The Role of Drama in Raising Environmental Awareness in Preservice Science Teachers

Author :  

Year-Number: 2017-Volume 9, Issue 4
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of drama activities on the environmental knowledge, attitude, and behaviors of preservice science teachers to be observed at the end of the drama activities within the framework of determined environmental issues. This is a pretest-posttest control group-designed study. The study was conducted with a total of 67 preservice teachers of which 33 (9 males, 24 females) constituted the experimental group and 34 (13 males, 21 females) constituted the control group. The participants studies in the Science Teaching Program of Primary Education Department in Gazi University’s Gazi Education Faculty. To determine the environmental awareness of preservice teachers, the study created an Environmental Awareness Scale (EAS) which was composed of three different tests: Environmental Awareness Knowledge Test (EAKT), Environmental Awareness Attitude Test (EAAT), and Environmental Awareness Behavior Test (EABT). In the study, EAS was applied to the participants both as a pretest and a posttest. The results revealed that the drama method has a positive effect on the preservice teachers’ environmental awareness. When the two groups were compared, it was found that there was a significant difference to the advantage of the experimental regarding the knowledge and behavior scores. However, the difference between the attitudes was not significant. In the light of the results, some suggestions were stated at the end of the study.

Keywords

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of drama activities on the environmental knowledge, attitude, and behaviors of preservice science teachers to be observed at the end of the drama activities within the framework of determined environmental issues. This is a pretest-posttest control group-designed study. The study was conducted with a total of 67 preservice teachers of which 33 (9 males, 24 females) constituted the experimental group and 34 (13 males, 21 females) constituted the control group. The participants studies in the Science Teaching Program of Primary Education Department in Gazi University’s Gazi Education Faculty. To determine the environmental awareness of preservice teachers, the study created an Environmental Awareness Scale (EAS) which was composed of three different tests: Environmental Awareness Knowledge Test (EAKT), Environmental Awareness Attitude Test (EAAT), and Environmental Awareness Behavior Test (EABT). In the study, EAS was applied to the participants both as a pretest and a posttest. The results revealed that the drama method has a positive effect on the preservice teachers’ environmental awareness. When the two groups were compared, it was found that there was a significant difference to the advantage of the experimental regarding the knowledge and behavior scores. However, the difference between the attitudes was not significant. In the light of the results, some suggestions were stated at the end of the study.

Keywords


  • Ajiboye, J. O. & Ajitoni, S. O. (2008). Effects of full and quasi – participatory learning strategies on Nigerian senior secondary students’ environmental knowledge: Implications for classroom practice. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 3(2), 58-66.

  • Ajiboye, J. O. & Silo, N. (2008). Enhancing Botswana children’s environmental knowledge, attitudes and practices through the school civic clubs. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 3(3), 105-114.

  • Ayvaz, Z. (1998). Çevre eğitimi: Metot ve özel konular. İzmir: ÇEV-KOR Çevre Eğitimi Merkezi Yayınları: 2. Onur Ofset.

  • Bailey, S. (1994). The Ecogame. Risley, Warrington, Cheshire: BNFL Education Unit.

  • Bailey, S. & Watson, R. (1998). Establishing basic ecological understanding in younger pupils: a pilot evaluation of a strategy based on drama/ role play. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 139152.

  • Ballantyne, R. & Packer, J. (2009). Introducing a fifth pedagogy: experience-based strategies forfacilitating learning in natural environments. Environmental Education Research, 15(2), 243-262. doi:10.1080/13504620802711282

  • Başal, H. A. (2005). Çocuklarda çevre bilinci ve duyarlılığının geliştirilmesi. I. Ulusal Erciyes Sempozyumu, 23-25 Ekim 2003, Kayseri.

  • Bertiz, H. (2010a). Dramanın çevre bilinci oluşturmadaki rolü ve etkililiği. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.

  • Bertiz, H., Bahar, M., & Yeğen, G. (2010b). Fen ve teknoloji öğretmen adaylarının yaratıcı drama yöntemine yönelik tutumları ve yöntemin fen ve teknoloji eğitiminde kullanılabilirliğine ilişkin görüşleri. GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 30(2), 1-16.

  • Bertiz, H. (2011). İlköğretim okullarında yaratıcı drama yönteminin kullanılması ve yaygınlaşması sürecinde karşılaşılan engeller ve sorunların müfettişlerin görüşleri ile belirlenmesi. Ç.Ü., Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 40(3), 34-56.

  • Bertiz, H. (2014). Çevre eğitiminde drama: çevre bilinci oluşturmada etkili bir süreç ve yöntem olarak drama. İ. Günaydın, T. Özsoy (Ed.). Disiplinler arası bakış açısı ile çevre. (s. 21-41). İstanbul: Hiperlink Yayınları.

  • Bertiz, H. (2015). Fen bilimleri öğretimi ve drama. T. Erdoğan (Ed.). Okul öncesinden ilköğretime kuramdan uygulamaya drama. (s. 295-341). Ankara: Eğiten Kitap.

  • Bozkurt, O. & Cansüngü, K. Ö. (2002). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin çevre eğitiminde sera etkisi ile ilgili kavram yanılgıları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23, 72.

  • Brunetti, A. J., Petrell, R. J., & Sawada, B. (2003). SEEDing sustainability: Team project ‐based learning enhances awareness of sustainability at the University of British Columbia, Canada. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 4(3), 210-217. doi:10.1108/14676370310485401

  • Bülbül, Y. (2007). Ortaöğretim çevre ve insan dersinde işbirlikli öğrenme yönteminin çevreye yönelik tutumlara ve erişiye etkisi. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Çanakkale.

  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2003). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.

  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2005). Research method in education. London and New York: Routledge Falmer.

  • Erdoğan, G. (2007). Çevre eğitiminde küresel ısınma konusunun öğrenilmesinde proje tabanlı öğrenmenin etkisi. Yayımlanmamış yüksel lisans tezi. Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Zonguldak.

  • Erten, S. (2000). Empirische Untersuchungen zu Bedingungen der Umwelterziehung: ein interkultureller Vergleich auf der Grundlage der Theorie des geplanten Verhaltens. Tectum Verlag DE.

  • Erten, S. (2003). 5. sınıf öğrencilerinde ‘çöplerin azaltılması’ bilincinin kazandırılmasına yönelik bir öğretim modeli. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25, 94-103.

  • Erten, S. (2004). Çevre eğitimi ve çevre bilinci nedir, çevre eğitimi nasıl olmalıdır? Çevre ve İnsan Dergisi, 65/66. 2006/25.

  • Erten, S. (2005). Okul öncesi öğretmen adaylarında çevre dostu davranışların araştırılması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28, 91-100.

  • Gough, S. (2002). Right answers or wrong problems? Towards a theory of change for environmental learning. The Trumpeter: Journal of Ecosophy. Retrieved on October 11, 2006 from http://trumpeter.athabascau.ca/content/v18.1/gough.html

  • Görümlü, T. (2003). Liselerde çevreye karşı duyarlılığın oluşturulmasında çevre eğitiminin önemi eğitimi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.

  • Gruenewald, D. (2005). The best of both worlds: A pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 3-12.

  • Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1986/7). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behaviour: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1-8.

  • Hungerford, H. R. & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing learner behaviour through environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8-21.

  • Hungerford, H. R., Bluhm, W. J., Volk, T. L., & Ramsey, J. M. (Eds.). (2001). Essential readings in environmental education. Champaign, IL: Stipes Publishing L.L.C.

  • Krech, D. & Crutchfield, R. S. (1980). Sosyal psikoloji. (E. Güngör, Çev.), İstanbul: Ötüken Yayınları.

  • Kruse, C. K. & Card, J. A. (2004). Effect of a conservation education camp program on campers’ self-reported knowledge, attitude, and behaviour. The Journal of Environmental Education, 35(4), 33-45. doi:10.3200/JOEE.35.4.33-45

  • Levey, S. (2005). Drama in environmental education. Green Teacher, 77, 15.

  • Littledyke, M. (1994a). Employment versus environment. The people that time forgot, in: Projects for science and technology with drama. London: Watts and Questions Publishing Company.

  • Littledyke, M. (1994b). The health show. Questions, 7(2).

  • Littledyke, M., Oldroyd, J., & Robertson, J. (1997). The impact of primary science teaching on children’s attitudes to and understanding of health and environmental issues, Teacher Training Agency Research Project (Cheltenham, Cheltenham and Gloucester College of Higher Education).

  • Littledyke, M. (1998). Live issues: drama strategies for personal social and moral education. Birmingham: Questions Publishing Company.

  • McNaughton, M. J. (2004). Educational drama in the teaching of education for sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 10(2), 139-155. doi:10.1080/13504620242000198140

  • Mertens, M. D. (2005). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Monroe, M. C., Jeanette, R., & Vicki, C. (2001). Improving student achievement with environmental education, University of Florida, Cooperative Extencion Service, Institute of Food and Agriculturel Sciences, Retrived from http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.

  • Morgil, İ., Yavuz, S., & Oskay, Ö. Ö. (2006). The effects of project-based learning applications on environmental awareness and knowledge. Energy Education Science and Technology, 16(1), 9-19.

  • Nunnally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill Series in Psychology, McGraw-Hill, Inc.

  • Orr, D. (1991). What is education for? Trumpeter, 8(3), 91-102.

  • Orr, D. (1999). Rethinking education. The Ecologist, 29(3), 232-234.

  • Oskamp, S. (2002). Environmentally responsible behaviour: Teaching and promoting it effectively. Analysis of Social Issues and Public Policy, 9(1), 173-182. doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2002.00036.x

  • Palmer, J. & Neal, P. (1996). The handbook of environmental education. London: Routledge.

  • Peyton, R. B. & Miller, B. A. (1980). Developing an internal locus of control as a prerequisite to environmental action taking. In Current issues VI: The year book of environmental education and environmental studies, ed. A.B. Sacks, 173-92. Columbus Ohio: Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education.

  • Robinson, J. & Shallcross, T. (1996) Towards a holistic model of inservice education for sustainable living. In W. Leal Fihlo, C. Dykes and Z. Murphy (Ed.) Raising awareness on biodiversity: commonwealth examples Vancouver: Commonwealth of Learning and European Research and Training Centre on Environmental Education.

  • Robelia, B. A. (2008). Investigating the impact of adding an environmental focus to a developmental chemistry class. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Minnesota, USA.

  • Roberts, N. S. (2009). Impacts of the national green corps program (Eco-Clubs) on students in India and their participation in environmental education activities. Environmental Education Research, 15(4), 443-464. doi:10.1080/13504620902994127

  • Sherif, M. & Sherif, C. W. (1996). Sosyal psikolojiye giriş II. (M. Atakay ve A. Yılmaz, Çev.), İstanbul: Sosyal Yayınlar.

  • Sobel, D. (2004). Place-based education: Connecting classrooms & communities. Great Barrington, MA: The Orion Society.

  • Şahin, N. F., Cerrah, L., Saka, A., & Şahin, B. (2004). Yüksek öğretimde öğrenci merkezli çevre eğitimi dersine yönelik bir uygulama. GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(3), 113-128.

  • Tilbury, D. (1994). The critical learning years for environmental education. In R. A. Wilson (Ed.). Environmental education at the early childhood level. (pp. 11-13). Washington, DC: North American Association for

  • Türküm, S. (2006). Çağdaş toplumda çevre sorunları ve çevre bilinci. 12.03. 2016 tarihinde http://www.aof.edu.tr/kitap/IOLTP/1268/unite10.pdf adresinden erişilmiştir.

  • Uzun, N. (2009). The effect of the green class model on environmental knowledge and its retention. Asia- Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 1.

  • Vargas, G. (1995). Econauts: Mission Nature. Radio drama for environmental education in Cost Rica. Learn Tech Case Study Series, 5.

  • Yavuz, S. (2006). Proje tabanlı öğrenme modelinin kimya eğitimi öğrencilerinin çevre bilgisi ve çevreye karşı tutumlarına olan etkisinin değerlendirilmesi. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.

  • Yavetz, B., Goldman, D., & Pe’er, S. (2009). Environmental literacy of pre-service teachers in Israel: a comparison between students at the onset and end of their studies. Environmental Education Research, 15(4), 393-415. doi:10.1080/13504620902928422

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics