagner, C., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). BRICS countries and scientific excellence: A bibliometric analysis of most frequently cited papers. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1507–1513. doi:10.1002/asi.23333.

  • Budd, J. M., & Magnuson, L. (2010). Higher education literature revisited: citation patterns examined. Research in Higher Education, 51(3), 294–304. doi:10.1007/s11162-009-9155-6.

  • Cvetanovich, G. L., Fillingham, Y. A., Harris, J. D., Erickson, B. J., Verma, N. N., & Bach, B. R. (2015). Publication and level of evidence trends in the american journal of sports medicine from 1996 to 2011. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 43(1), 220–225. doi:10.1177/0363546514528790.

  • Davarpanah, M. R. (2009). The international publication productivity of Malaysia in social sciences: developing a scientific power index. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 41(1), 67–91. doi:10.3138/jsp.41.1.67.

  • Dees, W. (2008). Innovative scientometric methods for a continuous monitoring of research activities in educational science. In H. Kretschmer & F. Havemann (Eds.), Fourth International conference on webometrics, informetrics and scientometrics & ninth COLLNET Meeting (pp. 1–10). Berlin.

  • Diem, A., & Wolter, S. C. (2013). The use of bibliometrics to measure research performance in education sciences. Research in Higher Education, 54(1), 86–114. doi:10.1007/s11162-012-9264-5.

  • Earp, V. J. (2010). A bibliometric snapshot of the journal of higher education and its impact on the field. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 29(4), 283–295. doi:10.1080/01639269.2010.521034.

  • Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. (2014). How to design and evaluate research in education. NewYork: McGraw-Hill.

  • Glänzel, W. (2003). Bibliometrics as a research field. A course on theory and application of bibliometric indicators. (Course Handouts). Retrieved on January 15, 2016, from http://nsdl.niscair.res.in/jspui/bitstream/ 123456789/968/1/Bib_Module_KUL.pdf.

  • Gu, Y. (2004). Global knowledge management research: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 61(2), 171–190. doi:10.1023/B:SCIE.0000041647.01086.f4.

  • Gülgöz, S., Yedekçioglu, Ö. A., & Yurtsever, E. (2002). Turkey’s output in social science publications: 1970- 1999. Scientometrics, 55(1), 103–121. doi:10.1023/A:1016055121274.

  • Gogolin, I., Åström, F., & Hansen, A. (2014). Approaches on assessing quality in European educational research introduction to the volume. In I. Gogolin, F. Åström, & A. Hansen (Eds.), Assessing quality in European educational research: Indicators and approaches (pp. 15-21). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-05969-9_1.Heatmap (2016). Heat map. Available online at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_map (accessed 6 January 2016).

  • Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41(2), 251–261. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007.

  • Hong, Y., Yao, Q., Yang, Y., Feng, J.-j., Wu, S.-d., Ji, W.-x., & Liu, Z.-y. (2016). Knowledge structure and theme trends analysis on general practitioner research: A Co-word perspective. BMC family practice, 17(1), 115. doi:10.1186/s12875-016-0403-5.

  • Jacob, J., & Lamari, M. (2012). Factors influencing research performance in higher education: an empirical investigation. Foresight-Russia, 6(3), 40–49. Retrieved on January 15, 2016, from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hig/fsight/v6y2012i3p40-49.html

  • Larose, D. T. (2014). Discovering knowledge in data: an introduction to data mining. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Liu, W., Hu, G., Tang, L., & Wang, Y. (2015). China’s global growth in social science research: Uncovering evidence from bibliometric analyses of SSCI publications (1978–2013). Journal of Informetrics, 9(3), 555– 569. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2015.05.007.

  • Milesi, C., Brown, K. L., Hawkley, L., Dropkin, E., & Schneider, B. L. (2014). Charting the impact of federal spending for education research: a bibliometric approach. Educational Researcher, 43(7), 361–370. doi:10.3102/0013189X14554002.

  • Mishra, V. K. (2015). Relevance of bibliometric study in ranking/performance of the institutes: A case study. In 10th International CALIBER-2015 HP University and IIAS, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh (pp. 192–197). India. Retrieved on January 15, 2016 from http://ir.inflibnet.ac.in/handle/1944/1858.

  • Pendlebury, D. A. (2012). Bibliometrics, research performance evaluation, and beyond: Towards actionable intelligence for science administrators, policymakers, and funders. Retrieved on January 15, 2016, from http://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=etra.

  • Phelan, T. J., Anderson, D. S., & Bourke, P. (2000). Educational research in Australia : A bibliometric analysis.. In: The Impact of Educational Research. Canberra: DETYA, 573–671.

  • Pritchard, A. (1969) Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25, 348-349.

  • Sedighi, M. (2016). Application of word co-occurrence analysis method in mapping of the scientific fields (case study: the field of Informetrics). Library Review, 65(1/2), 52–64. doi:10.1108/LR-07-2015-0075.

  • van Aalst, J. (2010). Using google scholar to estimate the impact of journal articles in education. Educational Researcher, 39(5), 387–400. doi:10.3102/0013189X10371120.

  • van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2016). VOS viewer. The Netherlands: Centre for science and technology studies, Leiden University. Retrieved on February 19, 2016, from http://www.vosviewer.com/.

  • Xu, F., Liu, W., & Rousseau, R. (2015). Introducing sub-impact factor (SIF-) sequences and an aggregated SIF- indicator for journal ranking. Scientometrics, 102(2), 1577–1593. doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1401-9.

  • Yalçın, H. (2010). Milli Folklor dergisinin bibliyometrik profili (2007-2009). Milli Folklor, 22(85), 205–211.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics