Higher Education Administrators’ Managerial Competency

Author :  

Year-Number: 2017-Volume 9, Issue 4
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study is to identify higher education administrators’ competencies in interpersonal, informational and decisional roles. Based on qualitative methodology, the reseracher interviewed 40 administrators (rectors, vice-rectors, deans, vice-deans, department, heads, directors and vice-director). Results indicate that while experienced administrators use their charisma and human relations, inxperienced ones prefer using legal power. Regarding decision-making, most of them are authoratian while some are delegators and few are supervisors. Finally, as far as administrators’ informational roles are concerned, although they are aware of the importance of the information age, a few administrators have competency in this role. It can be concluded that university administration is not considered a professional career in Turkey and they do not have adequate managerial competency. It is recommended that higher education administration should be accepted as a professional career and administrators should be selected among those who have managerial competency.

Keywords

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study is to identify higher education administrators’ competencies in interpersonal, informational and decisional roles. Based on qualitative methodology, the reseracher interviewed 40 administrators (rectors, vice-rectors, deans, vice-deans, department, heads, directors and vice-director). Results indicate that while experienced administrators use their charisma and human relations, inxperienced ones prefer using legal power. Regarding decision-making, most of them are authoratian while some are delegators and few are supervisors. Finally, as far as administrators’ informational roles are concerned, although they are aware of the importance of the information age, a few administrators have competency in this role. It can be concluded that university administration is not considered a professional career in Turkey and they do not have adequate managerial competency. It is recommended that higher education administration should be accepted as a professional career and administrators should be selected among those who have managerial competency.

Keywords


  • Amey, M. J. (2006). Leadership in higher education. Change: the Magazine of Higher Learning, 38, 6, 55-58.

  • Altbach, P.G. (1996) Patterns in higher education development. Towards the year 2000. In Z. Morsy & P.G. Altbach (Eds.), Higher education in an international perspective (pp. 21-35). Geneva, Switzerland: International Bureau of Education.

  • Anyamele, S. C. (2004). Institutional management in higher education: A study of leadership approaches to quality improvement in university management-Nigerian and Finnish Cases, Helsinki: University of Helsinki Department of Education Research Report, No: 195.

  • Askling, B., & Kristensen, O. (2000). Towards the learning organization: Implication for institutional governance and leadership. Higher Education Management, 12(2), 17-41.

  • Balcı, A. (1988). Training educational administrators: Research about elementary and secondary school administrators in Turkey. Ankara: Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences.

  • Bailey, K.D. (1994). Methods of social research. New York: The Free Press.

  • Bargh, C., Bocock, J., & Smith, D. (2000). University leadership: The role of the chief executive. Buckingham and Philadelphia: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

  • Bayenet, B., Feola, C., & Tavernier, M. (2000). Strategic management of universities: evaluation policy and policy evaluation. Higher Education Management, 12(2), 65-72.

  • Bentoa, Y. (2000). An analysis of innovation in Chinese higher education adaptable to the environment. In OECD Current Issues in Chinese Higher Education. Paris: OECD.

  • Black, S. A. (2015). Qualities of effective leadership in higher education. Open Journal of Leadership, 4, 54-66. doi:10.4236/ojl.2015.42006

  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

  • Botha, L., & Camphor, F. (2008). Proposal for the development and phased implementation of a UP-specific management and development programme. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.

  • Brennen, J., & Shah, T. (2000). Managing quality in higher education: An international perspective on institutional assessment and change. Buckingham and Philadelphia: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

  • Bryman, A. (2007). Effective leadership in higher education: a literature review. Studies in Higher Education, 32(6), 693-710.

  • Cheryl, C. (2010) Managerial leadership competencies of heads of departments: a case study of higher educational institutions in Kerala, India. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Southern Queensland, USA.

  • Cisneros-Cohernour, E. J., Bustillos, M. E. B., & Riveroll, Á. M. A. (2014). Determining the competences and professional development needs of educational administrators in the Southeast of Mexico, Journal of Modern Education Review, 4(7), 519–526, doi: 10.15341/jmer(2155-7993)/07.04.2014/004

  • Clark, B.R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Oxford, New York: Pergamon Press.

  • Conover, K. S. (2009). Leadership competencies of branch campus administrators in multi-campus community college systems, Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Paper 10697.

  • Creswell, J. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.

  • Crosthwaite, C., & Erwee, R. (2014). Managerial leadership competencies of heads of department in higher education institutions in Kerala, India. Fourth Annual International Conference on Engaged Management Scholarship, September 2014.

  • Dahlgaard, J. J., Larsen, H. Z., & Norgaard, A. (1997). Leadership profiles in quality management: A Danish perspective. Total Quality Management, 8(2-3), 16–30.

  • Davis, J. L. (1997a). A European agenda for change for higher education in the xx1st century, European Regional Forum, 24–27 September, Palermo.

  • Dauphin, B. (2005). Letter on competency for psychologists. The Michigan Society for Psychoanalytic Psychology, 15(2), 100-123.

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Dill, D. D. 1999. Academic accountability and university adaptation: The architecture of an academic learning organization. In Higher Education, 38, 127–154.

  • Drew, G. (2006). Balancing academic advancement with business effectiveness? International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management, 6(4), 117-125.

  • Eisemon, T. O., & Kouroma, M. (1994). Foreign assistance for university development in Sub Saharan Africa and Asia. In Jamil Salmi and Adriaan M. Verspoor (Eds.,), Revitalizing Higher Education. Oxford, New

  • Firestone, W. A. (1996). Leadership: Roles or functions? In K. Leithwood, J. Chapman, D. Corson, P. Hallinger & A. Hart (Eds.,), International handbook of educational leadership and administration. Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Freeman, S. & Kochan, F.K. (2012). Academic pathways to university leadership: Presidents’ descriptions of their doctoral education, International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 53-124.

  • Gedikoğlu, T. (2012). Yükseköğretimde hesap verebilirlik, Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 2(3):142-150, doi:10.2399/yod.12.019.

  • Gentry, W. A., Harris,L.S., Baker, B.A., & Leslie,J.B. (2008). Managerial skills: what has changed since the late 1980s, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 29(2), 167-181, doi:10.1108/01437730810852506

  • Glaser, B.G. (1992). Theoretical sensitivity: advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, Ca: Sociology Press.

  • Gonzalez, E.M. G. (2004). Perceptions of selected senior administrators of higher education institutions in Mexico regarding needed administrative competencies. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University.

  • Hamlin, R. G., & Patel, T. (2017). Perceived managerial and leadership effectiveness within higher education in France, Studies in Higher Education, 42(2), 292-314.

  • Harrison, R. (20099. Learning and development. 5th edition. London: CIPD.

  • Hempsall, K. (2014). Developing Leadership in Higher Education: Perspectives from the USA, the UK and Australia. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 36(4): 383–394. doi: 10.1080/1360080X.2014.916468.

  • Junga, J., & Shin, J. C. (2015). Administrative staff members’ job competency and their job satisfaction in a Korean research university, Studies in Higher Education, 40(5,), 881–901, doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.865161

  • Kekäle, J. (1997). Leadership culture in academic departments. Joensuu: University of Joensuu Publications in Social Sciences.

  • Knoeppel, R. C., & Rinehart, J. S. (2010). A canonical analysis of successful and unsuccessful high schools: Accommodating multiple sources of achievement data in school leadership. Educational Considerations, 38, 1, 24-32.

  • Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2007). The leadership challenge. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

  • Kouzes, J.M., & Posner, B. Z. (2003). Academic administrator’s guide to exemplary leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

  • Krüger, M. (2009). The big five of school leadership competences in the Netherlands. School Leadership & Management, 29(2), 109-127.

  • Kuzu, Ö.H. (2013). Yükseköğretimde değişen değerler bağlamında Avrupa yükseköğretim alanı yeterlilik düzeyi algısı: Öğretim elemanları üzerine bir uygulama, Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Konya.

  • Lazarenko, V. A., & Nikishina,V. B.(2014). Competence-based assessment model of inter-departmental interaction efficiency within higher educational institution. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences, 5(4), 16-49.

  • Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research (4thed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis, forum: Online Journal Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), 1-10.

  • Meek, V. L., Goedegebuure, L., Santiago, R., & Carvalho, T. (2010). Discusses the most relevant trends in

  • Meyer, H. D. (2014). The crisis of dual governance ın higher education and the possibility of a new reapprochement: Insights from organization theory, Telescope, 20(2), 156-169.

  • Miles, M.B., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. 2. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row.

  • Murphy, J. (2002). The educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century. Chicago: NSSE

  • OECD. (2009). Higher education to 2030, Volume 2. Globalization, Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. ISBN 978-92-64-07537-5.

  • Ogawa, R. T., & Bossert, S. T. (1997). Leadership as an organization quality. In M. Crawford, L. Kydd & C. Riches (Eds.,), Leadership and teams in educational management. (pp.9-23). Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.

  • Porter, J. A., (2003). The relationship between competencies perceived to be important for administrative effectiveness and the higher education administration doctoral program of study: A needs assessment. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Educational Leadership Department College of Education and Human Services.

  • Potgieter, I.L., & Coetzee, M. (2010). Management competencies in higher education: Perceived job importance in relation to level of training required. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 8(1), 306- 316.

  • Potgieter, I.L., Basson,J., & Coetzee, M. (2011). Management competencies for the development of heads of department in the higher education context: a literature overview, South African Journal of Labour Relations, 35(12), 81-103.

  • Rowley, J. (1997). Academic leaders: made or born? Industrial and Commercial Training, 29(3), doi:10.1108/00197859710165065

  • Rudzki, R. E. G. (1995). The application of strategic management model to the internationalization of higher education. Higher Education, 29, 421–441.

  • Shahmandi, E., Silong, A.D., Ismail, İ.A., Abu Samah, B. B., & Othman, J. (2011). Competencies, roles and effective academic leadership in world class university, International Journal of Business Administration,

  • Salmi, J. (1994). Conclusion: higher education reform in perspective. In J. Salmi & A. M.Verspoor (Eds.,), Revitalizing higher education (pp.14-40), Oxford: Pergamon Press.

  • Scott, G., Coates, H., & Anderson. M. (2008). Academic leadership capabilities for Australian higher education, University of Western Sydney and Australian Council for Educational Research.

  • Shattock, M. (2003). Managing successful universities. Berkshire: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

  • Skorková, Z. (2016). Competency models in public sector, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 230(2016) 226-234.

  • Smith, D. M. (2000). Leadership and professional competencies: Serving higher education in an era of change, Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Pennsylvania.

  • Smith, Z. A., & Wolverton, M. (2010). Higher education leadership competencies: quantitatively refining a qualitative model, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 17(1), 61–70.

  • Sousa, D. A. (2003). The leadership brain: How to lead today's schools more effectively. Thousand Oaks CA:Corwin Press.

  • Spendlove, M. (2007). Competencies for effective leadership in higher education, International Journal of Educational Management, 21 (5), 407 – 417.

  • Kerkhof, Van de M. (2009). Repertory grid technique (RGT), Retrieved from http://www.ivm.vu.nl/en/Images/PT4_tcm53-161509.pdf on 27.10.2017 at 15:00.

  • Vesi, H. (2010). Organizational learning in the higher education ınstitutions (A case study of agricultural and natural recourses campus of university of Tehran), International Online Journal of Educational Sciences,

  • Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2006). What is changing in academic research? Trends and futures scenarios. European Journal of Education, 41(2), 169–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3435.2006.00255.

  • Vuori, J. (2014). Enacting the Common Script: Management Ideas at Finnish Universities of Applied Sciences. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. doi: 10.1177/174114321452301.

  • Wahab, A., & Mahmood, R. (2015). Effect of learning orientation and self-efficacy on performance of university leaders: entrepreneurial leadership as a mediator. Paper Presented at The 18 th Annual Convention of Japanese Association of Administrative Science (JAAS) held atAichi University, Nagoya Campus, Japan, 14-15 November. Available at http://hayalab.com/jaas/

  • Ziderman, A. (1994). Enhancing the financial sustainability of higher education institutions. In J. Salmi & A. M. Verspoor (Eds.,). Revitalizing higher education. (pp. 78- 131). Oxford, New York, Tokyo: IAU Press and Pergamon Press.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics